Concurrent use of oblique sagittal and oblique coronal MRI: does it enhance the specificity and the accuracy of diagnosing complete and partial ACL tears?

Hazem Hamed Soliman

doi:10.1186/s43055-020-0145-1

Research
Open Access
Published: 28 January 2020

Concurrent use of oblique sagittal and oblique coronal MRI: does it enhance the specificity and the accuracy of diagnosing complete and partial ACL tears?

Hazem Hamed Soliman ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-4855-4198¹

Egyptian Journal of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine volume 51, Article number: 22 (2020) Cite this article

319 Accesses
Metrics details

Abstract

Background

The aim of the study was to evaluate the diagnostic efficacy of utilization of oblique sagittal and oblique coronal MRI techniques separately and concurrently in improving the diagnosis of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) complete and partial tears. Between December 2017 and November 2018, 71 patients, with suspected ACL injury, were examined by MRI using four diagnostic approaches: standard routine images only (approach A), standard and oblique coronal images (approach B), standard and oblique sagittal images (approach C), and standard images with both oblique coronal and sagittal images (approach D). Two experienced musculoskeletal radiologists evaluated the MRI images separately and in a random order using the four methods, and findings were compared with arthroscopy results as a gold standard.

Results

The diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) for approach A in diagnosis of partial ACL tear was significantly lower than that for approaches B, C, and D (p value < 0.05). The PPV and NPV for approaches B (82% and 85%) and C (83% and 87%) in diagnosis of partial ACL tear which were significantly lower than that for approach D (94% and 95%). The four approaches revealed no significant difference in diagnosis of complete ACL tear (p value > 0.05). Approach D demonstrated highest interobserver agreement (94% in complete and 88% in partial ACL tears) in comparison to B (79% in complete and 66% in partial) and C (85% in complete and 71% in partial) when combining oblique sagittal and oblique coronal images in identifying both complete and partial ACL tears

Conclusion

The addition of oblique sagittal and coronal images improved diagnostic accuracy of detection of complete and partial ACL tears. The concurrent use of sagittal and coronal oblique images enhanced the diagnostic efficacy of diagnosis of partial ACL tears only.

Background

The anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tears constitute approximately half of all knee ligamentous injuries encountered in high impact or sporting activities [1]. Prompt diagnosis and management of ACL injuries prevent aggravation of cartilage degeneration and accelerated traumatic arthritis [2]. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of knee joints aids in the detection of the site and degree ACL injury [3]. However, arthroscopy remains the gold standard for assessment of internal derangement of the knee joint with the limitation of being an expensive and invasive procedure [4]. The ACL possesses a unique diagonal course extending from the inner surface of the lateral femoral condyle and attaching to a fossa in front and lateral to the anterior tibial spine [5]. Thus, the diagnostic potential of routine orthogonal MRI techniques for partial ACL injury is limited with fallible diagnosis [6]. To overcome this limitation, non-orthogonal MRI techniques such as coronal oblique and sagittal oblique techniques have been investigated for optimal visualization of ACL and better delineation of partial tears [7]. The aim of the study was to evaluate the diagnostic efficacy of utilization of oblique sagittal and oblique coronal MRI techniques separately and concurrently in improving the diagnosis of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) complete and partial tears.

Methods

Study population

From December 2017 to November 2018, 71 patients (28 females and 43 males) performing MRI examination of the knee joint were prospectively evaluated for knee injuries. The age ranged between 18 years and 62 years (mean age 35.5). The patients were referred from the orthopedic department, and the study was approved by the ethics committee of our institute.

Inclusion criteria

The inclusion criteria are as follows: patients with painful knee joint, joint instability, or history of trauma; positive anterior drawer test, occurs when there is increased anterior tibial translation; positive Lachman test, occurs when there is increased forward translation of the knee without a decisive “end-point”; and positive pivot shift test, occurs when the lateral tibial plateau begins anteriorly subluxed and returns to neutral as you flex the knee to around 30°.

Exclusion criteria

The exclusion criteria are as follows: history of previous ACL or meniscal repair, active intra-articular infection, metabolic or neoplastic bone disease, or absolute contraindications including the presence of intra-cardiac devices such as pacemaker or cardiac defibrillator, or the presence of conductive metallic devices. Cases that performed arthroscopy with an interval exceeding 1 month from the time of performing the MR examination were also excluded from this study.

Magnetic resonance imager

A Philips Gyroscan Intera 1.5 T scanner (Philips Medical Systems, Netherlands) was used with a dedicated knee coil.

Patient position

All patients were examined in a supine position with a slight external knee rotation. The patient was offered headphones to reduce the repetitive gradient noise.

Imaging parameters (Fig. 1)

The imaging protocol includes the following:

1.
Standard T2 WI: 4-mm slice thickness, 1-mm interval, TR/TE = 4000/95.
2.
Oblique coronal T2 WI: obtained from superimposing 2-mm-slice thickness cuts with 0.5-mm interval on the orthogonal sagittal T2 images, in a plane parallel to femoral intercondylar roof along the course of the ACL: TR/TE = 4000/95.
3.
Oblique sagittal T2 WI: obtained from superimposing 2-mm-slice thickness cuts with 0.5-mm interval on the oblique coronal T2 images, in a plane parallel to the medial border of the lateral femoral condyle: TR/TE = 4000/95.

Arthroscopy

It was performed by two orthopedic surgeons with 5 and 7 years of experience, respectively, for all patients included in the study within a period not exceeding 1 month from the time of performing the MR examination.

Image interpretation

The MRI images were interpreted by two experienced musculoskeletal radiologists with 8 and 10 years of experience, respectively, using four diagnostic approaches: standard images only (approach A), standard and oblique coronal images (approach B), standard and oblique sagittal images (approach C), and standard images with both oblique coronal and sagittal images (method D). Each radiologist evaluated the MRI images separately and in a random order using the four methods to avoid any recall bias.

A three-point grading system was deployed to assess the severity of ACL injury. Grade 0, intact ACL; grade 1, partial ligamentous tear; and grade 2, complete ligamentous tear. The ACL was considered intact if it presented low-signal intensity, well-preserved continuation, and taut orientation. Partial ACL tear was considered if there is a focal or diffuse intrasubstance increased signal intensity, direct visualization of partial fibril disruption, or focal thinning/swelling of the ACL with maintained continuity. A complete tear was considered if there is the lack of continuity, full thickness abnormal signal intensity, or an edematous mass totally replacing the ligament (Figs. 2, 3, 4, and 5).

Statistical analysis

Statistical Package for Social Sciences for Windows 15.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) was utilized to perform statistical analysis. The accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity for partial and complete ACL tears were compared to arthroscopic results, which were considered as a gold standard. A p value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Weighted kappa statistics were used to calculate interobserver agreement. The strength of agreement was interpreted according to the Landis and Koch guidelines as follows: 0, poor; 0.01–0.20, slight; 0.21–0.40, fair; 0.41–0.60, moderate; 0.61–0.80, substantial; and 0.81–1.00, almost perfect.

Results

Arthroscopic results revealed 46 patients with ACL tear, 25 complete and 21 partial tears. The accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of detection of complete ACL tears for each diagnostic approach are demonstrated in Table 1. The sensitivity for the use of each diagnostic approach in detection of complete ACL tear revealed no significant statistical difference (p value > 0.05). However, the specificity and accuracy for approach A was significantly lower than that for B, C, and D approaches (p value < 0.05). The accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity for approaches B, C, and D in detection of complete ACL tears showed no statistical significant difference amongst them.

Table 1 Summarized the diagnosis of complete ACL tear by each diagnostic approach. Approach A indicates standard sagittal images only; approach B, orthogonal sagittal and additional oblique sagittal images; approach C, orthogonal sagittal and oblique coronal images; and approach D, orthogonal sagittal, oblique sagittal, and oblique coronal images (p < 0.05)

Full size table

The accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity for diagnosis of partial ACL tears for each diagnostic approach are demonstrated in Table 2. The accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity for approach A in detection of partial ACL tear was significantly lower than that for approaches B, C, and D (p value < 0.05). The accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity and accuracy of approaches B and C for detection of partial ACL tears were significantly lower than that for approach D.

Table 2 Summarized the diagnosis of partial ACL tear by each approach. Approach A indicates orthogonal sagittal images only; approach B, orthogonal sagittal and additional oblique sagittal images; approach C, orthogonal sagittal and oblique coronal images; and approach D, orthogonal sagittal, oblique sagittal, and oblique coronal images (p < 0.05)

Full size table

The interobserver agreement for the diagnosis of complete ACL tear is summarized in Table 3, while the interobserver agreement for the diagnosis of partial ACL tear is summarized in Table 4. The study revealed that the interobserver agreement improved using approaches B and C in comparison to approach A. However, approach D demonstrated highest interobserver agreement in comparison to B and C when combining oblique sagittal and oblique coronal images in identifying both complete and partial ACL tears.

Table 3 Interobserver agreement for the diagnosis of complete ACL tear

Full size table

Table 4 Interobserver agreement for the diagnosis of partial ACL tear

Full size table

Discussion

The normal ACL anatomy can be readily delineated by orthogonal sagittal and coronal MRI images [8]. However, due to its oblique course, 5–10% of the normally imaged anterior cruciate ligaments are difficult to visualize by orthogonal sagittal MRI [9]. Additionally, artifacts from the popliteal artery, partial volume, osteoarthritis, and post traumatic fibrous scarring increase the false-positive diagnosis of an ACL tear [10].

Nowadays, identifying ACL partial tear is of utmost importance in the management of ACL tears as it improves the outcome of ACL reconstruction. However, the diagnosis of partial ACL tears is diagnostically challenging owing to the striated appearance of a normal ACL which is aggravated with the use of fluid-sensitive sequences mimicking the appearance of partial ACL [11, 12].

To overcome these anatomical and technical limitations, various techniques were utilized to allow delineation of the entire course of the ACL in a single slice through parallel imaging along the ACL longitudinal axis [13].

Several methods to obtain oblique sagittal images were described in literature; Buckwalter and Pennes acquired an imaging plane angled 15° to the standard sagittal plane [9], and Do-Dai et al sliced parallel to the medial border of the lateral femoral condyle to develop oblique sagittal images for the ACL [14]. Nakanishi et al. sliced on axial image at an angle of 10° [15]. In this study, we acquired the oblique sagittal image plane parallel to the inter-condylar surface of the lateral femoral condyle.

Oblique coronal images were also utilized in previous studies to evaluate for ACL injuries. Staeubli et al. stated that the best sequence to visualize the ACL diagonal course is achieved by oblique coronal images as it clearly delineates the relation of the ACL attachment to the inter-condylar notch as well as its orientation towards the posterior cruciate ligament [16]. Hong et al. also concluded that oblique coronal MRI sequences increased the diagnostic efficacy in differentiating between partial and complete ACL tears [17]. In this study, we acquired the oblique coronal image plane parallel to femoral inter-condylar roof along the course of the ACL.

In the present study, we investigated the accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of utilizing additional oblique sagittal and oblique coronal images with standard sagittal images both separately and in combination with the evaluation of complete and partial ACL tears.

This study showed that the addition of oblique sagittal and oblique coronal images to the standard sagittal images whether separately or in combination (approaches B, C, and D) improved the specificity and accuracy of the diagnosis of complete ACL tears in comparison to the standard sagittal images only (approach A). However, there was no statistical significance in diagnosis of complete ACL tear obtained from a combined use of oblique sagittal and coronal images (approach D) in comparison to the use of only one of the oblique images (approaches B and C. This was in agreement with the study performed by Kwon et al., which demonstrated that additional oblique imaging improved the specificity for diagnosing complete ACL tear. It also showed that either method of oblique imaging alone is sufficient with no statistical significance detected in combining both oblique methods [18].

As for diagnosis of partial ACL tears, this study revealed that the accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity for approach A in diagnosis of partial ACL tear was significantly lower than that for approaches B, C, and D (p value < 0.05). This was also in agreement with the findings described by Kwon et al. [18].

However, on the contrary to Kwon et al. [18] which stated that there was no statistical significance between the use of a single oblique method and their concurrent use in the diagnosis of ACL partial tears, this study revealed that the accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of concurrent utilization of oblique sagittal and coronal images (approach D) for detection of partial ACL tear were significantly higher than that for approaches B and C (p value < 0.05). This is likely attributed to the advantage of the concurrent use of both obliques in detection of the entire course and femoral attachment of the ACL on two different planes enhancing the accuracy of diagnosis of changes in ACL thickness, signal intensity, continuity, and contour.

In 2018, Ghasem et al. [19] showed that the addition of oblique sagittal to standard images was better than the addition of oblique coronal images in the detection of complete and partial ACL tears with PPV and NPV of 78% and 88% in partial and 83% and 100% in complete ACL tears. Our results showed that there was no statistical significance in using either sagittal oblique or coronal oblique separately in diagnosis of partial and complete ACL tears; however, our study revealed that there is a statistical significant difference in diagnosing partial ACL tears when both oblique methods were performed together instead of performing it separately. The PPV and NPV for (approach D) in partial ACL tears were 94% and 95% in comparison to 82% and 85% in (approach B) and 83% and 87% in (approach C).

Our study showed that there is a higher interobserver agreement in diagnosis of complete and partial ACL tears using approaches B, C, and D in comparison to approach A, being highest with approaches C and D. This is in agreement with Kosaka et al., which showed higher diagnostic performance and interobserver agreement when using additional oblique coronal images [20]. The main reason for this is that oblique coronal images clearly delineate the course and femoral attachment of the ACL.

The present study had some limitations: First, the inconsistency as regards the duration between the onset of symptoms or time of injury and the MRI examination. However, the time interval between MRI examination and arthroscopy was limited to 1 month. Secondly, the difference in slice thickness between the standard sagittal images (4-mm slice thickness) and oblique sagittal and coronal images (2-mm slice thickness) was not taken into consideration in our study when comparing the different imaging techniques.

Conclusion

The addition of oblique sagittal and coronal images improved diagnostic accuracy of detection of complete and partial ACL tears. The concurrent use of sagittal and coronal oblique images enhanced the accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of diagnosis of partial ACL tears only. Thus, we advise the use of concurrent sagittal and coronal oblique images in cases of partial ACL tear suspicion.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

ACL:: Anterior cruciate ligament
MRI:: Magnetic resonance imaging
PPV:: Positive predictive value
NPV:: Negative predictive value

References

1.
Park JS, Nam DC, Kim DH, Kim HK, Hwang SC (2012) Measurement of knee morphometrics using MRI: a comparative study between ACL-injured and non-injured knees. Knee Surg Related Res 24(3):180–185
Article Google Scholar
2.
AHN JH, JEONG, Hyo S, KANG HW (2016) Risk factors of false-negative magnetic resonance imaging diagnosis for meniscal tear associated with anterior cruciate ligament tear. Arthroscopy 32(6):1147–1154
Article Google Scholar
3.
Vassalou EE, Klontzas ME, Kouvidis GK, Matalliotaki PI, Karantanas AH (2016) Rotational knee laxity in anterior cruciate ligament deficiency: an additional secondary sign on MRI. AJR. Am J Roentgenol 206:151–154. https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.15.14816
Article Google Scholar
4.
Roßbach BP, Pietschmann MF, Gülecyüz MF, Niethammer TR, Ficklscherer A, Wild S, Jansson V, Müller PE (2014 Dec 22) Indications requiring preoperative magnetic resonance imaging before knee arthroscopy. Arch Med Sci. 10(6):1147–1152
Article Google Scholar
5.
Li K, Du J, Huang L-X, Ni L, Liu T, Yang H-L (2017) The diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging for anterior cruciate ligament injury in comparison to arthroscopy: a meta-analysis. Scientific Rep 7.1:7583
Article Google Scholar
6.
Khan HA, Ahad H, Sharma P, Bajaj P, Hassan N, Kamal Y (2015) Correlation between magnetic resonance imaging and arthroscopic findings in the knee joint. Trauma Mon 20(1):e18635
PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
7.
Volokhina YV, Syed HM, Pham PH, Blackburn AK (2015) Two helpful MRI signs for evaluation of posterolateral bundle tears of the anterior cruciate ligament: a pilot study. Orthop J Sports Med 3(8):2325967115597641
Article Google Scholar
8.
Mesgarzadeh M, Schneck CD, Bonakdarpour A (1988) Akbar. Magnetic resonance imaging of the knee and correlation with normal anatomy. Radiographics 8(4):707–733
CAS Article Google Scholar
9.
Buckwalter KA, Pennes DR (1990) Anterior cruciate ligament: oblique sagittal MRI imaging. Radiology 175:276–277
CAS Article Google Scholar
10.
Link TM, Steinbach LS, Ghosh S, Ries M, Lu Y, Lane N, Majumdar S (2003) Osteoarthritis: MRI imaging findings in different stages of disease and correlation with clinical findings. Radiology 226:373–381
Article Google Scholar
11.
Simpfendorfer C, Polster J (2014) MRI of the knee: what do we miss? Curr Radiol Rep 2(4):43
Article Google Scholar
12.
Borbon CA, Mouzopoulos G, Siebold R (2012) Why perform an ACL augmentation? Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 20:245–251
Article Google Scholar
13.
Fuss FK (1989) Anatomy of the cruciate ligaments and their function in extension and flexion of the human knee joint. Am J Anat 184:165–176
CAS Article Google Scholar
14.
Do-Dai DD, Stracener JC, Youngberg RA (1994) Oblique sagittal MRI of anterior cruciate ligament. J. Comput. Assist. Tomogr. 18:160–162
CAS Article Google Scholar
15.
Nakanishi K, Horibe S, Shiozaki Y, Ishida T, Narumi Y, Ikezoe J, Nakamura H (1997) MRI of normal anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) and recon-structed ACL: comparison of when the knee is extended with when the knee is flexed. Eur. Radiol 7:1020–1024
CAS Article Google Scholar
16.
Staeubli HU, Adam O, Becker W, Burgkart R (1999) Anterior cruciate ligament and intercondylar notch in the coronal oblique plane: anatomy complemented by magnetic resonance imaging in cruciate ligament-intact knees. Arthroscopy 15:349–359
CAS Article Google Scholar
17.
Hong SH, Choi JY, Lee GK, Choi JA, Chong HW, Kang HS (2003) Grading of anterior cruciate ligament injury. Diagnostic efficacy of oblique coronal magnetic resonance imaging of the knee. J Comput Assist Tomogr 27:814–819
Article Google Scholar
18.
Kwon JW, Yoon YC, Kim YN, Ahn JH, Choe BK (2009) Which oblique plane is more helpful in diagnosing an anterior cruciate ligament tear? Clinical Radiology. March 64:291–297
CAS Google Scholar
19.
Hanafi MG, Gharibvand MM, Gharibvand RJ, Sadoni H (2018) Diagnostic value of oblique coronal and oblique sagittal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in diagnosis of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tears. J Med Life 11(4):281–285
Google Scholar
20.
Kosaka M, Nakase J, Toratani T, Ohashi Y, Kitaoka K, Yamada H, Komura K, Nakamura S, Tsuchiya H (2014) Oblique coronal and oblique sagittal MRI for diagnosis of anterior cruciate ligament tears and evaluation of anterior cruciate ligament remnant tissue. The Knee 21:54–57
Article Google Scholar

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable

Funding

The study has no funding from any resources.

Author information

Affiliations

Diagnostic and Intervention Radiology Department, Cairo University Hospitals, El-Manial, Cairo, 11956, Egypt
Hazem Hamed Soliman

Authors

Hazem Hamed Soliman
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Hazem Hamed Soliman (HHS) designed the research, performed the research, analyzed data, and wrote the paper. The author read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hazem Hamed Soliman.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was approved by the research ethic committee of the Radiology Department of the Faculty of Medicine at Cairo University on March 04, 2017, reference number of approval 653-2017. All patients included in this study gave written informed consent to participate in this research.

Consent for publication

All patients included in this research gave written informed consent to publish the data contained within this study.

Competing interests

The author declares that he has no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Soliman, H.H. Concurrent use of oblique sagittal and oblique coronal MRI: does it enhance the specificity and the accuracy of diagnosing complete and partial ACL tears?. Egypt J Radiol Nucl Med 51, 22 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s43055-020-0145-1

Download citation

Received: 16 September 2019
Accepted: 21 January 2020
Published: 28 January 2020
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s43055-020-0145-1

Keywords

Oblique
Coronal
Sagittal
Anterior cruciate ligament
Magnetic resonance