Skip to main content

Table 5 Comparison of two CTA protocols (significant p value less than 0.05)

From: Comparison of Turbo Flash and dual-energy modes of third-generation dual-source CT in pre-transplant renal angiography: a prospective observational study

Groups

N

Mean

SD

t value

p value

Contrast volume

Group A

30

60.0

0.0

18.310

0.0005

Group B

30

31.5

7.0

Aorta HU

Group A

30

386.4

64.8

4.005

0.0005

Group B

30

313.2

49.9

RR mean

Group A

30

315.9

43.3

2.051

0.047

Group B

30

287.1

45.4

LR mean

Group A

30

320.9

49.2

2.413

0.021

Group B

30

284.4

46.5

Psoas mean

Group A

30

53.4

3.5

0.528

0.600

Group B

30

54.4

7.2

SD mean

Group A

30

8.0

2.0

3.819

0.0005

Group B

30

13.6

6.3

CTDIvol

Group A

30

8.3

0.8

5.155

0.0005

Group B

30

6.0

1.8

DLP

Group A

30

266.4

25.9

5.155

0.0005

Group B

30

192.5

58.7

ERD

Group A

30

4.0

0.4

5.155

0.0005

Group B

30

2.9

0.9

RR + LR mean

Group A

30

318.4

45.0

2.281

0.028

Group B

30

285.7

45.5

SNR

Group A

30

42.8

13.7

4.456

0.0005

Group B

30

25.1

11.3

CNR

Group A

30

35.6

12.0

4.531

0.0005

Group B

30

20.2

9.3