Assessment of intravoxel incoherent motion MR imaging for differential diagnosis of breast lesions and evaluation of response: a systematic review

Egyptian Journal of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine

Table 3 The estimated sensitivity and specificity in the included studies in the current meta-analysis

	Author	Year	Threshold	AUC	Sensitivity	Specificity	TP	FP	FN	TN
ADC	He et al. [40]	2021	< 0.983	0.915	91.45%	82.54%	NA	NA	NA	NA
	Zhao et al. [43]	2018	1.15	0.9	0.857	0.893	63	2	17	20
	Lin et al. [45]	2017	1.203	0.931	0.894	0.843	46	5	7	40
	Cho et al. [47]	2015	NA	0.69	0.58	0.833	29	2	21	10
	Wang et al. [48]	2016	NA	NA	0.808	0.677	46	14	11	30
	Bokacheva et al. [50]	2014	1.54	0.72	0.65	0.71	17	4	9	10
D	Muzhen He et al. [40]	2021	< 0.952	0.909	90.13%	80.95%	NA	NA	NA	NA
	Meng et al. [41]	2020	1.01	0.809	0.7385	0.9138	48	5	17	53
	Zhao et al. [43]	2018	1.09	0.92	0.929	0.88	11	3	8	19
	Xijin Mao et al. [44]	2018	1.21	0.883	83.0	57.4	NA	NA	NA	NA
	Lin et al. [45]	2017	1.096	0.945	0.872	0.843	44	7	7	40
	Cho et al. [47]	2015	NA	0.77	0.66	0.917	33	1	17	11
	Wang et al. [48]	2016	NA	NA	0.937	0.874	53	6	4	38
	Liu et al. [49]	2016	1.02	0.917	0.89	0.83	32	4	4	19
	Bokacheva et al. [50]	2014	1.52	0.75	0.85	0.64	22	5	4	9
D*	He [40]	2021	> 0.873	0.574	42.76%	77.78%	NA	NA	NA	NA
	Meng et al. [41]	2020	26.58	0.67	0.7385	0.547	85	10	34	12
	Zhao et al. [43]	2018	43.18	0.674	0.714	0.86	19	2	7	12
	Lin et al. [45]	2017	99.056	0.682	0.702	0.588	36	19	15	28
	Cho et al. [47]	2015	NA	0.5	1	0.25	50	9	0	3
	Liu et al. [49]	2016	140.88	NA	0.86	0.74	31	6	5	17
	Bokacheva et al. [50]	2014	0.58	0.84	0.85	0.86	22	2	4	12
F	Meng et al. [40]	2020	4.99	0.766	0.7385	0.7586	48	14	17	44
	Zhao et al. [43]	2018	20.3	0.885	0.857	0.893	50	2	17	20
	Xijin Mao [44]	2018	7.86	0.601	64.9	57.4	NA	NA	NA	NA
	Lin et al. [45]	2017	7.87	0.802	0.863	0.66	44	16	7	31
	Cho et al. [47]	2015	NA	0.72	0.833	0.726	42	3	8	9
	Liu et al. [49]	2016	7.2	NA	0.86	0.74	31	6	5	17
	Bokacheva et al. [50]	2014	4.9	0.79	0.73	0.86	19	2	7	12