Skip to main content

Table 2 Distribution of audio-vestibular dysfunction symptoms in patients with vascular loop/vascular contact MRI

From: Presence of vascular loop in patients with audio-vestibular symptoms: is it a significant finding? Evaluation with 3-tesla MRI 3D constructive interference steady state (CISS) sequence

MR findings

Tinnitus

Sensory hear loss (deafness)

Vertigo

Symptomatic ear (n = 42)

Asymptomatic ear

χ2

p

Symptomatic ear (n = 34)

Asymptomatic ear

χ2

p

With (n = 64)

Without

χ2

p

Patient (n = 154)

Control (n = 120)

Patient (n = 162)

Control (n = 120)

Patients (n = 132)

Control (n = 120)

Vascular loop

 

 Grade I

31 (73.8%)

111 (72.1%)

75 (62.5%)

3.79

0.15

25 (73.5%)

115 (71%)

75 (62.5%)

0.72

0.70

45 (70.3%)

88 (66.7%)

75 (62.5%)

2.22

0.33

 Grade II

7 (16.7%)

39 (25.3%)

37 (30.8%)

8 (23.5%)

39 (24%)

37 (30.8%)

18 (28.1%)

37 (28.0%)

37 (30.8%)

 Grade III

4 (9.5%)

4 (2.6%)

8 (6.7%)

1 (3%)

8 (5%)

8 (6.7%)

1 (1.6%)

7 (5.3%)

8 (6.7%)

Vascular contact

 

 Type I

22 (52.4%)

111 (72.1%)

53 (44.1%)

0.86

0.65

20 (58.8%)

112 (69.1%)

53 (44.2%)

0.03

1.0

42 (65.6%)

100 (75.7%)

53 (44.2%)

0.77

0.68

 Type II

18 (42.8%)

38 (24.7%)

62 (51.7%)

13 (38.3%)

47 (29%)

62 (51.6%)

20 (31.3%)

31 (23.5%)

62 (51.7%)

 Type III

2 (4.8%)

5 (3.2%)

5 (4.2%)

1 (2.9%)

3 (1.9%)

5 (4.2%)

2 (3.1%)

1 (0.8%)

5 (4.2%)

  1. χ2 Chi square test
  2. Grade I in CPA, Grade II in IAC < 50%, Grade III in IAC > 50%
  3. Type I no contact, Type II contact without nerve angulation, Type III contact with nerve angulation
  4. p p value for comparing between the different groups