Skip to main content

Table 2 Imaging findings in the studied cases using MRE versus MRE with Dixon

From: MR enterography in small bowel diseases, adding multipoint Dixon sequence, is it worth?

Imaging findings

MRE

N (%)

MRE + Dixon

N (%)

Mural thickening

Submucosal fat deposition

25 (36.23)

27 (39.13)

Submucosal edema

27 (39.13)

30 (43.48)

Multiple polyps/polypoid mucosal thickening

2 (2.9)

3 (4.35)

Segmental small bowel dilatation

34 (49.28)

34 (49.28)

Lost jejunal folds

2 (2.9)

2 (2.9)

Sinus / fistulous tracts

2 (2.9)

5 (7.25)

Ulcers

7 (10.14)

9 (13.04)

Fibrofatty proliferation

12 (17.39)

15 (21.74)

Perienteric edema

13 (18.84)

14 (20.29)

lymphadenopathy

16 (23.19)

16 (23.19)

Vascular engorgement

8 (11.59)

8 (11.59)

Fat necrosis

2 (2.9)

3 (4.35)

Neoplastic lesions

3 (4.35)

4 (5.8)

Normal study

19 (27.54)

17 (24.64)

  1. MRE: magnetic resonance enteorography, N = number, % = percentage, SD = standard deviation