Skip to main content

Table 7 Comparisons between the diagnostic indices of the three evaluation methods

From: Quantitative mathematical objective evaluation of contrast-enhanced spectral mammogram in the assessment of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy and prediction of residual disease in breast cancer

  Sensitivity Specificity PPV NPV +LR −LR Accuracy
Quantitative Objective Evaluat. 100%
95% CI 90.9–100
66.7%
95% CI 9.43–99.1
97.5%
95% CI 88.7–99.4
100% 3.00
95 CI:0.61–14.8
0.00 97.6%
95% CI 72.5–95.7
RECIST 1.1 Evaluation 87.2%
95% CI 72.5–95.7
66.7 %
95% CI 9.4–99.1
97.1%
95% CI 87.2–99.4
28.6%
95% CI 11.3–55.6
2.62
95% CI 0.5–13
0.19
95% CI 0.1–0.6
85.7%
95% CI 87.4–99.9
Combined Response Evaluation 97.4%
95% CI 86.5–99.9
66.7%
95% CI 9.43–99.1
97.4%
95% CI 88.4–99.4
66.7%
95% CI 19.7–94.2
2.92
95% CI 0.59–14.4
0.04
95% CI 0.00–0.31
95.2%
95% CI 83.8–99.4