Table 2 Efficacy of percutaneous ultrasonography-guided hepatic intervention using both 2D convex probe (group A) and 3D X matrix probe (group B)
From: Added value of 3D ultrasound image-guided hepatic interventions by X matrix technology
| Â | (Group A) 2D | (Group B) 3D | X2 | p value | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
No | % | No | % | |||
RFA | ||||||
 Complete response | 15 | 75 | 16 | 80 | 0.14337 | 0.705 |
 Partial response | 5 | 25 | 4 | 20 |  |  |
MWA | ||||||
 Complete response | 13 | 86.70% | 14 | 93.30% | 0.37037 | 0.5428 |
 Partial response | 2 | 13.30% | 1 | 6.70% |  |  |
PEI | ||||||
 Complete response | 8 | 80% | 9 | 90% | 0.39216 | 0.5312 |
 Partial response | 2 | 20% | 1 | 10% |  |  |
Ultrasound-guided biopsy and ultrasound-guided drainage | ||||||
 Adequate biopsy and adequate drainage | 4 | 80% | 5 | 100% | 1.11111 | 0.2918 |
 Inadequate biopsy or drainage | 1 | 20% | 0 | 0% |  |  |