Frontal encephaloceles are a rare entity [2]. A retrospective study on neural tube defects was done by Ghosh Soumyodhriti et al. According to this study, the incidence of encephalocele was 14%, however, they did not discussed about the defects in the frontal bone in their study. The probable reason for this was the absence of cases in their study [5]. The basic etiology of encephalocele is the defect in the ectodermal layer which happens in utero. The cells of ectodermal layer which form the skull do not cover over the brain parenchyma. This effect causes outward protrusion of brain parenchyma and meninges through these osseous defects. Encephalocele may be present anywhere in head but most commonly located in midline location in the region of occiput [6]. The etiology is multifactorial. Few studies reveal that folic acid supplementation dramatically reduces the occurrence of these neural tube defects. Its use is advised at least 4 weeks before conception and is further continued till the 13 week of pregnancy [7].
Clinical presentations in these patients are very variable. Most of them presented with soft tissue swelling in the head. Most of the frontoethmoidal encephaloceles clinically presented with lump at the level of nasal bridge. Few of the patients may have facial dysmorphism such as proptosis and hypertelorism. Basal encephalocele is usually present with swelling in the region of nasopharynx and clinical symptoms of airway obstruction, nasal bleeding and CSF rhinorrhoea. These patients can also present epilepsy, delayed milestones, visual disturbances, gait abnormalities, microcephaly, paraplegia and intracranial hypertension [8,9,10].
As far as reporting format of encephalocele is concerned, familiarity with the anatomy is very important. The classification of encephaloceles based on their anatomical location (especially the anterior ones) has been well described in the studies. The encephaloceles in the nasofrontal region occur due to abnormal regression of the dural diverticulum from the prenasal space [9, 11]. Magnetic resonance imaging helps in characterizing the anatomical site of the encephalocele, characterize the contents of the sac and also identify any other associated congenital malformations of the central nervous system. These imaging features further help in pre-surgical planning and prognosis of the disease. Computed tomography scanning can also show the osseous anatomy very well with special use of volume rendering technique (VRT) to see the three-dimensional view of the osseous defects. Routine MRI sequences include TSE T1W and TSE T2W sequences in axial, coronal and sagittal planes. Magnetic resonance venography and angiography may also be required to determine the relation of encephaloceles and their contents with cerebral venous sinuses and arteries. This is done to avoid any intraoperative vascular injury and to prevent any ischemic event post-operatively. Heavily weighted T2-weighted or CISS images should be done while evaluating the pathologies in the fronto-ethmoidal region, to delineate the tracts and various intracranial connections. These sequences can also help to differentiate nasal glioma, dorsal dermal sinus and encephalocele.
CT scan is highly useful in accurately assessing the dimensions of the skull vault defects, so that appropriate surgical planning can be done. As far as location is concerned, the anterior encephaloceles are located anterior to the bregma. They are subdivided into sincipital variety and basal variety depending upon their location in the region of the nasal bridge and the cribriform plate and sphenoid sinus, respectively [9, 10]. Sincipital encephaloceles are further subdivided into two main types: frontoethmoidal and interfrontal.
Interfrontal variety is seen between bregma and the nasal bone and is often midline in location adjacent to the caudal aspect of the metopic suture. The frontoethmoidal variety occurs through the foramen cecum, that is located anterior to the crista galli. The frontoethmoidal encephaloceles are subcategorized into nasofrontal, nasoethmoidal and nasoorbital types [12].
Confirmative radiological diagnosis of frontal encephalocele is made with the help of CT and MRI of the brain, as both these imaging modalities have different roles. Associated craniofacial anomalies can also be visualized by combining these modalities.
As far as gray matter heterotopia is concerned, it is defined as a neuronal migration disorder in which the cortical neurons are present in an abnormal anatomical location. There is arrest in the radial migration of neurons from the germinal matrix within the wall of the ventricle to the developing cerebral cortex in the intrauterine life. This usually occurs between six to sixteen of intrauterine life. The disease is usually discovered during imaging evaluation of children with neurodevelopmental abnormalities, seizures or it can be incidental.
The exact etiopathogenesis of heterotopia is not well understood, but these pathologies can present with typical clinic-radiological syndromes. Types of heterotopia include nodular, laminar and leptomeningeal, (double cortex or band heterotopia) varieties, however, the classification has no significant clinical impact [13].
Neurophysicians have classified heterotopia into subependymal, subcortical and band varieties based on findings on magnetic resonance imaging findings. The three patterns were classified on the basis of the site and appearance of the ectopic gray matter. The subependymal variety has small foci of gray matter situated along the subependymal lining in close relation with the walls of the ventricles. Subcortical heterotopia is seen within subcortical and deep white matter. Band heterotopia was described as a symmetrical thick band of gray matter tissue with smooth margins that is seen with in the layers of the white matter [13, 14].
On MRI, the subependymal heterotopias appear as round to ovoid subependymal nodules, located just beneath and abutting the ependymal lining of the lateral ventricles. They may protrude slightly into the ventricular lumen causing irregular ventricular outline. The number and size of nodules may vary from small size to a sheet-like layer of conglomerate nodules of gray matter. Important point is that these nodules do not enhance after intravenous administration of gadolinium. This point distinguishes them from the subependymal nodules of tuberous sclerosis, as these nodules are not isointense to gray matter and they enhance after intravenous gadolinium administration.
Cortical heterotopias appear on MRI as areas of ectopic gray matter within the cerebral white matter. The size varies from a few centimeters to large focal mass-like lesions that may cause distortion of the adjacent ventricle. These also do not show enhancement on post-contrast sequences.
Band heterotopias appear as smooth, bilateral and symmetric ribbon type areas of ectopic gray matter in the central white matter between the cerebral cortex and the ventricular surface. These areas are separated from the cortex by normally myelinated cerebral white matter. Bands are not in continuation with the overlying cortex. They do not contain blood vessels or cerebrospinal fluid. The thicker the band; the worse is the clinical disability and also higher prevalence of developmental delay [14]. Only a few cases of frontonasal encephalocele with subependymal nodular heterotopias has been described in the literature [15]. Few cases are there in the literature that demonstrates the association of anterior encephalocele with subependymal nodular heterotopia, cortical dysplasia and epilepsy [16]. Roelens et al. evaluated the presence of nodular subependymal heterotopia in two case series with posterior encephalocele [17]. Lotfi presented the first case of periventricular heterotopia associated with cervical meningocele. Our case report further emphasizes the role of MRI brain in the evaluation of these congenital neural tube defects [18]. Various pediatric cerebellar malformations have been described in the literature which include cerebellar hypoplasia, aplasia, dysplasia and dandy walker malformations. Most of these patients are present with global develeopmental delay [19]. To the best of our knowledge, no association of unilateral cerebellar hypoplasia and dysplasia with anterior encephalocle and heterotopias has been described in the literature. We describe an unusual rare case of 18-months-old boy with a frontonasal soft tissue swelling with radiological evaluation showing frontonasal encephalocele, subependymal nodular heterotopias and left cerebellar atrophy with dysplasia. The limitation of the case report was that patient did not come for follow-up.
