Skip to main content

Table 1 Relation between meningioma operative consistency and different MRI parameters

From: Can magnetic resonance imaging predict preoperative consistency and vascularity of intracranial meningioma?

MRI parameters

Meningioma operative consistency

p

Soft

(n = 19)

Intermediate

(n = 14)

Firm

(n = 7)

No

%

No

%

No

%

T2 signal

       

 Hyperintense

14

73.7

5

35.7

0

0.0

p = 0.001*

 Isointense

5

26.3

8

57.1

5

71.4

 Hypointense

0

0.0

1

7.1

2

28.6

Significance between groups

p1 = 0.047*, p2 = 0.001*, p3 = 0.117

 

Diffusion

       

 Free diffusion

2

10.5

0

0.0

3

42.9

p < 0.001*

 Iso diffusion

2

10.5

4

28.6

4

57.1

 Restricted

15

78.9

10

71.4

0

0.0

Significance between groups

p1 = 0.322, p2 = 0.001*, p3 = 0.001*

 

ADC

× 10−5 cm2/s

× 10−5 cm2/s

× 10−5 cm2/s

 

 Min.–Max

0.60–1.30

0.70–1.20

0.90–1.40

p = 0.024*

 Mean ± SD

0.89 ± 0.19

0.88 ± 0.22

1.13 ± 0.21

 Median

0.85

0.80

1.10

Significance between groups

p1 = 0.987, p2 = 0.031*, p3 = 0.031*

 

TCTI ratio

    

 Min.–Max

1.75–2.87

1.31–1.60

0.90–1.20

p < 0.001*

 Mean ± SD

1.99 ± 0.29

1.50 ± 0.10

1.09 ± 0.11

 Median

1.90

1.53

1.10

Significance between groups

p1 < 0.001*, p2 < 0.001*, p3 = 0.001*

 
  1. ADC, apparent diffusion coefficient; p, p value for association between different categories; n, number of patients; p1, p value for association between soft and intermediate; p2, p value for association between soft and firm; p3, p value for association between intermediate and firm; SD, standard deviation; TCTI, Tumor/cerebellar peduncle T2-weighted imaging intensity
  2. *Statistically significant at p ≤ 0.05