Table 2 Distribution of the lesions integrated into the grading system, number of involved zones (n), and percentages (%) (n = 113, total zone = 678)
Grade 1 | Grade 2 | Grade 3 | Total | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CXR | CT | CXR | CT | CXR | CT | CXR | CT | |
RLZ | 26.5% (30) | 52.2% (59) | 20.4% (23) | 17.7% (20) | 14.2% (16) | 23.9% (27) | 61.0% (69) | 93.8% (106) |
RMZ | 23.9% (27) | 45.1% (51) | 12.4% (14) | 24.8% (28) | 10.6% (12) | 20.4% (23) | 46.9% (53) | 90.3% (102) |
RUZ | 8.0% (9) | 53.1% (60) | 5.3% (6) | 15.9% (18) | 5.3% (6) | 7.1% (8) | 18.6% (21) | 76.1% (86) |
LLZ | 24.8% (28) | 46.9% (53) | 15.9% (18) | 20.4% (23) | 10.6% (12) | 17.7% (20) | 51.3% (58) | 85.0% (96) |
LMZ | 13.3% (15) | 45.1% (51) | 8.0% (9) | 23.0% (26) | 9.7% (11) | 14.2% (16) | 31.0% (35) | 82.3% (93) |
LUZ | 4.4% (5) | 53.1% (60) | 2.7% (3) | 10.6% (12) | 5.3% (6) | 5.3% (6) | 12.4% (14) | 69.0% (78) |
Total | 16.8% (114) | 49.2% (334) | 11.6% (73) | 18.7% (127) | 9.2% (63) | 14.7% (100) | 36.9% (250) | 82.7% (561) |