Skip to main content

Table 3 Association of CEM characteristics with malignant AD

From: Novel scoring system using contrast-enhanced mammography to differentiate benign and malignant architectural distortion

Characteristics

 

Benign

Malignant

Sensitivity (%)

Specificity (%)

PPV# (%)

NPV* (%)

2D/Tomosynthesis detected

DBT detected

25/32

(78.13%)

5/17

(29.41%)

70.6

78.1

63.2

83.3

2D and DBT detected

7/32

(21.87%)

12/17

(70.59%)

Enhancement

Absent

9/32

(28.12%)

0/17

(0%)

100

28.12

42.5

100

Present

23/32

(71.88%)

17/17

(100%)

Density of enhancement

Absent/mild

26/32

(81.25%)

2/17

(11.76%)

88.2

81.3

71.4

92.9

Moderate/marked

6/32

(18.75%)

15/17

(88.24%)

Enhancement Size (in cm)

≤ 0.95

17/23

(73.92%)

5/17

(29.41%)

70.6

73.9

66.7

77.3

 > 0.95

6/23

(26.08%)

12/17

(70.59%)

Contrast/Tomo (C/T) ratio

≤ 1.31

20/23

(86.96%)

4/17

23.53%)

76.5

87

81.3

83.3

 > 1.31

3/23

(13.04%)

13/17

(76.47%)

Enhancing morphology

Non-mass enhancement

21/23

(91.30%)

4/17

(23.53%)

76.5

91.3

86.7

84

Mass

2/23

(8.70%)

13/17

(76.47%)

Relative change in density—early versus delayed

Increase/no change

23/23

(100%)

9/17

(52.95%)

47.1

100

100

71.9

Decrease

0/23

(0%)

8/17

(47.05%)