Skip to main content

Table 8 Comparison between the two studied groups (56 rTOF patients and 56 healthy volunteers) regarding different CMR LV volumetric and function indices

From: CMR parameters and CMR-FT in repaired tetralogy of Fallot

 

rTOF patients

(n = 56)

Healthy

(n = 56)

Test of sig

p

LVEF (%)

 Min.–Max

36.0–72.0

54.0–77.0

t = 5.342*

 < 0.001*

 Mean ± SD

57.0 ± 7.56

63.63 ± 5.38

LVEDV (ml)

 Min.–Max

29.0–307.0

91.0–189.0

t = 0.248

0.805

 Mean ± SD

135.3 ± 58.79

133.20 ± 22.46

LVESV (ml)

 Min.–Max

11.0–178.0

29.0–73.0

U = 1322.500

0.153

 Mean ± SD

60.62 ± 34.12

48.66 ± 11.82

LVSV (ml)

 Min.–Max

18.0–155.0

56.0–121.0

t = 2.463*

0.016*

 Mean ± SD

74.71 ± 28.80

85.36 ± 14.70

LVEDVI (ml/m2)

 Min.–Max

38.0–166.0

25.0–155.0

t = 4.006*

 < 0.001*

 Mean ± SD

89.29 ± 24.59

73.43 ± 16.51

LVESVI (ml/m2)

 Min.–Max

16.0–87.0

17.0–80.0

t = 4.354*

 < 0.001*

 Mean ± SD

39.13 ± 15.05

28.63 ± 9.97

LVSVI (ml/m2)

 Min.–Max

20.0–101.0

19.0–62.0

t = 1.730

0.087

 Mean ± SD

49.79 ± 13.26

46.23 ± 7.79

  1. SD standard deviation, t student t test, U Mann–Whitney test
  2. p: p value for comparing between the studied groups
  3. *Statistically significant at p ≤ 0.05