Table 7 Comparisons between the diagnostic indices of the three evaluation methods
|  | Sensitivity | Specificity | PPV | NPV | +LR | −LR | Accuracy |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Quantitative Objective Evaluat. | 100% 95% CI 90.9–100 | 66.7% 95% CI 9.43–99.1 | 97.5% 95% CI 88.7–99.4 | 100% | 3.00 95 CI:0.61–14.8 | 0.00 | 97.6% 95% CI 72.5–95.7 |
RECIST 1.1 Evaluation | 87.2% 95% CI 72.5–95.7 | 66.7 % 95% CI 9.4–99.1 | 97.1% 95% CI 87.2–99.4 | 28.6% 95% CI 11.3–55.6 | 2.62 95% CI 0.5–13 | 0.19 95% CI 0.1–0.6 | 85.7% 95% CI 87.4–99.9 |
Combined Response Evaluation | 97.4% 95% CI 86.5–99.9 | 66.7% 95% CI 9.43–99.1 | 97.4% 95% CI 88.4–99.4 | 66.7% 95% CI 19.7–94.2 | 2.92 95% CI 0.59–14.4 | 0.04 95% CI 0.00–0.31 | 95.2% 95% CI 83.8–99.4 |