Table 11 Comparison between patients with RVOTO and without RVOTO among 56 rTOF patients regarding CMR RV parameters
From: CMR parameters and CMR-FT in repaired tetralogy of Fallot
With RVOTO (n = 32) | Without RVOTO (n = 24) | Test of sig | p | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
RVEDVI (ml/m2) | ||||
Min.–Max | 80.0–330.0 | 76.0–278.0 | t = 0.245 | 0.807 |
Mean ± SD | 158.0 ± 61.67 | 161.67 ± 45.35 | ||
RVESVI(ml/m2) | ||||
Min.–Max | 30.0–165.0 | 28.0–132.0 | U = 314.0 | 0.246 |
Mean ± SD | 75.08 ± 36.03 | 80.83 ± 27.82 | ||
RVEF (%) | ||||
Min.–Max | 41.0–66.0 | 31.0–67.0 | t = 1.365 | 0.178 |
Mean ± SD | 53.53 ± 7.55 | 50.53 ± 8.89 | ||
Sax RV GCS % | ||||
Min.–Max | − 26.30 to − 9.80 | − 22.30 tp − 9.30 | U = 2.851* | 0.021* |
Mean ± SD | − 16.26 ± 4.27 | − 12.20 ± 3.78 | ||
Long axis RV GLS % | ||||
Min.–Max | − 28.60 to − 5.90 | − 31.30 to − 8.30 | t = 0.332 | 0.741 |
Mean ± SD | − 19.98 ± 4.83 | − 19.53 ± 5.26 | ||