Skip to main content

Table 4 Comparison between positive and negative hepatic steatosis patients according to the presence of LI-RADS major and ancillary features

From: Effect of hepatic fat fraction on major hepatocellular carcinoma features at magnetic resonance imaging

Characteristics

 

Total

Hepatic steatosis

p value

  

Positive

Negative

Major HCC features

Non-rim APHE

Early

48 (52.2%)

14 (31.1%)

34 (72.3%)

0.000

 

Late

44 (47.8%)

31 (68.9%)

13 (27.7%)

 

Non-peripheral “washout”

No

5 (5.4%)

4 (8.9%)

1 (2.1%)

0.175

 

Portal

42 (45.7%)

17 (37.8%)

25 (53.2%)

 
 

Delayed

45 (48.9%)

24 (53.3%)

21 (44.7%)

 

Enhancing capsule

51 (55.4%)

17 (37.8%)

34 (72.3%)

0.001

 

Size (mm)

< 50

62 (67.4%)

37 (82.2%)

25 (53.2%)

0.003

 

50 or more

30 (32.6%)

8 (17.8%)

22 (46.8%)

 

Threshold growth

17 (18.5%)

11 (24.4%)

6 (12.8%)

0.149

 

Ancillary features favoring malignancy

Corona enhancement

 

8 (8.7%)

3 (6.7%)

5 (10.6%)

0.714

Threshold growth

 

14 (15.2%)

10 (22.2%)

4 (8.5%)

0.067

Mild–moderate T2 hyperintensity

 

74 (80.4%)

32 (71.1%)

42 (89.4%)

0.027

Restricted diffusion

 

70 (76.1%)

34 (75.6%)

36 (76.6%)

0.907

Fat sparing in solid mass

 

5 (5.4%)

5 (11.1%)

0 (0%)

0.025

Ancillary features favoring HCC

Non-enhancing “capsule”

 

7 (7.6%)

7 (15.6%)

0 (0%)

0.005

Nodule-in-nodule architecture

 

6 (6.5%)

2 (4.4%)

4 (8.5%)

0.677

Mosaic architecture

 

9 (9.8%)

3 (6.7%)

6 (12.8%)

0.486

Fat in mass, more than adjacent liver

 

31 (33.7%)

7 (15.6%)

24 (51.1%)

0.000

Blood products in mass

 

6 (6.5%)

1 (2.2%)

5 (10.6%)

0.204