Skip to main content

Table 4 Classification results attained for nine different State-of-art classifiers using two FTFS techniques

From: Proficiency evaluation of shape and WPT radiomics based on machine learning for CT lung cancer prognosis

Feature selection algorithm

Classifiers

(Malignant vs Benign)

AUROC

Accuracy

Sensitivity/Recall/TPR

Precision/PPV

Specificity/TNR

ANOVA

FGSVM

0.883

0.837

0.978

0.83

0.453

MGSVM

0.904

0.864

0.923

0.895

0.706

CGSVM

0.895

0.827

0.917

0.856

0.579

Decision Trees

0.878

0.856

0.91

0.895

0.709

Ensemble Boosted Trees (BOCET)

0.905

0.866

0.917

0.902

0.727

Ensemble Bagged Trees (BACET)

0.910

0.866

0.905

0.912

0.761

Ensemble RUSBoosted Trees (RUSBOCET)

0.914

0.852

0.861

0.932

0.829

Ensemble Subspace Discriminant

0.902

0.843

0.948

0.854

0.559

Ensemble Subspace KNN

0.909

0.869

0.929

0.896

0.706

Chi-Square test

FGSVM

0.911

0.865

0.957

0.872

0.615

MGSVM

0.910

0.904

0.93

0.941

0.824

CGSVM

0.910

0.869

0.922

0.901

0.723

Decision Tree

0.883

0.857

0.926

0.885

0.67

Ensemble Boosted Trees (BOCET)

0.923

0.877

0.923

0.91

0.75

Ensemble Bagged Trees (BACET)

0.929

0.891

0.935

0.918

0.772

Ensemble RUSBoosted Trees (RUSBOCET)

0.925

0.861

0.869

0.937

0.84

Ensemble Subspace Discriminant

0.911

0.86

0.948

0.872

0.621

Ensemble Subspace KNN

0.896

0.865

0.93

0.891

0.689

  1. Overall highest values are marked in bold