Skip to main content

Assessment of the relationship between hepatocellular carcinoma location and its response to transarterial chemoembolization

Abstract

Background

Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) is the recommended treatment in intermediate stage of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Many indices are used to predict the outcome of the TACE. The location of the HCC has not been enough studied as a prognostic variable.

Results

We evaluated 149 HCC nodules (111 patients) and analyzed the association between the response to TACE and the nodule location. There was a significant difference between the complete response (CR) and the non-CR group in the location of the HCC regarding its segment and the response to TACE with the anterior segment lesions achieving higher rates of complete response (CR) (P .03), and the distance between the tumor and the liver capsule with the subcapsular lesions showing higher rate of non-CR (P .02). However, there was no significant difference between the CR and the non-CR groups regarding the location between the right and the left lobes (P .48) and the central versus peripheral lesions (P .41).

Conclusions

The location of the HCC can improve the prediction of the tumor response to TACE. Anterior segment tumors showed a higher rate of complete response and subcapsular lesions showed a higher rate of recurrence after TACE.

Background

Primary liver cancer is the sixth most common malignancy worldwide. Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) represents 75–85% of those cases [1]. Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) is recommended in management of stage B patients of Barcelona Clinic liver Cancer (BCLC) staging system. TACE combines delivering chemotherapeutic agents to the tumor as well as arterial embolization to induce tumor necrosis [2].

Liver cirrhosis induces morphometric and perfusion alterations in the liver parenchyma. These changes are more prominent in Child–Pugh Class A patients and decrease with the progression of the disease [3].

A study on hepatitis C-related cirrhotic patients demonstrated anterior and middle segments atrophy with lateral and posterior segments and caudate lobe hypertrophy. This was attributed to higher venous pressure in the middle hepatic vein drainage area due to compression caused by cirrhotic nodules [4]. Also, a study showed that in case of portal vein obstruction there is a decrease in peripheral zone perfusion with atrophic changes, whereas the central zone acquires more blood flow causing its hypertrophy [5].

The purpose of this study was to assess the relationship between the location of the HCC and its response to TACE.

Methods

Patients

Retrospective analysis of patients who underwent TACE in our institution between January 2019 and December 2020 was performed. Inclusion criteria were as follows: (1) diagnosis of HCC by CT, MRI or histopathology, (2) BCLC stage B patients, (3) patients who had naïve lesions, (4) patients who underwent conventional TACE and (5) technical success of TACE. Exclusion criteria were as follows: (1) recurrent HCC, (2) nodules who underwent additional ablation with TACE and (3) the presence of vascular invasion. Our study included 149 nodules (111 patients).

TACE procedure

Puncture of the right common femoral artery and inserting 6F vascular sheath was performed. A 5F Cobra head catheter is introduced over 0.035″ hydrophilic guidewire, or coaxial microcatheter if necessary, and celiac-mesenteric angiography is done to confirm feeding arteries to HCC and assess liver anatomy. Selective catheterization was done as distal as possible to minimize collateral liver injury but proximal enough to treat the entire targeted lesion. Delivery of chemotherapy doxorubicin 50 mg/m2 (up to 100 mg) emulsified in Lipiodol under continuous fluoroscopic visualization followed by gelfoam embolization.

HCC location

The location of the HCC was determined according to right and left lobes and anterior, posterior, lateral and medial segments and according to the Couinaud classification. Also, the location being central versus peripheral was defined by the coefficient of the HCC, which is the ratio of the distance from the hilum of the liver at the portal vein bifurcation to the center of the HCC (A) divided by the diameter of the whole liver on the same line (B) (Fig. 1.). Higher coefficient means more peripheral location, and lower coefficient means more central location.

Fig. 1
figure 1

The coefficient of the HCC = distance from the hilum of the liver at the portal vein bifurcation to the center of the HCC (A) divided by the diameter of the whole liver on the same line (B)

Evaluation of treatment response

Contrast-enhanced CT or MRI (1 month after TACE) was used for follow-up and mRECIST criteria were used to assess tumor response [6] (Table 1).

Table 1 mRECIST criteria

Statistical analysis

The Mann–Whitney U test, Kruskal–Wallis test and Chi-square test were used to assess the association between response to TACE and different variables. All analyses were performed using SPSS software version 26.0. A P value of < 0.05 was considered significant.

Results

TACE procedures were done on 149 nodules (111 patients). The baseline characteristics are summarized in Table 2.

Table 2 Baseline characteristics

The response to TACE was classified to complete response (CR) group (Fig. 2) and non-CR group (Fig. 3) including partial response (PR), stable disease (SD) and progressive disease (PD). Results are summarized in Table 3 and the response in each lobe and segment is summarized in Table 4.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Complete response: A CT image showing complete Lipiodol deposition with no areas of tumoral arterial enhancement. B MR image showing no intratumoral enhancement

Fig. 3
figure 3

Non-complete response: A CT (red arrow) and B MR image showing intratumoral arterial enhancement after TACE

Table 3 Response to TACE in all lesions
Table 4 Response to TACE classified by lobes and segments

The relationship between the HCC location and the tumor response

There was a statistically significant difference between the CR and the non-CR groups regarding the segmental location of the HCC with anterior segment showing higher rates of complete response (P 0.03) (Fig. 4). However, there was no statistically significant difference between the CR and the non-CR groups regarding the location between the right and the left lobes (P 0.48) (Fig. 5).

Fig. 4
figure 4

Bar chart showing the association between the segment of the tumor and CR and non-CR groups, significant difference (P .03)

Fig. 5
figure 5

Bar chart showing the association between the lobe of the tumor and CR and non-CR groups, no significant difference (P .48)

As regards the central versus peripheral location of the tumor, there was no statistically significant difference in the median of the location coefficient between the CR and the non-CR groups compared between all segments (P 0.41) (Fig. 6). However, there was a statistically significant difference between the CR and the non-CR groups regarding the distance of the tumor from the capsule of the liver (P 0.02), with the non-CR group showing shorter distance from the capsule compared to the CR group (Fig. 7).

Fig. 6
figure 6

Box plots of the relationship between central vs peripheral lesions and the CR and non-CR groups, no significant difference (P .62)

Fig. 7
figure 7

Box plots of the relationship between the distance from the capsule to the lesion and the CR and non-CR groups, significant difference (P .02)

Discussion

TACE is the recommended treatment in intermediate stage of HCC [7]. Different prognostic variables are used to predict the efficacy of TACE in different patients including tumor size, portal vein invasion, alpha-fetoprotein level, Child–Pugh grade and performance status [8].

TACE induces vascular endothelial growth factor, which promotes angiogenesis and can cause recurrence in the HCC [9]. Cirrhotic liver has parenchymal and perfusional changes that can alter the response to TACE in different liver regions [5]. Areas with atrophy and decreased perfusion can promote better response to TACE. In this retrospective study, we analyzed the relationship between the location of the HCC and its response to TACE to assess whether it can be included as a prognostic factor.

A novel finding in our study was the presence of a significant correlation between the segment of the tumor and its response to TACE. The tumors of the anterior segment showed higher complete response rates. A study reported atrophy of the middle hepatic venous drainage area with atrophy of the anterior segment of the liver [4]. In cirrhotic patients, regenerative nodule compresses the hepatic veins and the middle hepatic vein is the most affected one due to its smaller caliber and longer course compared to the other hepatic veins [4].

Several studies showed that peripheral area of the liver had less vascularity compared to the central areas, which should promote better efficacy of TACE in peripheral areas. A retrospective study indicated better response for TACE in the peripheral zone of the right lobe and the medial segment in Child–Pugh grade A patients [10]. However, in our study there was no significant difference between central versus peripheral tumors.

We observed a significant correlation regarding the distance between the tumor and the liver capsule and the efficacy of TACE with non-complete response occurring more frequently in the subcapsular region. Peripherally located and exophytic lesions have higher frequency of having extrahepatic collateral vessels; this can affect the efficacy of TACE [11]. It is suspected when there is a defect in Lipidol retention during the TACE procedure or there is recurrence in the follow-up imaging. Interventional radiologist should be familiar with the possible extrahepatic collateral supply and if possible chemoembolization of those vessels should be done [11].

Our study had several limitations. First, our sample included only HCC with viral etiology. Comparative studies with different etiologies are also necessary. Second, very few lesions were present in the caudate lobe in our study for better assessment of the response to TACE in all the segments.

Conclusions

The location of the HCC can improve the prediction of the tumor response to TACE. Anterior segment tumors showed higher rates of complete response, and subcapsular lesions showed a higher rate of recurrence after TACE.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

TACE:

Transarterial chemoembolization

HCC:

Hepatocellular carcinoma

CR:

Complete response

BCLC:

Barcelona Clinic liver Cancer

References

  1. Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL et al (2021) Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin 71(3):209–249. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21660

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. She WH, Cheung TT (2016) Bridging and downstaging therapy in patients suffering from hepatocellular carcinoma waiting on the list of liver transplantation. Transl Gastroenterol Hepatol 1:34. https://doi.org/10.21037/tgh.2016.03.04

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Ozaki K, Matsui O, Kobayashi S, Minami T, Kitao A, Gabata T (2016) Morphometric changes in liver cirrhosis: aetiological differences correlated with progression. Br J Radiol 89(1059):20150896. https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20150896

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Ozaki K, Matsui O, Kobayashi S et al (2010) Selective atrophy of the middle hepatic venous drainage area in hepatitis C-related cirrhotic liver: morphometric study by using multidetector CT. Radiology 257(3):705–714. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.10100468

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Jang H-J, Khalili K, Yu H, Kim TK (2012) Perfusion and parenchymal changes related to vascular alterations of the liver. Abdom Imaging 37(3):404–421. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-011-9767-0

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Lencioni R, Llovet JM (2010) Modified RECIST (mRECIST) assessment for hepatocellular carcinoma. Semin Liver Dis 30(1):52–60. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0030-1247132

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. EASL Clinical Practice Guidelines (2018) Management of hepatocellular carcinoma. J Hepatol 69(1):182–236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhep.2018.03.019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Lladó L, Virgili J, Figueras J et al (2000) A prognostic index of the survival of patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma after transcatheter arterial chemoembolization. Cancer 88(1):50–57. https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1097-0142(20000101)88:1%3c50::aid-cncr8%3e3.0.co;2-i

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Chan SL, Mok T, Ma BBY (2012) Management of hepatocellular carcinoma: beyond sorafenib. Curr Oncol Rep 14(3):257–266. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11912-012-0233-0

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Miki I, Murata S, Uchiyama F et al (2017) Evaluation of the relationship between hepatocellular carcinoma location and transarterial chemoembolization efficacy. World J Gastroenterol 23(35):6437–6447. https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v23.i35.6437

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Kim H-C, Chung JW, Lee W, Jae HJ, Park JH. Recognizing Extrahepatic Collateral Vessels That Supply Hepatocellular Carcinoma to Avoid Complications of Transcatheter Arterial Chemoembolization. RadioGraphics. 2005;25(suppl_1):S25-S39. doi:https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.25si055508

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable

Funding

No funding.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

AE made the concept, design of the work, analysis and interpretation of the data. SMA has made analysis and interpretation of the data. HMN has drafted the work and substantively revised it. MSH made acquisition, analysis and interpretation of the data and substantively revised it. All authors have read and approved the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ahmed Elsahhar.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of the Faculty of Medicine at Ain Shams University in Egypt. The Committee’s reference number is not applicable. Written informed consent was signed by all patients before the procedure.

Consent for publication

Consent for publication was obtained for every individual person’s data included in the study.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Elsahhar, A., Abdelwahab, S.M., Nasser, H.M. et al. Assessment of the relationship between hepatocellular carcinoma location and its response to transarterial chemoembolization. Egypt J Radiol Nucl Med 52, 220 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s43055-021-00601-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s43055-021-00601-2

Keywords