RETRACTED ARTICLE: Evaluation of obstructed defecation syndrome (ODS) using magnetic resonance defecography (MRD)

Obstructed defecation syndrome is associated with varying combinations of a host of ano-rectal abnormalities, and no physical examination can demonstrate these abnormalities. The present study was aimed to evaluate the spectrum of various pelvic floor abnormalities in obstructed defecation syndrome (ODS). Of the total 302 patients imaged with age range of 18–72 years (mean age 54 years), 218 were females, and 84 were males. Ano-rectal junction descent was the commonest abnormality observed in 273 (90.3%) patients followed by rectocele (232) (76.8%), rectal intussusception (93) (30.7%), and cystocele (92) (30.4%). Cervical descent was observed in 78 (35.7%) of female patients. Spastic perineum was seen in 27 (8.9%) patients. MRD serves as single stop shop for demonstrating and grading a gamut of pelvic organ abnormalities underpinning ODS which in turn helps in choosing the best treatment plan for the patient.


Background
Constipation constitutes a major health concern globally especially among the aging population. Ten percent of Indians above the age of 50 years are found to have constipation. In the USA, constipation leads to 2.5 million physician visits per year [1]. A uniform and consistent definition for constipation has been elusive, and a slew of attempts have been made to arrive at a comprehensive definition of constipation that would encompass all the myriad symptoms and manifestations of constipation. Obstructed defecation syndrome (ODS) constitutes an important subset of patients of constipation. ODS has been defined by NICE (National Institute for health and Clinical Excellence) guidelines as inability to completely evacuate or expel fecal bolus in the presence of urge to defecate [2,3]. Repeated unsuccessful attempts at defecation, sense of incomplete fecal evacuation, and excessive straining at toilet pan adversely affecting the quality of life typifies this subset of constipated patients. These patients usually resort to digital maneuvers to attain rectal evacuation [3,4]. ODS is usually associated with varying combinations of a host of ano-rectal abnormalities, and no physical examination can demonstrate these abnormalities. Dynamic MRI imaging referred to as MRD is a single stop shop to demonstrate various pelvic floor and ano-rectal abnormalities underpinning ODS. This capability of MRD to evaluate defecation process dynamically helps in demonstration of various ano-rectal and pelvic floor abnormalities and thus allows colorectal surgeons to plan a comprehensive treatment for these patients [4,5]. This study was undertaken to evaluate ODS with MRD. The objective of this study was to demonstrate various pelvic floor and ano-rectal abnormalities associated with ODS.

R E T R
This was a prospective study. Patients fulfilling the clinical criteria for ODS as laid down in NICE guidelines were referred to our department for MRD by the colorectal division of surgery department. A total of 302 patients were evaluated over a period of 3 years from December 2016 to January 2020. The study was performed on 1.5 Tesla superconducting magnetic resonance imager (Magnetom Avanto, Siemens Medical System) using standard pelvic coil. All the patients were subjected to preliminary sigmoidoscopy or colonoscopy to rule out any organic cause of constipation like rectal or colonic neoplasm. Patients were thoroughly explained the procedure to ensure their cooperation. A written consent was obtained in each case. Two hundred and fifty millilitre of ultrasound jelly was instilled into the rectum using a rectal tube after putting the patient in left lateral position on the MRI table. Ultrasound jelly was chosen because of its ready availability and its high T2 contrast. Diapers were given to the patients to allow them to defecate on the MRI gantry. This ensures cleanliness of the gantry table and helps patients to save blushes and avoid unnecessary embarrassment. The imaging protocol consisted of preliminary T2 weighted axial and sagittal sequences {repetition time (TR)/echo time (TE) 2880 ms/89 ms; slice thickness of 3 mm; field of view 200 mm} to study the anatomy. Following this dynamic imaging was performed using TRUFI (True fast imaging with steady state free precession) sequence having a repetition time (TR) of 45.6 ms, echo time (TE) of 1.3 ms, slice thickness of 3 mm, and field of view 340 mm in sagittal plane during rest, squeeze, strain, and defecation (drain out) phases. Defecation or drain out phase was run for a sufficient time (approximately 1 to 2 min).The images were analyzed on an Apple work station by two radiologists possessing 9 and 10 years of experience respectively in abdominal radiology. The interpreting radiologists were blind to the clinical history of patients. MR defecography images were analyzed in mid-sagittal plane in cine mode using standard sagittal anatomical planes. Pubo-coccygeal line (PCL) was drawn from the inferior margin of pubis to the last coccygeal articulation (Fig. 1a). H (hiatal) line was drawn from the inferior margin of pubic symphysis to the posterior wall of ano-rectal junction (Fig. 1b). H line corresponds to the pelvic or levator hiatus. M line was drawn perpendicular to PCL line from the posterior end of H line (Fig. 1b). The PCL line defines the level of pelvic floor, and the abnormal descent of pelvic structures is diagnosed when a structure descends below PCL during straining or defecation. The ano-rectal angle is the angle measured between central axis of anal canal and posterior border of distal part of rectum. Ano-rectal angle is formed by the stretch of pubo-rectalis sling on the posterior ano-rectal junction (Fig. 1c). The position of ano-rectal junction, cervix, and bladder neck was studied in all the phases. Presence and degree of bladder, cervical, and ano-rectal junction descent below PCL were studied. Presence and degree of intussusception, rectocele, and enterocele were evaluated. Ano-rectal junction descent defined as abnormal descent of ano-rectal junction below pubo-coccygeal line is graded into mild (< 3 cm), moderate (3-6 cm), and severe (> 6 cm). Rectocele is defined as abnormal protrusion of the rectal wall beyond the expected rectal contour. It is graded into mild (< 2 cm), moderate (2-4 cm), and severe (> 4 cm). Abnormal caudal descent of bladder and cervix below pubo-coccygeal line is also graded into mild, moderate, and severe. Abnormal caudal descent of various pelvic structures is graded as per the standard classification given in Table 1. Invagination of rectal wall into its lumen is called rectal intussusception and is classified into mucosal intussusception or full thickness intussusception. When rectal intussusception extends outside anal verge, it is referred to as rectal prolapse. Enterocele is defined as caudal displacement of small bowel loops into the recto-vesical or recto-vaginal space. Various pelvic floor abnormalities were noted down. Defecation phase of MR defecography was compared with all the other three phases of defecation (i.e., rest, strain, and squeeze) combined together.
All patients included in this research gave written informed consent to publish the data contained within this study. The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Results
A total of 302 patients fulfilling the clinical criteria for ODS were studied with a mean age of 54 years (range 18-72 years). With regards to gender, 218 were females, and remaining 84 were males. Ano-rectal junction descent was commonest abnormality seen in 273

Discussion
Pelvic floor dysfunction is characterized by bladder, bowel, or sexual dysfunction with a variable combination of pelvic organ prolapse. It affects multiparous women more commonly than men. Obstetric damage to pelvic  floor structures like ilio-coccygeus muscle, pubococcygeus muscle, anal sphincter, endopelvic fascia, and pudendal nerve is believed to cause pelvic floor dysfunction in multiparous women. Obstructed defecation syndrome (ODS) constitutes a unique set of chronically constipated patients who fail to completely evacuate their rectum. These patients resort to excessive straining and digital maneuvering of rectum to attain complete rectal evacuation. ODS can result either from a functional abnormality or organic ano-rectal abnormality. Patients with functional abnormality can be treated with bio feedback therapy or psychotherapy, whereas those with an organic ano-rectal disorder respond to surgical correction [5]. The diagnostic armamentarium chiefly consists of fluoroscopic defecography and magnetic resonance defecography (MRD) [5][6][7]. MRD has the capability of demonstrating the various pelvic floor abnormalities with great accuracy. MRD serves as a one stop shop for studying the normal pelvic anatomy and the complete range of pelvic floor abnormalities. MRD lacks radiation exposure. MRD can be performed in sitting position using open configuration MRI or in supine position using closed configuration magnet [7]. MRD performed in supine position yields comparable results to that performed in sitting position for the reason that the straining forces applied during defecation are of sufficient magnitude to elicit the various pathologies [8,9]. Pelvic floor is divided into three compartments: anterior compartment comprises of bladder and urethra, middle compartment comprises of uterus and vagina, and the posterior compartment is comprised of ano-rectal canal [9,10]. However, all the three compartments work in unison, and combined disorders of pelvic floor are common and should be assessed simultaneously. Normal ano-rectal angle measures between 108°and 127° [11,12]. During normal defecation, the pubo-rectalis sling relaxes leading to widening of the ano-rectal angle by 15-20°so that the rectum and anal canal are aligned in a straight line to allow expulsion of fecal matter [13,14]. Failure of widening of ano-rectal angle during defecation with persistence of acute ano-rectal angle forms the basis for the diagnosis of spastic perineum syndrome (SPS) (Fig. 2) (Video 1). This disorder is also called as paradoxical pubo-rectalis syndrome (PPS). It results from failure of pubo-rectalis muscle to relax during defecation. In fact, there is paradoxical contraction of this muscle during defecation which prevents opening of ano-rectal angle during defecation with consequent failure of evacuation of feces. Thickening of pubo-rectalis muscle has been reported previously in literature in PPS Fig. 4 Rectocele. There is reduction in ano-rectal angle from 109°at rest (Fig.4a) to 92°during squeeze (b). During strain (c), there is ano-rectal junction descent (red star) with formation of anterior rectocele (white arrow). In defecation phase (d), there is further descent of ano-rectal junction (> 6 cm) with further enlargement of anterior rectocele (d). This highlights the value of defecation phase which elicits or adds to various pelvic floor abnormalities patients [12]. However, Liu et.al in their study concluded that though mean thickness of the pubo-rectalis muscle was more in patients with PPS than in patients without PPS, but the difference between groups was not statistically significant [15]. However, they reported a significant difference in apparent diffusion co-efficient (ADC) values of pubo-rectalis muscle between patients with PPS and patients without PPS which points to the fact that alteration in muscle microstructure might be the underlying mechanism for PPS [15]. Ano-rectal junction descent was the commonest abnormality encountered with 273 (90.3%) patients demonstrating various grades of ano-rectal junction descent (Fig. 3). Descent of anorectal junction can occur in isolation but frequently descent of the anterior, and middle compartment structures are also seen in association with it. This is frequently associated with feeling of incomplete evacuation resulting in further increase in straining during defecation and consequent neuropathic injury that may result in incontinence [12]. Anterior rectocele was second commonest abnormality observed in 232 (76.8%) (Fig. 4). Factors that increase the likelihood of developing a rectocele include birth trauma, hysterectomy, chronically increased intra-abdominal pressure, and increased age. Rectoceles assume clinical relevance when symptoms develop as they are responsible for obstructed defecation which usually requires vaginal or perineal digitations to attain rectal emptying [12]. Post defecation retention of jelly within rectocele fairly correlates with patient symptoms and is an important abnormality which usually necessitates digitization (Fig. 5b). Rectal intussusception is classified into mucosal intussusception or full thickness intussusception (Fig. 3d) (Video 2). This causes obstruction to the passage of feces. MR defecography is advantageous in discriminating between mucosal intussusception and full-thickness intussusception and is relevant in treatment planning. Mucosal intussusception can be treated with transanal excision of the redundant or prolapsing mucosa, whereas a rectopexy might be required for full-thickness intussusception [12]. Enterocele, defined as caudal displacement of small bowel loops into the recto-vesical or recto-vaginal space, occurs more commonly in patients who have undergone hysterectomy owing to disruption of pubo-cervical and rectovaginal portions of supporting endopelvic fascia. Enteroceles are more clearly demonstrable towards the end of defecation process because a fully loaded rectum does not allow sufficient space for descent of small bowel into pelvis [12,16,17]. It is vital to detect enterocele because it forms a contraindication for stapled transanal rectal resection (STARR) due to the potential danger to the herniated small bowel during this surgery [11,18]. Abnormal caudal descent of bladder and cervix below pubo-coccygeal line is also graded into mild, moderate, and severe (Fig. 5a). Abnormal pelvic floor descent grading can be easily remembered by the rule of 3 with descent of an organ below PCL by ≤ 3 cm mild descent, 3-6 cm moderate descent, and > 6 cm severe descent [8,12,13]. Defecation phase puts the maximum downward force on pelvic floor which helps in demonstration of a higher number of pelvic organ descents when compared to strain phase [15,19]. Ano-rectal junction descent was visible in 101 (36.9%) patients on strain phase which increased to 273 in defecation phase. Thus, defecation phase clearly has higher detection rate for ano-rectal junction descent [20]. Similarly, bladder and cervical descent were seen in 16 and 32 patients during strain phase and in 92 and 78 patients respectively during defecation or drain out phase. Defecation phase also identified an additional number 81 (34.9%) rectoceles when compared to strain phase. None of the patients showed intussusceptions during strain, and all the 93 patients of intussusception were identified during defecation phase. Also, we noted that the maximum depth or degree of an abnormality was visible during defecation phase (Fig. 4c, d). So clearly, the diagnostic yield of defecation phase is best among all the phases of defecation and this attests to the fact that defecation phase is the single most important phase to elicit the full range of pelvic floor abnormalities and must be included in magnetic resonance defecography (Video 3 and Video 4). This comes at a slightly higher cost of providing the patient with waterproof diaper and having to explain the patient to defecate on MRI table which might be little embarrassing to many patients.

Conclusion
A vast range of pelvic floor abnormalities existing in various combinations in ODS patients can be demonstrated and graded using MRD which in turn helps in choosing the best treatment plan for the patient. Defecation phase is the single most important phase of MRD and has the highest diagnostic yield and must be included in all MRD studies.