Table 3 Results of saturation pulse positioning
| Rate | Conventional MRS | Computer-assisted workflow MRS |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | - | 5 (13.2%) |
| 2 | 17 (94.4%) | 29 (76.3%) |
| 3 | 1 (5.6%) | 4 (10.5%) |
| 4 | - | - |
| 5 | - | - |
| Total | 18 (100%) | 38 (100%) |
| Rate | Conventional MRS | Computer-assisted workflow MRS |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | - | 5 (13.2%) |
| 2 | 17 (94.4%) | 29 (76.3%) |
| 3 | 1 (5.6%) | 4 (10.5%) |
| 4 | - | - |
| 5 | - | - |
| Total | 18 (100%) | 38 (100%) |