Skip to main content

Table 4 Comparison between EmboGuide with observer A and observer B (n = 57)

From: The efficacy of TACE; how can automated feeder software help?

 

Number of arterial feeders detected

Observer A

Observer B

EmboGuide

1

15 (26.3%)

16 (28.1%)

12 (21.1%)

2

23 (40.4%)

24 (42.1%)

17 (29.8%)

3

16 (28.1%)

11 (19.3%)

17 (29.8%)

4

3 (5.3%)

6 (10.5%)

11 (19.3%)

p

0.001*

0.001*

 
  1. p2: p value for marginal homogeneity test for comparison between EmboGuide with observer A and observer B
  2. *: Statistically significant at p ≤ 0.05