Skip to main content

Table 3 Correlations between metabolic parameters of FDG-PET/CT and patient/tumor characteristics

From: FDG-PET/CT in predicting aggressiveness of rectal cancer

Variables

N

SUVmax*

p

SUV mean*

p

MTV*

P

TLG*

p

Size

33

 

0.85

 

0.25

 

0.003

 

0.003

Location

  

0.33

 

0.37

 

0.89

 

0.59

Lower*

19

12.96 [6.6–22.3]

 

7.4 [3.88–13.88]

 

21.5 [10.94–25.4]

 

188.11[57.2–42.05]

 

Middle, lower*

3

15.4 [7.36–17.8]

 

9.18 [4.3–10.62]

 

22.18 [16.02–40.72]

 

168.99 [84.1–421.2]

 

middle*

7

20.6 [14.9–0]

 

12.9 [9.4–0]

 

18.56 [4.86–0]

 

173.53 [62.69–0]

 

Upper*

4

20.99 [12.41–29.43]

 

10.78 [7.7–16.6]

 

23.87 [15.2–37.8]

 

322.4 [122.7–472.9]

 

Clinical stage

  

0.89

 

0.9

 

0.13

 

0.34

II*

10

19.445 [10.92–35.8]

 

11.68 [6.1675–21.4]

 

18.785 [10.27–28.225]

 

229.58 [53.5–467.2]

 

IIIA*

6

16.98 [9.32–25.45

 

10.4 [5.7325–15.315]

 

18.4 [11.97–25.09]

 

114.74 [71.42–387.3]

 

IV*

17

17.5 [13.93–27.1]

 

9.97 [8.17–14.875]

 

25.42 [19.07–46.435]

 

315.58[150.7–507.8]

 

Metastasis load

  

0.78

 

0.9

 

0.104

 

0.18

Negative*

16

19.25 [11.07–28.525]

 

11.68 [6.66–17.507]

 

18.4 [11.24–24.88]

 

170.45 [61.44–410.97]

 

Oligo–metastasis*

6

17.87 [11.1–21.7]

 

10.61 [6.4–13.4]

 

23.33 [15.7–39.9]

 

208.48 [109.1–298.04]

 

multiple*

11

17.3 [14.9–29.4]

 

9.8 [8.9–15.2]

 

33.34 [18.56–55.23]

 

362.8[173.5–550.6]

 
  1. *Median, range