Skip to main content

Table 3 Descriptive analysis of the studied cases according to mean objective image quality and subjective image quality

From: Reduced dose iterative reconstruction versus standard dose filtered back projection in detection of bladder tumors

 

Weight ≤ 80 kg (n = 10)

Weight > 80 kg (n = 11)

P value for A1 vs. B1

P value for

A2 vs. B2

Standard dose Protocol A1

80 kVp

Protocol B1

Standard dose Protocol A2

110 kVp Protocol B2

Objective image quality

Mean SNR

Aorta

Min–max.

2.38–7.30

1.45–5.66

1.78–8.71

2.14–9.39

(0.007*)

(0.082)

Mean ± SD

5.10 ± 1.64

3.48 ± 1.56

5.24 ± 2.17

5.14 ± 2.24

Psoas Ms

Min.–max.

2.07–4.56

1.51–3.02

1.21–9.71

1.39–4.08

(0.006*)

(0.82)

Mean ± SD

3.72 ± 0.84

2.23 ± 0.49

3.75 ± 2.32

2.94 ± 0.86

Mean CNR

Aorta

Min.–max.

8.42–22.72

6.64–18.63

5.64–20.29

9.1–29.35

(0.085)

(0.29)

Mean ± SD

13.94 ± 4.55

10.24 ± 3.75

13.39 ± 4.09

15.50 ± 6.9

Psoas Ms

Min.–max.

7.15–17.96

5.47–16.39

4.98–21.63

7.88–23.42

(0.42)

(0.34)

Mean ± SD

12.03 ± 3.55

8.25 ± 2.16

12.02 ± 4.53

13.04 ± 5.07

Subjective image quality

Image noise

3(1–3)

2(1–3)

3(2–3)

3(2–3)

(0.001*)

1

Image quality

3(1–3)

2(1–3)

3(2–3)

3(2–3)

(0.001*)

(0.546)

  1. P values for Wilcoxon signed ranks test for comparing between standard FBP and low dose with IR
  2. *Statistically significant at P ≤ 0.05