Skip to main content

Table 5 Descriptive analysis of the studied cases according to different parameters in DCM diagnosis (n =50)

From: Could native T1 mapping replace late gadolinium enhancement in the assessment of myocardial fibrosis in patients with cardiomyopathy?

 

Min.

Max.

Mean

± SD

Median

RV EF

19.0

76.0

52.34

13.07

56.0

RV EDV

59.0

356.0

173.0

59.70

154.0

RV ESV

22.0

219.0

87.97

47.34

70.0

RV SV

23.0

137.0

86.66

24.85

87.0

RV EDVI

37.0

187.0

90.20

33.50

80.0

RV ESVI

14.0

115.0

46.54

26.34

34.0

RV SVI

12.0

72.0

45.31

12.93

46.0

LV EF

11.0

74.0

42.63

14.68

45.0

LV EDV

71.0

848.0

239.6

140.8

200.0

LV ESV

32.0

348.0

141.0

80.13

124.0

LV SV

30.0

118.0

86.94

22.86

87.0

LV EDVI

44.0

265.0

115.2

49.91

102.0

LV ESVI

20.0

228.0

71.83

48.48

60.0

LV SVI

16.0

64.0

46.31

10.55

47.0

  1. EDV(I) end-diastolic volume (indexed), EF ejection fraction, ESV(I) end-systolic volume (indexed), LV left ventricle, RV right ventricle, SV(I) stroke volume (indexed)