Skip to main content
Egyptian Journal of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine
Fig. 3 | Egyptian Journal of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine

Fig. 3

From: Diagnostic accuracy of subjective kinetic assessment of masses in contrast-enhanced mammography in comparison with contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging

Fig. 3

Images of a 55-year-old lady with a right breast lump. A Low energy images of both breasts in craniocaudal (CC) and mediolateral oblique (MLO) projections show an irregular mass with spiculated margins in the upper central quadrant of the right breast (marked by white circle). B Postcontrast recombined images of both breasts show heterogeneous enhancement of the right breast mass with high conspicuity. Also note the heterogeneous nonmass enhancement in linear distribution posteromedial to the mass. C Postcontrast recombined images of the mass show high density of the lesion in CC image at 2 min with no significant change in density in MLO (4 min) and delayed (8 min) views suggestive of type 2 kinetics. D Postcontrast subtraction maximum intensity projection (MIP) MR images at 2 min and at 5 min show early intense enhancement with no significant change in signal intensity at 5 min—consistent with type 2 kinetics. Time intensity curve confirms the same. Biopsy was invasive lobular carcinoma

Back to article page