Table 5 Gender, age group, location, size, and effect on biliary tree in comparison to MDCT resectability criteria
From: Role of multidetector computed tomography in evaluation of resectability of pancreatic cancer
NCCN | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Resectable | Borderline resectable | Locally advanced | Metastatic | P value | |||||
Count | % | Count | % | Count | % | Count | % | ||
Gender | 0.502 | ||||||||
Male | 7 | 29% | 2 | 8% | 5 | 21% | 10 | 42% | |
Female | 6 | 33% | 3 | 17% | 1 | 6% | 8 | 44% | |
Age group | 0.220 | ||||||||
30–39 | 1 | 50% | 0 | 0% | 1 | 50% | 0 | 0% | |
40–49 | 2 | 40% | 1 | 20% | 2 | 40% | 0 | 0% | |
50–59 | 5 | 31% | 1 | 6% | 2 | 13% | 8 | 50% | |
60–69 | 4 | 29% | 2 | 14% | 1 | 7% | 7 | 50% | |
70–79 | 1 | 25% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% | 3 | 75% | |
80–89 | 0 | 0% | 1 | 100% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% | |
Location | 0.127 | ||||||||
Head/neck | 13 | 36% | 5 | 14% | 4 | 11% | 14 | 39% | |
Body/tail | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% | 2 | 33% | 4 | 67% | |
Size | 0.352 | ||||||||
<2 cm | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% | |
2–4 cm | 9 | 43% | 3 | 14% | 3 | 14% | 6 | 29% | |
4–6 cm | 3 | 27% | 0 | 0% | 2 | 18% | 6 | 55% | |
>6 cm | 1 | 10% | 2 | 20% | 1 | 10% | 6 | 60% | |
Biliary tree | 0.386 | ||||||||
Not dilated | 2 | 18% | 1 | 9% | 0 | 0% | 8 | 73% | |
Dilated | 7 | 33% | 3 | 15% | 4 | 19% | 7 | 33% | |
Stent | 4 | 40% | 1 | 10% | 2 | 20% | 3 | 30% | |