Skip to main content

Table 6 Relation between epicardial fat volume and segmental lesion (n = 120)

From: Relationship between epicardial fat volume measured by multi-detector computed tomography and coronary artery disease

 

N

Epicardial fat volume

t

p

Min.–Max

Mean ± SD

Median

LM

 No

103

53.0–270.0

148.6 ± 47.45

144.0

1.452

0.149

 Yes

17

106.0–243.0

166.1 ± 34.74

169.0

  

Ostio &proximal LAD

 No

56

53.0–250.0

138.5 ± 45.98

136.0

2.867*

0.005*

 Yes

64

89.0–270.0

162.1 ± 43.75

159.0

  

Ostio &proximal LCX

 No

102

53.0–270.0

148.2 ± 46.26

145.5

1.661

0.099

 Yes

18

89.0–247.0

167.6 ± 43.02

153.0

  

Ostio &proximal RCA

 No

97

53.0–270.0

147.3 ± 46.03

144.0

1.886

0.062

 Yes

23

90.0–247.0

167.2 ± 44.0

166.0

  

Mid-LAD

 No

85

53.0–264.0

143.1 ± 43.91

143.0

3.044*

0.003*

 Yes

35

90.0–270.0

170.4 ± 46.33

162.0

  

Mid-LCX

 No

116

53.0–270.0

150.7 ± 46.88

145.0

2.116*

0.048*

 Yes

4

152.0–166.0

162.5 ± 7.0

166.0

  

Mid-RCA

 No

106

53.0–270.0

148.6 ± 46.24

144.5

1.650

0.102

 Yes

14

89.0–247.0

170.1 ± 42.16

165.5

  

Distal LAD

 No

117

53.0–270.0

151.5 ± 46.54

149.0

0.686

0.494

 Yes

3

119.0–160.0

133.0 ± 23.39

120.0

  

Distal LCX

 No

117

53.0–270.0

151.1 ± 46.34

149.0

 Yes

1#

 

146.0

   

Distal RCA

 No

107

53.0–270.0

147.5 ± 46.10

144.0

2.504*

0.07

 Yes

13

136.0–247.0

180.7 ± 35.77

173.0

  

Ramus intermedius

 No

114

53.0–270.0

148.6 ± 44.49

145.0

2.618

0.06

 Yes

6

132.0–264.0

198.0 ± 56.16

186.0

  

D1

 No

105

53.0–270.0

148.7 ± 45.62

145.0

1.532

0.128

 Yes

15

113.0–247.0

168.1 ± 47.78

163.0

  

D2

 No

116

53.0–270.0

149.7 ± 46.03

145.5

1.753

0.082

 Yes

4

144.0–222.0

190.5 ± 33.01

198.0

  

OM First

 No

101

53.0–270.0

148.0 ± 48.29

143.0

2.439

0.083

 Yes

19

119.0–222.0

167.5 ± 27.94

163.0

  

PDA

 No

118

53.0–270.0

150.6 ± 46.28

145.5

0.831

0.408

 Yes

2

152.0–204.0

178.0 ± 36.77

178.0

  

PLB

 No

117

53.0–270.0

150.9 ± 46.70

145.0

0.325

0.746

 Yes

3

152.0–169.0

159.7 ± 8.62

158.0

  
  1. t: Student t-test; *Statistically significant at p ≤ 0.05; p: p value for comparing between Epicardial fat volume and different parameters
  2. #Cases were excluded from the comparison (due to small sample size)