Assessment of segmental agreement of T2 mapping versus triple inversion recovery in detection of acute myocardial edema

Egyptian Journal of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine

Table 1 Total myocardial edema mass

BSA	Diagnosis	LV mass (g)	Total TIRM (g)	Total TIRM (%)	Total T2 mapping (g)	Total T2 mapping (%)	LVEF%	RVEF%
2.2	LAD MI	153	55	35	48	31	56	46
1.7	LAD MI	143	32	22	32	22	42	74
2	LAD MI	94	29	16	15	16	51	64
1.6	LAD MI	87	51	59	38	44	41	62
1.7	LCx MI	113	5	4	5	4	59	74
1.7	LAD MI	149	13	8	15	10	32	63
2.3	LAD MI	116	21	18	17	15	62	61
1.7	LCx MI	82	4	5	7	8.5	42	53
1.7	LAD MI	100	49	49	36	36	58	58
1.8	LAD+RCA	120	16	13	8	6	38	66
2.1	LAD MI	97	28	29	37	32	33	42
1.9	LAD+LCx	120	16	13	13	10	51	53
2.1	RCA MI	129	6	5	6	5	36	42
2.1	RCA MI	106	2	18	17	16	50	63
1.9	LAD MI	196	23	12	16	4	37	47
1.6	LCx MI	102	5	5	3	3	47	60
1.9	LAD MI	188	29	15	14	7	38	57
1.8	LAD MI	119	51	42	52	43	31	49
1.6	LAD MI	56	13	23	21	37	48	72
1.7	LAD MI	118	37	4	48	6	33	49
1.4	RCA MI	111	8	7	8	7	46	31
1.9	LAD MI	129	36	27	28	22	46	51
1.5	LAD MI	166	48	29	53	31	32	45
1.6	LAD MI	126	41	33	39	31	43	46
	Average	123.0	23.5	21.2	22.4	18.4	42	55
	SD	33.8	17.2	15.7	15.7	14.1	9.4	9.9

MI myocardial infarction, SD standard deviation, LCx left circumflex artery, LAD left anterior descending artery, RCA right coronary artery, BSA body surface area, LV left ventricle, TIRM turbo inversion recovery magnitude