Skip to main content

Table 4 Total number of viable, equivocal and nonviable observations in the second follow-up after 6 months

From: Can triphasic hepatic multislice CT validate the LI-RADS treatment response algorithm after trans-catheter arterial chemoembolization treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma?

 

Count

%

Therapy response 2

 LR-TR viable

16

16.0

 LR-TR equivocal

8

8.0

 LR-TR nonviable

76

76.0

Therapy response 2 (equivocal as viable)

 LR-TR viable + equivocal

24

24.0

 LR-TR nonviable

76

76.0

Therapy response 2 (equivocal as nonviable)

 LR-TR viable

16

16.0

 LR-TR nonviable + equivocal

48

84.0

Typical arterial enhancement 2

 Yes

12

12.0

 No

88

88.0

Atypical Arterial enhancement 2

 Yes

4

4.0

 No

96

96.0

Good response specific enhancement 2

 No

100

100.0

Delayed washout 2

 Yes

12

12.0

 No

44

88.0