Skip to main content

Table 2 Comparisons of clinical follow up results in different treatment approaches

From: Deconstructive versus reconstructive endovascular approaches for intracranial dissecting aneurysms

Follow up Treatment p value Sig
Parent artery occlusion Artery preserving technique Combined ttt
No. (%) No. (%) No. (%)
After 1 week (mRS assessment)
No disability (mRS 0) 3 (27.3%) 2 (28.6%) 0 (0%) 0.97 NS
No significant disability (mRS 1) 5 (45.5%) 3 (42.9%) 1 (100%)
Mild disability (mRS 2) 2 (18.2%) 1 (14.3%) 0 (0%)
Moderate to severe disability (mRS 3–4) 1 (9.1%) 1 (14.3%) 0 (0%)
After 3 months (clinical assessment)
No disability (mRS 0) 8 (72.7%) 2 (28.6%) 1 (100%) 0.37 NS
No significant disability (mRS 1) 2 (18.2%) 3 (42.9%) 0 (0%)
Mild disability (mRS 2) 1 (9.1%) 2 (28.6%) 0 (0%)