Skip to main content

Table 3 Gynecological and obstetric background among the studied

From: The role of pelvic floor ultrasound correlated with pelvic organ prolapse quantification in the assessment of anterior and apical compartments of pelvic organ prolapse

Studied variables

Control

Case

P value

N

%

N

%

Menopause

No

30

100

23

43.4

 < 0.001*(1)

Yes

0

0

30

56.6

Mode of delivery

Nullipara

15

50

0

0

 < 0.001*(2)

C/S

10

33.3

0

0

Vaginal

5

16.7

49

92.5

Vaginal + C/S

0

0

4

7.5

Number of delivery

Min.–Max

0–2

1–7

 < 0.001*(1)

Mean ± SD

0.87 ± 0.9

4 ± 1.4

Median (IQR)

0.5(2)

4(2)

No

Yes

Can't remember

P value

N

%

N

%

N

%

Forceps use in vaginal delivery in cases (n = 53)

49

92.5

1

1.9

3

5.7

1.000(1)

Age at first vaginal delivery in cases (n = 53)

Min.–Max

14–32

Mean ± SD

19.5 ± 3.5

Median (IQR)

19(4)

  1. Chi-square test (2) Monte Carlo test
  2. C/S Cesarean Section; IQR Inter-Quartile Range; SD Standard deviation