Skip to main content

Table 4 Comparison between nodules type and size as described by final CAD system and the reference radiologist (N = 79)

From: Assessment of artificial intelligence-aided computed tomography in lung cancer screening

Variables

Final CAD system

Reference radiologist

p value

No. of total nodules

   

Median (range)

1 (0–100)

1 (0–15)

0.852a

Total nodules

   

Absent

22 (27.8%)

22 (27.8%)

1.00b

Present

57 (72.2%)

57 (72.2%)

 

Size of total nodules

   

≤ 6 mm

30 (37.9%)

29 (36.7%)

 

> 6 mm

28 (35.5%)

28 (35.5%)

0.954b

No. of solid nodules

   

Median (range)

1 (0–91)

1 (0–13)

0.773a

Solid nodules

   

Absent

32 (40.5%)

42 (53.1%)

0.782b

Present

47 (59.5%)

37 (46.9%)

 

Size of solid nodules

   

≤ 6 mm

23 (30.4%)

19 (24.1%)

0.817a

> 6 mm

24 (29.1%)

18 (22.8%)

 

No. of subsolid nodules

   

Median (range)

0 (0–9)

1 (0–2)

0.978a

Subsolid nodules (n, %)

   

Absent

54 (68.4%)

54 (68.4%)

1.00b

Present

25 (31.6%)

25 (31.6%)

 

Size of subsolid nodules

   

 ≤ 6 mm

14 (17.7%)

14 (17.7%)

1.00b

 > 6 mm

11 (13.9%)

11 (13.9%)

 

No. of calcified nodules

   

Median (range)

0 (0–1)

1 (0–1)

0.993a

Calcified nodules (n, %)

   

Absent

78 (98.7%)

78 (98.7%)

1.00c

Present

1 (1.3%)

1 (1.3%)

 

Size of calcified nodules

   

≤ 6 mm

1 (1.3%)

1 (1.3%)

1.00c

> 6 mm

0 (0%)

0 (0%)

 
  1. aMann–Whitney test
  2. bChi–square test
  3. cFisher exact test