Table 8 Comparison of the diagnostic indices of CEDM and DCE-MRI in the detection of bilaterality
Statistic | Combined conventional mammography and ultrasound | CEDM | MRI |
|---|---|---|---|
Value (95% CI) | Value (95% CI) | Value (95%CI) | |
Sensitivity | 75.00% (19.41–99.37%) | 80.00% (28.36–99.49%) | 100% (39.76–100.00%) |
Specificity | 95.24% (83.84–99.42%) | 90.24% (76.87–97.28%) | 92.86% (80.52–98.50%) |
Positive predictive value (*) | 60.00% (25.72–86.66%) | 50.00% (26.33–73.67%) | 57.14% (30.94–79.87%) |
Negative predictive value (*) | 97.56% (87.98–99.54%) | 97.37% (86.47–99.54%) | 100% |
Accuracy (*) | 93.48% (82.10–98.63%) | 89.13% (76.43–96.38%) | 93.48% (82.10–98.63%) |