Table 4 Results of spectral quality rating
Rate | Conventional MRS | Computer-assisted workflow MRS |
|---|---|---|
1 | 6 (33.3%) | 14 (36.8%) |
2 | 2 (11.1%) | 2 (5.3%) |
3 | 5 (27.8%) | 11 (28.9%) |
4 | 3 (16.7%) | 10 (26.3%) |
5 | 2 (11.1%) | 1 (2.6%) |
Total | 18 (100%) | 38 (100%) |
Rate | Conventional MRS | Computer-assisted workflow MRS |
|---|---|---|
1 | 6 (33.3%) | 14 (36.8%) |
2 | 2 (11.1%) | 2 (5.3%) |
3 | 5 (27.8%) | 11 (28.9%) |
4 | 3 (16.7%) | 10 (26.3%) |
5 | 2 (11.1%) | 1 (2.6%) |
Total | 18 (100%) | 38 (100%) |