Skip to main content

Table 5 Correlation of steatosis degree with LI-RADS major and ancillary HCC features

From: Effect of hepatic fat fraction on major hepatocellular carcinoma features at magnetic resonance imaging

 

Steatosis grade

Hepatic fat fraction %

 

r

P*

r

P*

Major HCC features

Non-peripheral “washout”

− 0.169

0.268

− 0.186

0.220

Enhancing “capsule”

− 0.441

0.002

− 0.219

0.149

Size (mm)

− 0.331

0.026

− 0.264

0.080

Threshold growth

− 0.093

0.543

0.072

0.640

Ancillary features favoring malignancy

Corona enhancement

− 0.151

0.322

− 0.206

0.175

Subthreshold growth

0.052

0.733

− 0.012

0.936

Mild–moderate T2 hyperintensity

− 0.454

0.002

− 0.370

0.012

Restricted diffusion

− 0.308

0.039

− 0.327

0.029

Fat sparing in solid mass

0.153

0.317

0.060

0.696

Ancillary features favoring HCC

Non-enhancing “capsule”

0.164

0.282

0.038

0.805

Nodule-in-nodule architecture

− 0.122

0.425

− 0.008

0.957

Mosaic architecture

− 0.151

0.322

0.021

0.893

Fat in mass, more than adjacent liver

− 0.107

0.483

− 0.033

0.829

Blood products in mass

− 0.085

0.578

0.093

0.544

  1. r Spearman correlation coefficient
  2. *Spearman correlation test