Skip to main content

Table 4 Comparison between EmboGuide with observer A and observer B (n = 57)

From: The efficacy of TACE; how can automated feeder software help?

  Number of arterial feeders detected
Observer A Observer B EmboGuide
1 15 (26.3%) 16 (28.1%) 12 (21.1%)
2 23 (40.4%) 24 (42.1%) 17 (29.8%)
3 16 (28.1%) 11 (19.3%) 17 (29.8%)
4 3 (5.3%) 6 (10.5%) 11 (19.3%)
p 0.001* 0.001*  
  1. p2: p value for marginal homogeneity test for comparison between EmboGuide with observer A and observer B
  2. *: Statistically significant at p ≤ 0.05