Skip to main content

Table 7 Comparison of the diagnostic indices of CEDM and DCE-MRI in the detection of ILC multiplicity

From: A comparative study between the diagnostic performance of contrast-enhanced digital mammography and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI in invasive lobular carcinoma of the breast

Statistics

Combined conventional mammography and ultrasound

CEDM

MRI

Value (95% CI)

Value (95% CI)

Value (95% CI)

Sensitivity

19% (5.45–41.91%)

85.71% (63.66–96.95%)

100.00% (83.89% –100.00%)

Specificity

96.00% (79.65–99.90%)

96.00% (79.65–99.90%)

92.00% (73.97–99.02%)

Positive predictive value (*)

78.91% (31.14–96.87%)

94.39% (71.00–99.14%)

90.76% (72.22–97.38%)

Negative predictive value (*)

60.15% (54.72–65.34%)

89.53% (74.94–96.07%)

100.00% (83.89% –100.00%)

Accuracy (*)

62.14% (46.64–76.02%)

91.47% (79.43–97.67%)

95.52% (84.97–99.43%)

  1. CEDM; Contrast-enhanced digital mammography, MRI; magnetic resonance imaging