Skip to main content

Table 2 Distribution of the studied cases according to CE-MRI findings (N = 50)

From: Diffusion tensor imaging on 3-T MRI breast: diagnostic performance in comparison to diffusion-weighted imaging

MRI findings

 

N = 50

Background enhancement

N

%

 Minimal

22

44.0

 Mild

14

28.0

 Moderate

11

22.0

 Marked

3

6.0

 

N = 50

Mass

34

68.0

 

N. of cases (N = 34)

n. of masses (n = 84)

Shape

  Oval

11

18

  Round

2

8

  Irregular

21

58

Margins

  Circumscribed

13

26

  Irregular

10

26

  Speculated

11

32

Internal enhancement

  Homogenous

13

26

  Heterogeneous

17

43

  Dark internal septations

4

15

 

N = 50

Non-mass enhancement

N

%

 No

24

48.0

Yes

26

52.0

  Morphology

N = 26

   Clumped

21

80.8

   Homogenous

4

15.4

   Clustered ring

1

3.8

  Distribution

N = 26

   Segmental

12

46.0

   Regional

3

11.5

   Linear

9

34.5

   Focal

1

4.0

   Diffuse

1

4.0

 

N = 50

Dynamic curve

 Type I

19

38.0

 Type II

17

34.0

 Type III

14

28.0

Pectoralis muscle invasion

2

4.0

Axillary lymph nodes

 Reactive looking

29

58.0

 Malignant looking

17

34.0

 Equivocal

4

8.0

BIRADS

 1

0

0.0

 2

5

10.0

 3

11

22.0

 4

10

20.0

  4a

3

6.0

  4b

2

4.0

  4c

5

10.0

 5

8

16.0

 6

16

32.0

  1. More than one MRI finding can be in one patient. N number of cases, n number of lesions