Table 2 Comparisons of clinical follow up results in different treatment approaches
From: Deconstructive versus reconstructive endovascular approaches for intracranial dissecting aneurysms
Follow up | Treatment | p value | Sig | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Parent artery occlusion | Artery preserving technique | Combined ttt | |||
No. (%) | No. (%) | No. (%) | |||
After 1 week (mRS assessment) | |||||
No disability (mRS 0) | 3 (27.3%) | 2 (28.6%) | 0 (0%) | 0.97 | NS |
No significant disability (mRS 1) | 5 (45.5%) | 3 (42.9%) | 1 (100%) | ||
Mild disability (mRS 2) | 2 (18.2%) | 1 (14.3%) | 0 (0%) | ||
Moderate to severe disability (mRS 3–4) | 1 (9.1%) | 1 (14.3%) | 0 (0%) | ||
After 3 months (clinical assessment) | |||||
No disability (mRS 0) | 8 (72.7%) | 2 (28.6%) | 1 (100%) | 0.37 | NS |
No significant disability (mRS 1) | 2 (18.2%) | 3 (42.9%) | 0 (0%) | ||
Mild disability (mRS 2) | 1 (9.1%) | 2 (28.6%) | 0 (0%) | ||