Table 4 Diverticulum and appendage location, diameters, sex–age distribution coexistence of different studies
From: Cardiac CT evaluation of left atrial diverticulum and accessory appendage
M n, (%) | F n, (%) | Age | D Type: n, (%) | VDD (mm) (min–max) | TDD (mm) (min–max) | A Type (n, %) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Abbara et al. [6] | 82 (81) | 19 (19) | 58 ± 13 | AS: 99, (88) | 6.4 ± 2.5 (3–14) | 6.2 ± 3.9 (2–13) | RLPI: 15, (34) |
Genç et al. [5] | 505 (71.3) | 203 (28.7) | – | RAS: 328, (46) | 5.5 ± 3.3 (1–20) | 5.9 ± 2.9 (1–18) | SL: 23, (32) |
Holda et al. [7] | 35 (61.4) | 22 (38.6) | 68.5 ± 14.6 | AS: 31, (66) | 5.9 ± 2.8 (1.7–16.7) | 6.4 ± 3.2 (1.9–15.4) | Ant: 8, (66) |
Wan et al. [1] | 9 (45) | 11 (55) | 58.1 ± 12.9 | RA: 18, (66.7) | 5.4 ± 2 (1.8–9,4) | 4.9 ± 3.2 (1.3–14.2) | – |
Incedayı et al. [8] | 140 (75) | 46 (25) | – | RAS: 166, (36.6) | 5.2 (2–16) | 3.8 ± 1.5 (1–10) | IL:6, (42.8) |
Lazoura et al. [9] | 135 (67.5) | 65 (32.5) | 55 | RAS: 36, (45) | 7.8 (3–16) | 7.2 (2.2–20.3) | RAS: 7, (54.8) |