Skip to main content

Table 5 Descriptive analysis of the studied cases according to different parameters in DCM diagnosis (n =50)

From: Could native T1 mapping replace late gadolinium enhancement in the assessment of myocardial fibrosis in patients with cardiomyopathy?

  Min. Max. Mean ± SD Median
RV EF 19.0 76.0 52.34 13.07 56.0
RV EDV 59.0 356.0 173.0 59.70 154.0
RV ESV 22.0 219.0 87.97 47.34 70.0
RV SV 23.0 137.0 86.66 24.85 87.0
RV EDVI 37.0 187.0 90.20 33.50 80.0
RV ESVI 14.0 115.0 46.54 26.34 34.0
RV SVI 12.0 72.0 45.31 12.93 46.0
LV EF 11.0 74.0 42.63 14.68 45.0
LV EDV 71.0 848.0 239.6 140.8 200.0
LV ESV 32.0 348.0 141.0 80.13 124.0
LV SV 30.0 118.0 86.94 22.86 87.0
LV EDVI 44.0 265.0 115.2 49.91 102.0
LV ESVI 20.0 228.0 71.83 48.48 60.0
LV SVI 16.0 64.0 46.31 10.55 47.0
  1. EDV(I) end-diastolic volume (indexed), EF ejection fraction, ESV(I) end-systolic volume (indexed), LV left ventricle, RV right ventricle, SV(I) stroke volume (indexed)