Skip to main content

The reversed halo sign with a reticulonodular pattern as unusual findings of pulmonary infarct in acute pulmonary embolism: case report and literature review

Abstract

Background

The reversed halo, also known as the atoll sign, is a distinct sign with ring-shaped consolidation and central lucency. The reversed halo sign, initially emerging in cryptogenic organizing pneumonia, has been observed in various pulmonary diseases, including pulmonary embolism. The presence of this sign in the subpleural, posterior basal parts of the lower lobes, predominantly when solitary, should raise the possibility of other causes, such as pulmonary infarction.

Case presentation

We present a case of acute pulmonary embolism with pulmonary infarction discovered on a CT pulmonary angiogram in our emergency department, where the pulmonary infarction appears as a reverse halo sign with a reticulonodular pattern. The reticular nodular pattern in the halo sign is not typical of a pulmonary infarct presenting with a reverse halo sign.

Conclusions

To our knowledge, this is the first case of pulmonary infarction in acute pulmonary embolism with the appearance of a reverse halo sign with a reticulonodular pattern.

Background

One frequent and potentially fatal side effect of venous thromboembolic illness (VTE) is acute pulmonary embolism (PE) [1].

Computed tomography pulmonary angiography (CTPA) is the current non-invasive imaging modality of choice to assess acute PE. Its advantages include accuracy, speed of image acquisition, and wide availability [2].

Filling defects in the pulmonary artery detected in CTPA examination represent direct signs of PE. Due to the intricate nature of the clinical diagnosis, specific individuals who are afflicted with an undetected pulmonary embolism may be subjected to unenhanced computed tomography of the thorax to assess various other cardiopulmonary ailments.

Patients exhibiting cardiopulmonary symptoms that do not indicate a pronounced clinical stigma of PE may benefit from an unenhanced thoracic CT scan in specific clinical situations. This supports the need to focus on non-obvious PE or pulmonary infarction (PI) signals on unenhanced CT [3].

The mosaic perfusion pattern or PI as the classic appearance of wedge-shaped, pleural-based consolidation without air bronchograms inside or the spontaneous hyperdense thrombus inside pulmonary arteries in an unenhanced study could be indirect signs of pulmonary embolism on unenhanced CT [3].

Reversed halo sign (RHS) was observed in 18% of patients with pulmonary embolism who had a lower-lung predominance, subpleural involvement, and pleural effusion. Researchers have also described RHS as a morphological manifestation of pulmonary infarction [3].

In immunocompromised patients, infections are more likely to cause RHS than non-infectious processes. In contrast, the reticular RHS pattern—rather than the nodular RHS pattern—typically correlates with PI in immunocompetent patients, resulting from a thromboembolic condition.

PI typically appears in the juxta pleural location and the lower lobes (81.8%) [4,5,6]. The presence of RHS on unenhanced pulmonary CT scans in the lower lobes’ juxta pleural posterior location, mainly when it is solitary, should prompt a suspicion for conditions other than infection or typical cryptogenic organizing pneumonia, like pulmonary infarction [7].

We reported a case of pulmonary embolism with pulmonary infarction with the reversed halo sign and internal reticulo-nodulation pattern.

Our case thus suggests that the RHS can offer the possibility of a pulmonary infarction presence in an adequate clinical environment, and consequently, it indicates the need to advance towards an angiographic CT imaging study of the pulmonary arteries.

Case presentation

A 47-year-old patient with glioblastoma, who was undergoing chemotherapy cycles, presented to our hospital’s emergency room with complaints of bilateral chest pain and dyspnea.

There were no clinical signs of hypoxia (SpO2 of 97% in ambient air), tachycardia (74 bpm), or hypertension/hypotension (105/70 mmHg). The Wells score results indicated a low risk of PE.

The results of the laboratory tests ruled out a compromised immune system and revealed elevated levels of fibrinogen (722 mg/dl), C-reactive protein (8 mg/dl), and D-dimer (1.904 ng/ml).

A large saddle embolus and extensive bilateral defects in the lobar artery filling were found on CT pulmonary angiography (Fig. 1), and the lung CT window revealed two reversed halo signs: one in the lower left lobe, with a juxta pleural location and an elliptical shape, and another in the lower right lobe, with a subpleural location (Fig. 2).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Axial (A, B, and C) and sagittal (D and F) CT angiography of pulmonary arteries shows extensive filling defects straddling the bifurcation of the pulmonary trunk, extending into the left and right pulmonary arteries. A volume rendering image of the pulmonary artery (E) shows amputation affecting the pulmonary artery in its lobar inferior branches bilaterally and an impression that straddles the bifurcation of the pulmonary trunk

Fig. 2
figure 2

Axial (A) CT angiography of the pulmonary artery shows filling defects in the left and right pulmonary arteries (yellow arrowheads). An axial HRCT scan of the lung base reveals two reversed halo signs: (B) one in the lower right lobe, with an elliptical shape and subpleural location (green arrowhead), and another (C) in the lower left lobe, with a wedge-shaped and juxtapleural location (green arrowhead). A nodular reticulum-type pattern is appreciable within both areas of RHS (B and C). In the right lower lung lobe, a pulmonary infarction without aspects of RHS is also evident (blue arrowhead in B)

As pulmonary infarcts, the reverse halo areas on CT pulmonary angiography did not exhibit perfusion (Fig. 3).

Fig. 3
figure 3

Axial CT images with parenchymal (A) and mediastinal (B and C) settings. RHS (blue arrowhead in A, B, and C) represents pulmonary infarction. The pulmonary infarction showed no enhancement after the contrast medium was introduced (blue arrowhead in B and C). At the same time, the neighbouring parenchyma with partial and lamellar atelectasis is vascularized (yellow arrowhead in C)

Within the reverse halo areas, a micronodular-reticulonodular pattern was visible in the ground-glass opacity (Fig. 4). Neither a pleural nor pericardial effusion was present. The remaining pulmonary parenchyma of both lungs shows no other significant alterations (Fig. 5).

Fig. 4
figure 4

On the CT lung window, in both areas of RHS, a micronodular pattern is evident in the ground-glass opacity inside the pulmonary infarcted area on lung window CT images

Fig. 5
figure 5

The CT windows of both lungs evaluated entirely in the axial (A, B, and C), sagittal (D and F), and coronal (E) planes do not show other significant parenchymal alterations

Discussion

The third most common cardiovascular condition is pulmonary artery embolism (PE), with acute right heart failure and/or lung infarction as a significant consequence [8].

Since lung consolidations suggestive of infarction may be the initial sign of acute PE, timely diagnosis of pulmonary infarction during life is crucial.

A cushion-like or hemispherical consolidation along the pleura strongly indicates pulmonary infarction, but when establishing a differential diagnosis, other conditions, such as pneumonia or lung cancer, must also be considered.

Pneumonic consolidations during the early stages of the disease or resolution may manifest as a more central consolidation at a distance from the pleura. At the same time, infarcts remain organized peripherally alongside the pleural surface.

Likewise, tumour masses are frequently situated at some distance from the pleura.

Sadly, the widely held misconception that a pulmonary infarction should only be triangular, with the apex pointing towards the pulmonary hilum, causes pulmonary infarctions to frequently be mistaken for pneumonia, granulomatous disease, or neoplasia [9].

Fleischner, Hampton, and Castleman subsequently noted that this is erroneous since sufficient collateral blood flow safeguards the apical region of an embolized lung from infarction [9].

Acute PE may result in partial or total blockage of the pulmonary vasculature, but the latter may also cause PI. On CTPA, PI manifests as ground-glass opacity with reticular changes or as a wedge-shaped consolidation with the truncated apex directed towards the hilum and the base towards the pleural surface (Hampton hump) without the presence of an air bronchogram [10]. Infarcts are usually multiple and, in 87%, unilateral [9]. Eighty-five per cent of them are located in the lower lobes, and the remaining fifteen per cent are equally split between the other lobes. In 82% of the cases, focal central hyperlucencies (bubbly consolidation) within the infarction have been observed [9, 10].

In addition to being linked to various pulmonary conditions, reversed halo sign (RHS) has also been linked to pulmonary infarction [11].

By using computed tomography angiography (CTA) of the pulmonary arteries, Mancano et al. described the incidence of the reversed halo sign (RHS) in patients with pulmonary infarction (PI) caused by acute pulmonary embolism (PE). They also described the RHS’s main morphological features, including areas of low attenuation and a typical single oval lesion in the right lower lobe subpleural location [4].

Marchiori et al. have demonstrated that lower lung predominance and pleural effusion also suggest PI and that a single RHS with low-attenuation areas inside the halo, with or without reticulation, highly suggest PI [5].

On the other hand, the patient’s immune status and the overall clinical presentation should be considered when interpreting reticulation inside the RHS halo. The RHS with reticulation in an immunocompromised patient highly suggests invasive fungal infection (IFI), especially angioinvasive pulmonary aspergillosis or pulmonary zygomycosis. In an immunocompetent patient, this feature is highly suggestive of PI [5]. It is crucial to remember that nodules on the halo’s wall or inside (nodular RHS) typically indicate active granulomatous diseases like sarcoidosis and tuberculosis to aid in differential diagnosis [12]. Reticulations within the reverse halo sign, which characterize the reticular pattern, have been linked to pulmonary infarctions in immunocompetent patients or invasive fungal diseases in immunocompromised patients [13]. Therefore, the nodular pattern is not typical or expected in pulmonary infarction.

Surprisingly, our case report found two pulmonary infarctions with the reverse halo sign involving the right and left lower lobes, with one presenting an oval and the other a triangular shape. Moreover, it is noteworthy that in both instances, the internal region of the RHS displayed a nodular reticulum pattern in an immunocompetent patient who had a pulmonary embolism, as shown by CT angiography of the pulmonary arteries.

Conclusions

The reversed halo sign on lung CT could indirectly indicate pulmonary infarction. Traditionally associated with pneumonia organization, the localization and distribution of RHS can suggest alternative diagnoses. In a pertinent clinical setting, identifying RHS on HRCT may indicate pulmonary infarction and require additional investigations, preferably with CT pulmonary angiography.

In immunocompetent patients, a micronodular or reticule-micronodular pattern within the RSH may indicate a pulmonary infarction rather than exclusively an active granulomatous disease; this awareness could help triage patients with RHS.

Availability of data and materials

Available on request.

Abbreviations

VTE:

Venous thromboembolic illness

PE:

Pulmonary embolism

CTPA:

Computed tomography pulmonary angiography

RHS:

Reversed halo sign

PI:

Pulmonary infarction

IFI:

Invasive fungal infection

HRCT:

High-resolution computed tomography

References

  1. Moore AJE, Wachsmann J, Chamarthy MR et al (2018) Imaging of acute pulmonary embolism: an update. Cardiovasc Diagn Ther 8(3):225–243. https://doi.org/10.21037/cdt.2017.12.01

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Sin D, McLennan G, Rengier F, Haddadin I et al (2021) Acute pulmonary embolism multimodality imaging prior to endovascular therapy. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 37(1):343–358. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-020-01980-9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Torres PPTES, Mançano AD, Zanetti G et al (2020) Multimodal indirect imaging signs of pulmonary embolism. Br J Radiol 93(1108):20190635. https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20190635

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Mançano AD, Rodrigues RS, Barreto MM et al (2019) Incidence and morphological characteristics of the reversed halo sign in patients with acute pulmonary embolism and pulmonary infarction undergoing computed tomography angiography of the pulmonary arteries. J Bras Pneumol 45(1):e20170438. https://doi.org/10.1590/1806-3713/e20170438

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Marchiori E, MennaBarreto M et al (2018) Morphological characteristics of the reversed halo sign that may strongly suggest pulmonary infarction. Clin Radiol 73(5):503.e7–503.e13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crad.2017.11.022

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Thomas R, Madan R, Gooptu M et al (2019) Significance of the reverse halo sign in immunocompromised patients. AJR Am J Roentgenol 213(3):549–554. https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.19.21273

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Schueremans T, Versavel M, Dubbeldam A (2023) The reversed halo sign in pulmonary infarction due to acute pulmonary embolism. J Belg Soc Radiol 107(1):71. https://doi.org/10.5334/jbsr.3243

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Kirchner J, Obermann A, Stückradt S et al (2015) Lung infarction following pulmonary embolism: a comparative study on clinical conditions and CT findings to identify predisposing factors. Rofo 187(6):440–444. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0034-1399006

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Miniati M, Bottai M, Ciccotosto C et al (2015) Predictors of pulmonary infarction. Medicine (Baltimore) 94(41):e1488. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000001488

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Gagno G, Padoan L, D’Errico S et al (2022) Pulmonary embolism presenting with pulmonary infarction: update and practical review of literature data. J Clin Med 11(16):4916. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11164916

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Godoy MC, Viswanathan C, Marchiori E et al (2012) The reversed halo sign: update and differential diagnosis. Br J Radiol 85(1017):1226–35. https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr/54532316

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Oliveira I, Carvalho J, Rosa R et al (2019) The reversed halo sign: not such a specific sign of organising pneumonia. Eur J Case Rep Intern Med. 6(11):001326. https://doi.org/10.12890/2019_001326

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Chiarenza A, Esposto Ultimo L, Falsaperla D et al (2019) Chest imaging using signs, symbols, and naturalistic images: a practical guide for radiologists and non-radiologists. Insights Imaging 10(1):114. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13244-019-0789-4

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

None.

Funding

Dr Totaro was co-funded by Next Generation EU, in the context of the National Recovery and Resilience Plan, Investment PE8 – Project Age-It: “Ageing Well in an Ageing Society”. This resource was co-financed by the Next Generation EU [DM 1557 11.10.2022] (Grant No. PE00000015-CUP H13C22000560006). The views and opinions expressed are only those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the European Union or the European Commission. Neither the European Union nor the European Commission can be held responsible for them.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

AP was involved in the conceptualization, supervision, investigation, and writing—original draft. AT contributed to the conceptualization, supervision, writing—original draft. BFPA assisted in the Investigation. SCa, AB and AV contributed to the investigation. SCi, GT and RB were involved in the supervision. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Antonio Totaro.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study does not require institutional review board approval.

Consent for publication

Informed consent is not available.

Competing interests

None of the authors have any relevant conflict of interest or industry support related to this report.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pierro, A., Totaro, A., Testa, G. et al. The reversed halo sign with a reticulonodular pattern as unusual findings of pulmonary infarct in acute pulmonary embolism: case report and literature review. Egypt J Radiol Nucl Med 55, 144 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s43055-024-01317-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s43055-024-01317-9

Keywords