Table 3 Association between each type of ARM and spinal dysraphism and its significance
From: Role of ultrasonography in screening of spinal dysraphism in infants at risk
ARM | No spinal dysraphism | Spinal dysraphism | Test value | P value | Sig. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
No. = 13 | No. = 20 | ||||
Rectourethral fistula | |||||
No | 13 (100.0%) | 16 (80.0%) | 2.959* | 0.085 | NS |
Yes | 0 (0.0%) | 4 (20.0%) | |||
Rectal atresia | |||||
No | 10 (76.9%) | 19 (95.0%) | 2.417* | 0.120 | NS |
Yes | 3 (23.1%) | 1 (5.0%) | |||
Cloacal malformation | |||||
No | 11 (84.6%) | 17 (85.0%) | 0.001* | 0.976 | NS |
Yes | 2 (15.4%) | 3 (15.0%) | |||
Vestibular fistula | |||||
No | 12 (92.3%) | 18 (90.0%) | 0.051* | 0.822 | NS |
Yes | 1 (7.7%) | 2 (10.0%) | |||
Perineal fistula | |||||
No | 11 (84.6%) | 20 (100.0%) | 3.275* | 0.070 | NS |
Yes | 2 (15.4%) | 0 (0.0%) | |||
Rectovaginal fistula | |||||
No | 13 (100.0%) | 19 (95.0%) | 0.670* | 0.413 | NS |
Yes | 0 (0.0%) | 1 (5.0%) | |||