Skip to main content

Table 3 Characterizations of lesions in tomosynthesis

From: Do automated breast ultrasound and tomosynthesis have an effective role in dense breast evaluation?

   Count %
ACR (TOMO) ACR A 0 0.0
ACR B 0 0.0
ACR C 32 84.2
ACR D 6 15.8
Shape (TOMO) Oval 10 26.3
Round 6 15.8
Irregular 19 50.0
No mass 3 7.9
Margin (TOMO) Circumscribed 14 36.8
Obscured 1 2.6
Microlobulated 1 2.6
Indistinct 2 5.3
Speculated 17 44.7
No mass 3 7.9
Density (TOMO) Fat 0 0.0
Low 6 15.8
Equal 5 13.2
High 27 71.1
Asymmetry (TOMO) No asymmetry 30 81.1
Global 6 16.2
Focal 1 2.7
Developing 0 0.0
Calcification (TOMO) No calcification 23 60.5
Bengin 3 7.9
Suspicious 12 31.6
Distribution of calcification (TOMO) No calcification 24 64.9
Diffuse 4 10.8
Regional 1 2.7
Grouped 8 21.6
Linear 0 0.0
Segmental 0 0.0
Nipple retraction (TOMO) Yes 6 16.2
No 31 83.8