Skip to main content

Table 6 Characterizations of the lesions (ABUS)

From: Do automated breast ultrasound and tomosynthesis have an effective role in dense breast evaluation?

  

Count

%

Breast composition (automated)

Homogenous fat

0

0.0

Homogenous fibroglandular

28

75.7

Heterogenous

9

24.3

Shape (automated)

Oval

13

34.2

Round

3

7.9

Irregular

22

57.9

Margin (automated)

Circumscribed

14

36.8

Indistinct

3

7.9

Angular

2

5.3

Microlobulated

0

0.0

Speculated

19

50.0

Orientation (automated)

Parallel

15

40.5

Not parallel

22

59.5

Echo pattern (automated)

Anechoic

1

2.7

Hyper-echoic

0

0.0

Complex solid and cystic

1

2.7

Hypoechoic

29

78.4

Isoechoic

3

8.1

Heterogenous

3

8.1

Posterior feature (automated)

No features

23

62.2

Enhancement

6

16.2

Shadowing

7

18.9

Combined pattern

1

2.7

Calcification (automated)

No calcification

37

97.4

In mass

1

2.6

Outside mass

0

0.0

Intra-ductal

0

0.0

Mass N (automated)

Single

17

44.7

Multiple

18

47.4

No

3

7.9

Location (automated)

UOQ

18

47.4

UIQ

2

5.3

LOQ

2

5.3

LIQ

1

2.6

Retroareolar

7

18.4

Scattered

7

18.4

Axilla

1

2.6

Nipple retraction (automated)

Yes

8

21.6

No

29

78.4

Skin thickening and retraction (automated)

Yes

11

28.9

No

27

71.1

Axillary lymphadenopathy (automated)

Yes

8

21.1

No

30

78.9

Laterality (automated)

Unilateral

22

57.9

Bilateral

16

42.1

AUTO character (automated)

Solid

17

45.9

Cystic

9

24.3

Solid with cystic component

11

29.7

Coronal view (automated)

Retraction phenomena

5

13.2

Complete hyperechoic rim

15

39.5

Incomplete hyperechoic rim

18

47.4

Extension (automated)

Yes

9

23.7

No

29

76.3

BIRADS (automated)

BIRADS I

1

2.7

BIRADS II

3

8.1

BIRADS III

10

27.0

BIRADS IV

8

21.6

BIRADS V

13

35.1

BIRADS VI

2

5.4