Table 4 Paired-sample area difference under the ROC curves

Fornix versus R SLF

2.357

.018*

.201

.034

.368

Fornix versus L SLF

2.697

.007*

.230

.063

.397

Fornix versus R SCR

2.506

.012*

.207

.045

.369

Fornix versus R SCP

2.697

.007*

.230

.063

.397

Fornix versus L SCP

2.697

.007*

.230

.063

.397

Fornix versus EC

.947

.344

.068

− .072

.207

Fornix versus PLIC

2.602

.009*

.232

.057

.407

Fornix versus ML

2.972

.003*

.264

.090

.438

L SLF versus R SLF

1.411

.158

.029

− .011

.069

R SLF versus R SCR

.086

.932

.006

− .132

.144

R SLF versus R SCP

1.411

.158

.029

− .011

.069

R SLF versus L SCP

1.411

.158

.029

− .011

.069

R SLF versus EC

− 1.873

.061

− .134

− .273

.006

R SLF versus PLIC

.489

.625

.031

− .093

.155

R SLF versus ML

1.030

.303

.063

− .057

.182

L SLF versus R SCR

− .322

.748

− .023

− .163

.117

L SLF versus R SCP

.000

1.000

.000

L SLF versus L SCP

.000

1.000

.000

L SLF versus EC

− 2.257

.024*

− .163

− .304

− .021

L SLF versus PLIC

.032

.974

.002

− .113

.117

L SLF versus ML

.595

.552

.034

− .077

.144

R SCR versus R SCP

0.321

.748

.023

− .117

.163

R SCR versus L SCP

0.32

.748

.023

− .117

.163

R SCR versus EC

− 2.13

.033*

− .140

− .268

− .011

R SCR versus PLIC

0.297

.767

.025

− .140

.189

R SCR versus ML

0.69

.490

.057

− .104

.217

R SCP versus L SCP

.000

1.000

.000

R SCP versus EC

− 2.257

.024*

− .163

− .304

− .021

R SCP versus PLIC

.032

.974

.002

− .113

.117

R SCP versus ML

.595

.552

.034

− .077

.144

L SCP versus EC

− 2.257

.024*

− .163

− .304

− .021

L SCP versus PLIC

.032

.974

.002

− .113

.117

L SCP versus ML

.595

.552

.034

− .077

.144

EC versus PLIC

2.095

.036*

.165

.011

.318

EC versus ML

2.548

.011

.196

.045

.347

PLIC versus ML

1.492

.136

.032

− .010

.073