Skip to main content

Table 3 The estimated sensitivity and specificity in the included studies in the current meta-analysis

From: Assessment of intravoxel incoherent motion MR imaging for differential diagnosis of breast lesions and evaluation of response: a systematic review

  Author Year Threshold AUC Sensitivity Specificity TP FP FN TN
ADC He et al. [40] 2021  < 0.983 0.915 91.45% 82.54% NA NA NA NA
Zhao et al. [43] 2018 1.15 0.9 0.857 0.893 63 2 17 20
Lin et al. [45] 2017 1.203 0.931 0.894 0.843 46 5 7 40
Cho et al. [47] 2015 NA 0.69 0.58 0.833 29 2 21 10
Wang et al. [48] 2016 NA NA 0.808 0.677 46 14 11 30
Bokacheva et al. [50] 2014 1.54 0.72 0.65 0.71 17 4 9 10
D Muzhen He et al. [40] 2021  < 0.952 0.909 90.13% 80.95% NA NA NA NA
Meng et al. [41] 2020 1.01 0.809 0.7385 0.9138 48 5 17 53
Zhao et al. [43] 2018 1.09 0.92 0.929 0.88 11 3 8 19
Xijin Mao et al. [44] 2018 1.21 0.883 83.0 57.4 NA NA NA NA
Lin et al. [45] 2017 1.096 0.945 0.872 0.843 44 7 7 40
Cho et al. [47] 2015 NA 0.77 0.66 0.917 33 1 17 11
Wang et al. [48] 2016 NA NA 0.937 0.874 53 6 4 38
Liu et al. [49] 2016 1.02 0.917 0.89 0.83 32 4 4 19
Bokacheva et al. [50] 2014 1.52 0.75 0.85 0.64 22 5 4 9
D* He [40] 2021  > 0.873 0.574 42.76% 77.78% NA NA NA NA
Meng et al. [41] 2020 26.58 0.67 0.7385 0.547 85 10 34 12
Zhao et al. [43] 2018 43.18 0.674 0.714 0.86 19 2 7 12
Lin et al. [45] 2017 99.056 0.682 0.702 0.588 36 19 15 28
Cho et al. [47] 2015 NA 0.5 1 0.25 50 9 0 3
Liu et al. [49] 2016 140.88 NA 0.86 0.74 31 6 5 17
Bokacheva et al. [50] 2014 0.58 0.84 0.85 0.86 22 2 4 12
F Meng et al. [40] 2020 4.99 0.766 0.7385 0.7586 48 14 17 44
Zhao et al. [43] 2018 20.3 0.885 0.857 0.893 50 2 17 20
Xijin Mao [44] 2018 7.86 0.601 64.9 57.4 NA NA NA NA
Lin et al. [45] 2017 7.87 0.802 0.863 0.66 44 16 7 31
Cho et al. [47] 2015 NA 0.72 0.833 0.726 42 3 8 9
Liu et al. [49] 2016 7.2 NA 0.86 0.74 31 6 5 17
Bokacheva et al. [50] 2014 4.9 0.79 0.73 0.86 19 2 7 12