Skip to main content

Table 3 Perception on quality of radiographers that will be produced by the program

From: Perception of radiography lecturers towards the proposed doctor of radiography program

Items on quality

SA

A

D

SD

U

Mean

S. D.

Decision

Competence in three imaging modalities.

27 (43.5)

26 (41.9)

3 (4.8)

0 (0.0)

6 (9.7)

3.10

1.169

A

Ability to rise to the highest level in public service.

35 (56.5)

23 (37.1)

1 (1.6)

2 (3.2)

1 (1.6)

3.44

0.822

A

The radiographers can contribute to policy formulation.

28 (45.2)

29 (46.8)

4 (6.5)

1 (1.6)

4 (6.5)

3.26

0.957

A

The radiographers can enhance policy implementation.

27 (43.5)

26 (41.9)

4 (6.5)

1 (1.6)

4 (6.5)

3.15

1.069

A

Ability to command respect like their medical counterparts

23 (37.1)

29 (46.8)

3 (4.8)

1 (1.6)

6 (9.7)

3.00

1.173

A

Ability to perform effectively in hospital diagnostic services

32 (51.6)

28 (45.2)

1 (1.6)

1 (1.6)

0 (0.0)

3.47

0.620

A

Ability to perform effectively in public health services

26 (41.9)

31 (50.0)

1 (1.6)

1 (1.6)

3 (4.8)

3.23

0.948

A

The radiographers can function independently in the discharge of duties

24 (38.7)

30 (48.4)

2 (3.2)

1 (1.6)

5 (8.1)

3.08

1.106

A

Collaboration with other members of the health team

33 (53.2)

27 (43.5)

1 (1.6)

1 (1.6)

0 (0.0)

3.48

0.620

A

Grand mean

     

3.25

0.18

A

  1. A agree/accepted, D disagree/not accepted