Skip to main content

Systemic sclerosis: correlation between lung abnormalities on high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) and pulmonary function tests (PFTs)

Abstract

Background

Systemic sclerosis is a connective tissue disease that affects multiple systems and causes fibrosis of the skin and internal organs. There are two ways in which the lungs can be involved in patients with systemic sclerosis, either isolated pulmonary hypertension or interstitial lung fibrosis. The purpose of this study is to correlate the high resolution CT findings with pulmonary function tests in patients with systemic sclerosis to evaluate the severity of lung changes.

Results

Significant inverse correlations were found between the maximal extent radiological score, maximal severity radiological score as well as total (global) radiological score on one hand and the pulmonary function tests on the other hand

Conclusion

The combination of high resolution CT and pulmonary function tests are recommended for better assessment of the extent and severity of systemic sclerosis associated interstitial lung disease.

Background

Systemic sclerosis (SSc) is a connective tissue disease that affects multiple systems and causes fibrosis of the skin and internal organs. Its etiology till now is unknown. This disease causes widespread damage to small and large blood vessels [1].

There are two ways in which the lungs can be involved in patients with systemic sclerosis, either isolated pulmonary hypertension or interstitial lung fibrosis. Lung affection is common and is probably the main cause of mortality in scleroderma patients [1].

Interstitial lung disease in systemic sclerosis (SSc) patients is common in both forms of the disease (diffuse cutaneous and limited cutaneous). The disease is diagnosed at an advanced stage most of the time and this is probably due to the insidious onset of the disease accompanied by subtle clinical symptoms; at that point, the lung has become extensively fibrosed [2].

High-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) plays a major part in diagnosing interstitial lung disease in SSc patients. Its benefit lies more in assessing the extent of the disease [3].

Generally non-specific interstitial pneumonia (NSIP) is the commonest pattern detected in systemic sclerosis patients with more ground glass opacities than coarse reticulation detected. Usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP) can also be present [4, 5].

In clinical practice, pulmonary function tests (PFTs) are vital for assessing interstitial lung disease in scleroderma patients. Forced vital capacity is considered a core outcome measure. However, they are not without limitations [2].

Patients with abnormal pulmonary function tests (spirometry) results may show normal high-resolution computed tomography findings [5].

Over the span of the past two decades, various systems for examining and quantifying interstitial lung disease in systemic sclerosis have been developed. Scoring methods utilize clinical information to characterize and quantify the disease, determine the progression of the disease and its response to therapy. (One of these methods uses semi-quantitative scoring which is developed in order to supply a more accurate assessment regarding interstitial lung disease abnormalities [1, 6].

Aim of the work

The aim of this study is to correlate the HRCT findings with pulmonary function tests in patients with systemic sclerosis to evaluate the severity of lung changes.

Methods

Thirty patients diagnosed with progressive systemic sclerosis were enrolled in this cross-sectional study during the period from October 2017 to December 2018.

The diagnosis has been established according to the 2013 American College of Rheumatology (ACR) classification criteria for SSC [7] (Table 1).

Table 1 The American College of Rheumatology/European League against Rheumatism criteria for the classification of systemic sclerosis

They were referred to the radiology department to do HRCT from the rheumatology, chest, internal medicine, and dermatology departments, as well as, the outpatient clinic of rheumatology.

Patients were also sent to the pulmonary function unit–chest department to do pulmonary function tests.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients diagnosed with SSc older than 18 years regardless the gender presenting with chest symptoms and/or previous radiological findings suggestive of interstitial lung affection.

Exclusion criteria

  • Smokers.

  • Patients with mixed connective tissue diseases (MCTD).

  • Patients unable to hold full inspiration during the exam.

Clinical assessment

  • Full history taking

  • General and chest clinical examination

  • Routine laboratory investigations and sputum analysis when needed.

HRCT

The scans were performed using a Somatom, Emotion Siemens, 16-MDCT scanner.

Patients were scanned in supine position during full inspiration. No intravenous contrast administered.

The scout was taken in supine position, 130 kV, 25 mA during holding breath in full inspiration.

Scans were obtained during full inspiration in supine position using the following parameters; 130 kV, 78 mAs, 5 mm beam collimation, 1.25 pitch, 0 gantry tilt and the FOV depending on patient’s size. Total exposure time was 8–10 s. The scans covered the whole thorax from root of the neck to below diaphragm.

Following acquisition, the acquired images were transferred to dedicated post-processing workstation and volumetric measurements were obtained by applying the multiplanar reformation function at slice thickness of 5 mm.

Complementary mediastinal images were taken.

Scoring parameters

The scans were examined by 3 radiologists of 20, 10, and 3 years of experience. The reported parenchymal findings were documented and coded. Each patient was given a maximal extent, maximal severity and global scores guided by Warrick’s semi-quantitative scoring method used by Warrick et al. [6], Orlandi l et al. [8], Afeltra et al. [9], Camiciottoli et al. [10], Yiannopoulos et al .[11], Bellia et al. [12], Savarino et al. [13], and Daoussis D et al. [14] (Table 2).

Table 2 Semi-quantitative scoring method: Warrick et al. [6]

Warrick’s semi-quantitative scoring method depends on 5 HRCT abnormalities; ground-glass opacities, irregular pleural margin, septal or subpleural lines, honeycombing, and subpleural cyst.

Concerning the severity, it depends on the mere presence of abnormalities regardless of how many bronchopulmonary segments. Each finding was assigned a grade then they were added to get a maximal severity score. The highest score that can be assigned to one case is 15 if all abnormalities are present.

While the extent score is calculated according to the total number of bronchopulmonary segments involved by each abnormality. The maximal extent score is calculated by adding the grade for each abnormality with maximal score of 15 if every abnormality is present in more than 9 bronchopulmonary segments.

Both scores combined to obtain the global score.

The global score = maximal severity score + maximal extent score. The maximum score for any case is 30.

Pulmonary function tests

All patients performed PFTs using Master Screen PFT pro Care fusion Germany 234 GmbH in the pulmonary function unit–Chest Department.

Each patient performed a standard forced vital capacity maneuver (FVC), inspiring fully to total lung capacity (TLC), then exhaling as rapidly and forcibly as possible to residual volume (RV) and to complete the loop. Then, he/she inspires as rapidly as possible from the maximal expiratory level back to maximal inspiration.

Volume is plotted on the horizontal X axis, and flow is plotted on the vertical Y axis [15].

Statistical methods and data analysis

Data was entered on the computer using “Microsoft Office Excel Software” program (2010) for windows.

Data was then transferred to the Statistical Package of Social Science Software program, version 23 (IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 23.0. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp.) to be statistically analyzed.

Data presented using range, mean, standard deviation, median and interquartile range for quantitative variables and frequency and percentage for qualitative ones.

Pearson correlation coefficients calculated to assess the association between extent, severity and global scores with different pulmonary functions. P values less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant. Figures were used to illustrate some information.

Results

Thirty patients diagnosed with systemic sclerosis were included in our study; 28 females and 2 males. Their age range from 22 to 60 years old with mean age of 41.4 ± 11 SD.

All patients had clinical symptoms suggestive of interstitial lung disease. Dyspnea was the primary chest complaint seen in 96.7% of cases (Table 3).

Table 3 Different symptoms and signs in systemic sclerosis cases in the study

HRCT findings

Warrick’s semi-quantitative scoring method depends on 5 HRCT abnormalities; ground-glass opacities, irregular pleural margin, septal or subpleural lines, honeycombing and subpleural cysts (Figs. 1, 2, 3, and 4).

Fig. 1
figure 1

A 43-year-old female patient presenting with progressive dyspnea. ac Axial, coronal, and sagittal reformatted images of HRCT chest (lung window) showing interstitial lung disease in the form of bilateral fairly symmetrical predominantly subpleural ground glass opacification, thickening of interlobular and intralobular septae with traction bronchiectasis and bronchiolectasis and bilateral lower lobar reduced volume. Patulous esophagus is also noted on axial and coronal HRCT scans. d Axial mediastinal window showing prominent main pulmonary artery (about 3 cm) and enlarged prevascular lymph nodes

Fig. 2
figure 2

A 43-year-old female patient presenting with progressive dyspnea. ac Axial, coronal and sagittal reformatted images of HRCT chest (lung window) showing bilateral fairly symmetrical predominantly basal and subpleural ground glass opacification, thickening of interlobular, and intralobular septae with traction bronchiectasis and bronchiolectasis mounting to honeycombing. d Axial mediastinal window showing prominent main pulmonary artery and patulous esophagus showing air fluid level; findings impressive of interstitial lung disease (ILD) in the form of usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP)

Fig. 3
figure 3

A 46-year-old female patient diagnosed with systemic sclerosis presenting with progressive dyspnea. ac Axial, coronal and sagittal reformatted images of HRCT chest (lung window) showing bilateral fairly symmetrical predominantly subpleural with relative sparing of direct subpleural region ground glass opacification, thickening of interlobular and intralobular septae, traction bronchiectasis and bronchiolectasis, and bilateral lower lobar reduced volume. d Axial mediastinal window showing dilated main pulmonary artery denoting pulmonary hypertension and patulous esophagus showing air fluid level; findings impressive of interstitial lung disease (ILD) in the form of non-specific interstitial pneumonia (NSIP)

Fig. 4
figure 4

A 22-year-old female patient diagnosed with systemic sclerosis presenting with progressive dyspnea. ac Axial, coronal and sagittal reformatted images of HRCT chest (lung window) showing bilateral fairly symmetrical predominantly lower lobar and subpleural ground glass opacities and subpleural reticulations with reduced volume of both lower lung lobes. Bilateral predominantly lower lobar variable sized cysts are noted; findings impressive of interstitial lung disease (ILD) in the form of lymphocytic interstitial pneumonia (LIP)

Global score guided by Warrick scoring system: 28

Global score guided by Warrick scoring system: 27

Global score guided by Warrick scoring system: 26

Global score guided by Warrick scoring system: 25

HRCT fibrotic parenchymal abnormalities considered in the semi-quantitative method of Warrick’s scoring system are demonstrated in chart (Fig. 5). Ground-glass opacification was the most common findings seen in 93.3% of the cases followed by septal/subpleural lines seen in 60% of cases.

Fig. 5
figure 5

Chart demonstrating the percentage of the semi-quantitative scoring system related fibrotic abnormalities among the systemic sclerosis cases in the study

After analyzing the HRCT images guided by the semi-quantitative method of Warrick’s scoring system, maximal extent, maximal severity, and maximal global scores of fibrosis were calculated for each patient (Tables 4 and 5).

Table 4 Description of extent and severity score findings
Table 5 Description of Score findings (range, mean, and median)

Results of the extent and severity of ILD showed that ground glass opacification is the most common finding in our patients with 56% of patients showing more than 9 bronchopulmonary segments involvement ( score 3), followed by septal-subpleural lines with 30% of patients showing (score 3).

The total Warrick score of the patients involved in our study was 11.5 ± 8.1 [mean ± standard deviation (SD)].

SD standard deviation, IQR interquartile range (range between 25th and 75th percentiles)

Different forms of interstitial lung disease (ILD) were detected in twenty patients (66.6%). Numbers and percentages of different types of ILD are shown in Table 6.

Table 6 Different patterns of ILD

Other findings in the HRCT scans are demonstrated in chart (Fig. 6).

Fig. 6
figure 6

Chart showing other finding in HRCT scans

Dilated pulmonary artery (2.9 cm or more) was noted in 40% of patients suggesting the possibility of pulmonary arterial hypertension.

Pulmonary function tests (PFTs) findings

All patients underwent pulmonary function testing (spirometry), with emphasis on forced vital capacity (FVC), forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) and FEV1%FVC (Table 7).

Table 7 Description of PFTs (spirometry)

According to PFT (spirometry) values, the majority of the patients in the study showed mild restriction (36.7%) and moderate restriction (36.7%) equally (Fig. 7), while 33.3% of patients showed airway obstruction (mild, moderate or severe (Fig. 8).

Fig. 7
figure 7

Percentage of restriction in systemic sclerosis patients in the study according to spirometry values

Fig. 8
figure 8

Percentage of airway obstruction in systemic sclerosis patients in the study according to spirometry values

Correlations between HRCT scores and PFTs

Maximum extent, severity, and global scores for all patients were correlated with spirometry results and demonstrated in (Tables 8, 9, and 10) (Figs. 9, 10, and 11).

Table 8 Correlation of maximal extent score with pulmonary function (spirometry)
Table 9 Correlation of maximal severity score with pulmonary functions (spirometry)
Table 10 Correlation of global score with pulmonary functions (spirometry)
Fig. 9
figure 9

a Correlation between maximal extent score and predicted (FVC). b Predicted (FEV1). c Best (FEV1%FVC)

Fig. 10
figure 10

a Correlation between maximal severity score and predicted (FVC). b Predicted (FEV1). c Best (FEV1%FVC)

Fig. 11
figure 11

a Correlation between global score and predicted (FVC). b Predicted (FEV1). c Best (FEV1%FVC)

Significant inverse correlations were found between the maximal extent radiological score and lung-function (spirometry) parameters [predicted FVC: r = − 0.540, p = 0.002; predicted forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1): r = − 0.525, p = 0.003; best forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1): r = − 0.430, p = 0.018 (Table 8, Fig. 9).

There was no significant correlation between the maximal extent score and the rest of the PFT (spirometry) parameters.

Significant inverse correlations were found between the maximal severity radiological score and lung-function (spirometry) parameters [predicted FVC: r = − 0.421, p = 0.020; predicted forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1): r = − 0.398, p = 0.029; best FEV1 % FVC: r = − 0.366, p = 0.046; percentage B/P of FEV1 % FVC: r = − 0.373, p = 0.042 (Table 9, Fig. 10).

There was no significant correlation between the maximal severity score and the rest of the PFT (spirometry) parameters.

Significant inverse correlations were found between the total (global) radiological score and lung-function (spirometry) parameters [predicted FVC: r = − 0.486, p = 0.006; predicted forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1): r = − 0.466, p = 0.009; best of (FEV1 % FVC): r = – 0.364, p = 0.048; percentage B/P of FEV1%FVC: r = – 0.368, p=0.045 (Table 10, Fig. 11).

There was no significant correlation between the global score and the rest of the PFT (spirometry) parameters.

Discussion

Systemic sclerosis (SSc) is a connective tissue disease affecting multiple organs within the human body, especially the lungs. It is defined by dysfunction of the endothelium of blood vessels leading to vasculopathy of small vessels and a disturbance in the fibroblastic function ending in exaggerated collagen formation and fibrosis of the skin and internal organs [16].

The commonest causes of morbidity and mortality in patients suffering from SSc are interstitial lung disease (ILD) and pulmonary hypertension [4, 17]. ILD is a frequent pulmonary manifestation of SSc [18]. Roughly forty percent of patients suffering from SSc have some degree of ILD [19].

This study involved reviewing the HRCT scans of 30 patients which were referred to radiology department kasr Al-Aini due to their chronic chest complaint. All patients were known cases of SSc presenting with dyspnea and cough.

This study involved 30 patients; 28 females and 2 males which were in agreement with the study done by Bellia et al. [12] that involved 31 patients; 30 females and 1 male.

Twenty patients in our study (66.6%) manifest some form of ILD which is consistent with Tardella et al. [20]. Different forms of ILD were detected in the form of either NSIP in 13 (65%) of the patients, UIP 5 (25%) of patients, and 2 patients (10%) had ILD in the form of lymphocytic interstitial pneumonitis (LIP) which were very close to the results produced by Wells [21], stating that NSIP was found in 78%, UIP was found in 8% of the patients and also in agreement with the study done by Zompatori et al. [22] where 14 out 16 cases with ILD exhibited an NSIP pattern, while only 2 showed a UIP pattern; therefore, establishing NSIP as the commonest ILD pattern in SSc.

The most common abnormalities indicative of fibrosis reported on HRCT in this study were ground glass opacification (93.3%) followed by septal/subpleural lines (60%), honeycombing (33.3%), irregular pleural margins (33.3%), and subpleural cysts (30%). These results are close to the study done by Hafez et al. [23] which showed ground glass opacification in (83.3%) followed by septal/subpleural lines in (56.7%), honeycombing in (43.3%) bronchiolectasis in (23.3%) of the patients. Our results were also in agreement with the study done by Shah et al. [24] which shows ground glass as the leading abnormality in SSc present in 66% of their patients. while a study done by De Oliveira Jezler et al. [25] yielded different results showing bronchiolectasis as the most common HRCT abnormality found in (83.3%) of patients followed by honeycombing (80%), ground-glass opacity (66.7%), and septal/subpleural lines (20%).

Bronchiolectasis was found in 11 (36.6%) of the patients in our study which was not in agreement with the study done by Pontana et al. [26], as their study showed bronchiolectasis in 27 (49%) of their patients. This could be due to the fact that their study involved more patients (55) than ours.

This study showed traction bronchiectasis in 6 (20%) of the patients which was consistent with studies by Tillie-Leblond et al. [27] and by Burt et al. [28] being seen in 7 (22%) out of 32 patients and in 7 (10%) out of 90 patients, respectively. Although according to Ferguson et al. [29], traction bronchiectasis is considered to be one of the predominant abnormalities found on HRCT scans.

This study showed that 12 (40%) of the patients exhibited a pulmonary artery diameter more than 2.9 cm on HRCT suggestive of pulmonary arterial hypertension which was in agreement with Capobianco et al. [30] who stated that 10 (33%) of SSc patients had a dilated pulmonary artery. However, our study was not consistent with another study done by Zompatori et al. [22] which showed that 41 (95%) of the studied patients exhibited a pulmonary artery diameter > 2.9 cm. This dilatation could be considered primary as a result of pulmonary vascular abnormalities unrelated to SSc or it could be a secondary cause due to SSc-ILD.

Mediastinal lymph nodes were found in 23 (76.7%) patients which was not consistent with the study done by Tumsatan et al. [31] that showed mediastinal lymphadenopathy in 56.7% of the patients and this could be due to the discrepancy in the number of patients.

This study showed 2 (6.6%) patients with pleural effusion which agreed with the study done by Tillie-Leblond et al. [27] which showed that 3 (9.3%) of patients showed pleural effusion. Also, 7 (23.3%) of our patients showed pericardial effusion and this was close to the study done by Meune et al. [32] which showed pericardial effusion in 16 (30%) of their patients.

Esophageal dilatation is commonly detected in individuals with SSc on HRCT scans. It was stated by Leipsic et al. [33] that a patulous esophagus is often observed in 58 to 80% of individuals suffering from SSc and that this finding suggests a diagnosis of SSc. This was consistent with our study which revealed dilated esophagus in 76.7% of patients.

This study was done to determine the importance of HRCT in diagnosing and defining the type and degree of anatomical destruction brought on by systemic sclerosis. To determine the degree of lung fibrosis caused by SSc, the Warrick semi-quantitative scoring system was utilized.

A significant inverse correlation of moderate strength between the Warrick score and predicted FEV1 (r = − 0.466, p = 0.009) was shown being consistent with the study done by Bellia et al. [12] which showed (r = − 0.36, p = 0.05) and Ooi et al. [34] which showed (r = − 0.43, p = 0.008), also with the study done by Zompatori et al. [22] which showed p = 0.01.

This study showed also a significant inverse correlation of moderate strength between the Warrick score and FVC (r = − 0.486, p = 0.006) which was similar to the study done by Ooi et al. [34] which yielded results in the form of (r = − 0.43, p = 0.008). Our results were also similar to the study done by Yilmaz et al. [17] which showed significant correlations between the Warrick score and FVC.

This study also showed a significant inverse correlation between the Warrick score and FEV1%FVC (r = − 0.36, p = 0.048); however, there are no available studies to corroborate these findings.

In this study, there was no significant correlation between the Warrick score (global score) and FVC%; however, a study done by Cakmak et al. [1] yielded different results, as they managed to establish a negative correlation between the Warrick score and FVC% (r = − 0.28, p = 0.026). This could be due to the smaller number of patients in our study in comparison to theirs.

We were not able to correlate the rest of the pulmonary function components with the Warrick HRCT scoring system which includes TLC and DLCO in addition to the spirometry values present in our study due to limited availability regarding these particular tests at our institute.

Conclusion

This study showed a significant inverse correlation between the HRCT Warrick scoring system and spirometric indices (FVC, FEV1, and FEV1%FVC).

The combination of HRCT and PFTs (spirometry) testing are recommended for better assessment of the extent and severity of SSc-ILD.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the study are available upon reasonable request.

Abbreviations

ACR:

American College of Rheumatology

DLCO:

Diffusing capacity of the lungs for carbon monoxide

FEV1:

Forced expiratory volume in 1 s

FOV:

Field of view

FVC:

Forced vital capacity

HRCT:

High-resolution computed tomography

ILD:

Interstitial lung disease

LIP:

Lymphocytic interstitial pneumonitis

MDCT:

Multidetector computed tomography

NSIP:

Non-specific interstitial pneumonia

PFTs:

Pulmonary function tests

RV:

Residual volume

SD:

Standard deviation

SPSS:

Statistical Package for the Social Science

SSc:

Systemic sclerosis

TLC:

Total lung capacity

UIP:

Usual interstitial pneumonia

References

  1. Cakmak G, Can TS, Gundogdu S et al (2016) Relationship between abnormalities on high-resolution computerized tomography, pulmonary function, and bronchoalveolar lavage in progressive systemic sclerosis. Sarcoidosis Vasculitis and Diffuse Lung Disease 33(4):349–354

    Google Scholar 

  2. Hoffmann Vold AM, Aaløkken TM, Lund MB et al (2015) Predictive Value of Serial High-Resolution Computed Tomography Analyses and Concurrent Lung Function Tests in Systemic Sclerosis: SERIAL LUNG ANALYSES IN SSc. Arthritis & Rheumatology 67(8):2205–2212

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Wells, A.U. (2008). High-resolution computed tomography and scleroderma lung disease. Rheumatology, 47(Supplement 5), v59–v61.

  4. Schoenfeld SR, Castelino FV (2015) Interstitial Lung Disease in Scleroderma. Rheumatic Disease Clinics of North America 41(2):237–248

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Solomon, J.J., Olson, A.L., Fischer, A., et al (2013). Scleroderma lung disease.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  6. Warrick JH, Bhalla M, Schabel SI et al (1991) High resolution computed tomography in early scleroderma lung disease. The Journal of rheumatology 18(10):1520–1528

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Van Den Hoogen F, Khanna D, Fransen J et al (2013) 2013 Classification Criteria for Systemic Sclerosis: An American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism Collaborative Initiative: ACR/EULAR Classification Criteria for SSc. Arthritis & Rheumatism 65(11):2737–2747

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Orlandi I, Camiciottoli G, Diciotti S, Bartolucci M, Cavigli E et al (2006) Thinsection and low-dose volumetric computed tomographic densitometry of the lung in systemic sclerosis. J Comput Assist Tomogr 30:823–827

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Afeltra A, Zennaro D, Garzia P, Gigante A, Vadacca M et al (2006) Prevalence of interstitial lung involvement in patients with connective tissue diseases assessed with high-resolution computed tomography. Scand J Rheumatol 35:388–394

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Camiciottoli G, Orlandi I, Bartolucci M, Meoni E, Nacci F et al (2007) Lung CT densitometry in systemic sclerosis: correlation with lung function, exercise testing, and quality of life. Chest 131:672–681

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Yiannopoulos G, Pastromas V, Antonopoulos I, Katsiberis G, Kalliolias G et al (2007) Combination of intravenous pulses of cyclophosphamide and methylprednizolone in patients with systemic sclerosis and interstitial lung disease. Rheumatol Int 27:357–361

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Bellia M, Cannizzaro F, Scichilone N et al (2009) HRCT and scleroderma: semiquantitative evaluation of lung damage and functional abnormalities. La Radiologia Medica 114(2):190–203

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Savarino E, Bazzica M, Zentilin P, Pohl D, Parodi A et al (2009) Gastroesophageal reflux and pulmonary fibrosis in scleroderma: a study using pH-impedance monitoring. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 179:408–413

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Daoussis D, Liossis SN, Tsamandas AC, Kalogeropoulou C, Kazantzi A et al (2010) Experience with rituximab in scleroderma: results from a 1-year, proof of-principle study. Rheumatology (Oxford) 49:271–280

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Miller MR (2005) Standardisation of spirometry. European Respiratory Journal 26(2):319–338

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Asano Y (2018) Systemic sclerosis. The Journal of Dermatology 45(2):128–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Yilmaz N, Can M, Kocakaya D et al (2014) Two-year experience with mycophenolate mofetil in patients with scleroderma lung disease: a case series. International Journal of Rheumatic Diseases 17(8):923–928

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Takei R, Arita M, Kumagai S et al (2018) Radiographic fibrosis score predicts survival in systemic sclerosis-associated interstitial lung disease: Radiographic fibrosis in SSc-ILD. Respirology 23(4):385–391

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Ueda T, Sakagami T, Kikuchi T et al (2018) Mycophenolate mofetil as a therapeutic agent for interstitial lung diseases in systemic sclerosis. Respiratory Investigation 56(1):14–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Tardella M, Di Carlo M, Carotti M et al (2018) Ultrasound B-lines in the evaluation of interstitial lung disease in patients with systemic sclerosis: Cut-off point definition for the presence of significant pulmonary fibrosis. Medicine 97(18):e0566

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Wells AU (2014) Interstitial lung disease in systemic sclerosis. La Presse Médicale 43(10):e329–e343

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Zompatori M, Leone MB, Giannotta M et al (2013) Pulmonary hypertension and systemic sclerosis: the role of high-resolution computed tomography. La Radiologia Medica 118(8):1360–1372

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Hafez EA, Hamza SH, Morad CS et al (2018) Pulmonary manifestations in Egyptian patients with systemic sclerosis. The Egyptian Rheumatologist 40(1):39–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Shah RM, Jimenez S, Wechsler R (2007) Significance of ground-glass opacity on HRCT in long-term follow-up of patients with systemic sclerosis. Journal of Thoracic Imaging 22(2):120–124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. De Oliveira Jezler, S.F., Santiago, M.B., Andrade, T.L., et al (2005). Vol 31-Ed 4-page 300 to 306 (July August).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Pontana F, Billard AS, Duhamel A et al (2015) Effect of Iterative Reconstruction on the Detection of Systemic Sclerosis–related Interstitial Lung Disease: Clinical Experience in 55 Patients. Radiology 279(1):297–305

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Tillie-Leblond I, Wislez M, Valeyre D et al (2008) Interstitial lung disease and anti-Jo-1 antibodies: difference between acute and gradual onset. Thorax 63(1):53–59

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Burt RK, Oliveira MC, Shah SJ et al (2013) Cardiac involvement and treatment-related mortality after non-myeloablative haemopoietic stem-cell transplantation with unselected autologous peripheral blood for patients with systemic sclerosis: a retrospective analysis. The Lancet 381(9872):1116–1124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Ferguson EC, Berkowitz EA, Oldham SA (2008) CT imaging of thoracic scleroderma. Contemporary Diagnostic Radiology 31(16):1–5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Capobianco J, Grimberg A, Thompson BM et al (2012) Thoracic Manifestations of Collagen Vascular Diseases. Radio Graphics 32(1):33–50

    Google Scholar 

  31. Tumsatan P, Wongwiwatchai J, Apinives C et al (2016) Mediastinal lymphadenopathy in patients with systemic sclerosis. J. Med. Assoc. Thai 99(3):348–353

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Meune C, Vignaux O, Kahan A et al (2010) Heart involvement in systemic sclerosis: Evolving concept and diagnostic methodologies. Archives of Cardiovascular Diseases 103(1):46–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Leipsic J, Brown J, Pandey A et al (2013) Significance of various pulmonary and extrapulmonary abnormalities on HRCT of the chest in scleroderma lung. Indian Journal of Radiology and Imaging 23(4):304

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Ooi GC, Mok MY, Tsang KWT et al (2003) Interstitial lung disease in systemic sclerosis: An HRCT-clinical correlative study. Acta Radiologica 44(3):258–264

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank all the personnel contributed in this study.

Funding

This study had no funding from any resource.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

IH shared in study conception and design, collected patients' data, processed CT findings at CT work station, and shared in writing and correcting the manuscript and revision. SM shared in study conception and design, clinical examination, acquisition of data, analysis and interpretation of data, and drafting of manuscript. AS shared in collecting patients’ data, processing CT findings at CT work station, and shared in writing the manuscript. MK shared in study conception and design, acquisition of data, analysis and interpretation of data, and drafting of manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mostafa Ahmed Khairy.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

No individual data included in the study.

This study was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of the Faculty of Medicine at Cairo University Kasr El-Aini in Egypt in October 2017; reference number I-181017

All patients included in this study gave verbal informed consent to participate in this research.

Consent for publication

All patients included in this study gave written informed consent to publish the data contained within this study.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ibrahim, I.M.H., Gamal, S.M., Salama, A.M. et al. Systemic sclerosis: correlation between lung abnormalities on high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) and pulmonary function tests (PFTs). Egypt J Radiol Nucl Med 51, 98 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s43055-020-00220-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s43055-020-00220-3

Keywords