Hemiuterus with functional non-communicating horn in a young female
Egyptian Journal of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine volume 52, Article number: 127 (2021)
Mullerian duct anomalies are a broad spectrum of congenital anomalies of the female genital tract presenting with variable symptoms like infertility, amenorrhoea, dysmenorrhea, pelvic endometriosis, and poor obstetric outcomes. Unicornuate uterus or hemiuterus occurs as a result of abnormal formation or failure of formation of the contralateral part.
We present a rare case report of hemiuterus with functional non-communicating horn along with hematometra in a 15-year-old female who presented with severe dysmenorrhoea since her menarche. Pelvic Ultrasonography demonstrated inconclusive findings of a heterogenous lesion in the right pelvic cavity adjacent to the uterus. Further, pelvic MRI revealed a hemiuterus on the left side with a normal endometrial cavity and a well-defined functional non-communicating horn on right side. The diagnosis of European Society of Human Reproduction (ESHRE) Classification U4a uterine anomaly (left hemiuterus with functional non-communicating horn on right side) was established.
ESHRE Class U4a comprises of hemiuterus with a functional rudimentary horn. This is considered clinically significant as it may lead to further complications, such as hematometra or ectopic pregnancy in the rudimentary horn. Hence, the correct identification of this entity is essential as laparoscopic removal is the current recommended management.
Mullerian duct anomalies (MDA) belong to a broad spectrum of congenital anomalies of uterus and vagina which occur due to developmental defects in the Mullerian ducts . These anomalies can present with various symptoms like infertility, amenorrhoea, dysmenorrhoea, pelvic endometriosis, and associated obstetric complications . Hysterosalpingography (HSG) is initially used to diagnose structural anomalies of the female genital tract . However, HSG lacks in the capability of characterizing the external morphology of the uterus and classifying the subtype of the anomaly. With the advent of newer modalities, HSG has been supplanted by pelvic ultrasonography (USG) and pelvic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Pelvic MRI is considered superior to pelvic ultrasonography for the diagnosis and classification of Mullerian duct anomalies as it provides excellent soft tissue depiction owing to its multiplanar capabilities [4, 5].
We present a rare case report of left hemiuterus with functional non-communicating horn on right side along with hematometra.
A 15-year-old female presented with severe dysmenorrhea since her menarche. She attained menarche at the age of 13 years with regular menstrual cycles of 22–25 days in duration. The pain was mildly alleviated by analgesics. On general examination, her blood pressure was 120/80 mmHg with heart rate of 78 beats/min. Her secondary sexual characters were well developed. Ultrasound of the pelvis was done which revealed a heterogenous, hypoechoic lesion adjacent to the uterus on the right side. The above findings on ultrasound were inconclusive.
Pelvis MRI with axial T1, T2, T1 FS (3 mm thickness), sagittal T2 (4 mm thickness), axial gradient echo (4 mm thickness) sequences were performed. Pelvic MRI (Fig. 1a–c) revealed a hemiuterus measuring 5.8 × 2.8 × 3 cm in size with a normal endometrial cavity. A well-defined structure measuring 4.5 × 4.2 cm was noted in contact with the hemiuterus on right side and showed endometrial cavity within. The endometrial cavity demonstrated loculated T1 hyperintense content within, suggestive of hematometra. No obvious communication was noted with the hemiuterus. Single cervical cavity was seen (Fig. 2a). No vaginal septum was seen (Fig. 2b). Bilateral ovaries and adnexa showed normal morphology. The diagnosis of ESHRE Classification U4a C0 V0 uterine anomaly (left hemiuterus with functional non-communicating horn on right side) was established (Fig. 2c). No associated renal anomalies were present.
The prevalence of Mullerian duct anomalies (MDA) ranges from 1 to 5% [6,7,8,9]. However, in women presenting with recurrent pregnancy loss, the prevalence is significantly higher (up to 15%) . Hence, the correct identification and classification of Mullerian duct anomalies is clinically significant. The importance of a universalized and comprehensive classification for congenital anomalies of the female genital tract cannot be understated .
The European Society of Human Reproduction (ESHRE)/European Society of Gynecological Endoscopy (ESGE) consensus  classifies congenital anomalies of the female genital tract categories on the basis of anatomical variations as follows:
Class U0 incorporates normal uterus. Class U1 comprises dysmorphic uterus. Separate uterus is considered as Class U2. All fusion defects are classified under U3 or Bi-corporeal uterus. Unilaterally formed uterus or hemiuterus is included under Class U4. Aplastic uterus is considered as Class U5. A separate class, U6 is reserved for still classified cases .
Class U4 is further subdivided into classes U4a and U4b depending on the morphological characteristics of the contralateral poorly formed part. If the rudimentary horn/cavity is functional, it is classified as Class U4a irrespective of it being communicating or non-communicating. Non-functional rudimentary horn/cavity is categorized as Class U4b .
ESHRE Class U4a (hemiuterus with a functional rudimentary horn/cavity) is associated with obstetric and gynecological complications such as hematometra and ectopic pregnancy [11,12,13,14]. Due to this reason, laparoscopic removal of Class U4a rudimentary horn is the current recommended line of management .
Mullerian duct anomalies incorporate wide spectrum of congenital anomalies of the female genital tract. Imaging plays crucial role in the diagnosis and classification of the Mullerian duct anomalies. Class U4a MDA represents a hemiuterus with a functional rudimentary horn/cavity and has been associated with complications such as haematometra and ectopic pregnancy. Hence, the correct identification of this rare entity is essential to improve the morbidity and prevent further obstetric and/or gynecological complications.
Availability of data and materials
The data and materials supporting the findings of this study are available on request from the corresponding author.
Mullerian duct anomalies
European Society of Human Reproduction
European Society of Gynaecological Endoscopy
Magnetic resonance imaging
Chandler TM, Machan LS, Cooperberg PL, Harris AC, Chang SD (2009) Mullerian duct anomalies: from diagnosis to intervention. Br J Radiol 82(984):1034–1042. https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr/99354802
Kachhawa G, Kriplani A (2017) Management of reproductive tract anomalies. J Obstet Gynaecol India 67(3):162–167
Simpson WL Jr, Beitia LG, Mester J (2006) Hysterosalpingography: a reemerging study. RadioGraphics. 26(2):419–431. https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.262055109
Maciel C, Bharwani N, Kubik-Huch RA, Manganaro L, Otero-Garcia M, Nougaret S, Alt CD, Cunha TM, Forstner R (2020) MRI of female genital tract congenital anomalies: European Society of Urogenital Radiology (ESUR) guidelines. Eur Radiol 30(8):4272–4283. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-020-06750-8
Saleem SN (2003) MR imaging diagnosis of uterovaginal anomalies: current state of the art. RadioGraphics 23(5):e13. https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.e13
Behr SC, Courtier JL, Qayyum A (2012) Imaging of Müllerian duct anomalies. RadioGraphics 32:E233–E250 October Special Issue 2012
Chan YY, Jayaprakasan K, Zamora J, Thornton JG, Raine-Fenning N, Coomarasamy A (2011) The prevalence of congenital uterine anomalies in unselected and high-risk populations: a systematic review. Hum Reprod Update 17(6):761
Grimbizis GF, Camus M, Tarlatzis BC, Bontis JN, Devroey P (2001) Clinical implications of uterine malformations and hysteroscopic treatment results. Hum Reprod Update 7(2):161
Acién P (1997) Incidence of Müllerian defects in fertile and infertile women. Hum Reprod 12(7):1372
Di Spiezio Sardo A, Campo R, Gordts S, Spinelli M, Cosimato C, Tanos V, Brucker S, Li TC, Gergolet M, De Angelis C, Gianaroli L, Grimbizis G (2015) The comprehensiveness of the ESHRE/ESGE classification of female genital tract congenital anomalies: a systematic review of cases not classified by the AFS system. Hum Reprod 30(5):1046
Grimbizis GF, Gordts S, Di Spiezio Sardo A, Brucker S, De Angelis C, Gergolet M, Li T-C, Tanos V, Brölmann H, Gianaroli L, Campo R (2013) The ESHRE/ESGE consensus on the classification of female genital tract congenital anomalies. Hum Reprod 28(8):2032
Kumari S, Gupta P, Jyoti PS (2019) A rare case of pregnancy in the rudimentary horn of unicornuate uterus (on table diagnosis): a case report. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol 8(3):1190
Johansen JK (1969) Pregnancy in a rudimentary horn. Two case reports. Obstet Gynecol 34(6):805–808
Kamal S, Roy P (2017) A study of complications in case of unicornuate uterus with rudimentary horn. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol 6(6):2607
Fedele L, Fedele BS, Fedele ZG, Fedele BN, Fedele BV, Fedele (2005) Laparoscopic removal of the cavitated noncommunicating rudimentary uterine horn: surgical aspects in 10 cases. Fertil Steril 83(2):432–436
Ethics approval and consent to participate
This study was approved from ethical committee of the institution. Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication of this case report and accompanying images.
Consent for publication
All authors read and approved the final manuscript. Patient included in this research gave written informed consent to publish the data and materials contained within this study.
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Venkatesh, M., Awal, S.S. Hemiuterus with functional non-communicating horn in a young female. Egypt J Radiol Nucl Med 52, 127 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s43055-021-00507-z
- Mullerian duct anomalies
- Rudimentary horn
- Case report