- Research
- Open access
- Published:
Greater trochanteric pain syndrome: a simplified MRI approach
Egyptian Journal of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine volumeĀ 53, ArticleĀ number:Ā 82 (2022)
Abstract
Background
Greater trochanteric pain syndrome (GTPS) refers to pain and tenderness over the greater trochanter. It is a common entity of lateral hip pain that is usually related to the overuse or small injuries of the gluteus medius or minimus tendons and their surrounding bursae. MRI is the favored modality for evaluation of the hip region disorders. Treatment options ranges from conservative to surgical treatment.
Results
Trochanteric (sub-gluteal maximus) bursal fluid was the most common finding found in 55 hips (73%), followed by gluteal tendinosis (64%) and partial thickness gluteal tendon tear (29%). Full thickness tear of the gluteal tendons occurred in 10 hips (13%). The relation between gluteal tendinosis and greater trochanteric bursal fluid was statistically significant (Pā<ā0.05) with sensitivity and specificity of 85% and 78% respectively.
Conclusion
MRI should be utilized in a simple systemized approach by MSK radiologist in order not to miss a finding that may influence the surgical outcome of the patient presenting with GTPS.
Background
Greater trochanteric pain syndrome (GTPS) refers to pain and tenderness over the greater trochanter. It is a common entity of lateral hip pain that is usually related to the overuse or small injuries of the gluteus medius or minimus tendons and their surrounding bursae [1]. It is more common in obese females over the age of 40Ā years [2]. The greater trochanter offers insertion for the gluteus minimus and medius muscles associated with surrounding three bursae in-between [3,4,5].
MRI is the favored modality for evaluation of the hip region disorders. Treatment options ranges from conservative as analgesic, physical therapy and local anaesthetic injection to surgical treatment in recurrent and persistent symptoms [6, 7].
This study aims to evaluate the role of MRI in assessment of the pathological changes at the greater trochanter structures responsible for the clinical symptoms of the GTPS.
Methods
MRI (1.5Ā T Philips Achieva Gyroscan, Best, Netherlands) was performed on 65 patients with clinical diagnosis of lateral hip pain suspected to have greater trochanteric pain syndrome (GTPS) between Jan 2020 and Jan 2021. All the examinations included: standard MRI sequences; TSE: axial T1 (TR/TE 500/20Ā ms, flip angle 90Ā°, acquisition voxel: 1.3āĆā1.3Ā mm, slice thickness 4Ā mm), coronal T2 (TR/TE 4500/100Ā ms, flip angle 90Ā°, acquisition voxel: 1.3āĆā1.3Ā mm, slice thickness 4Ā mm) and Proton density fat suppression (PDFS) in the axial, coronal and sagittal planes (TR/TE 3500/35Ā ms, flip angle 90Ā°, acquisition voxel: 1.3āĆā1.3Ā mm, slice thickness 4Ā mm). Field of view (FOV): 320ā360Ā mm, Number of acquisitions (NEX): 2, Band width (BW): 150 and echo-train length (ETL): 6.
MRI sequences was assessed for the following findings:
-
Gluteal tendinosis: increased tendon thickness and interstitial edema with preserved continuity.
-
Partial thickness tear of the gluteal medius or minimus tendons: partial loss of tendon continuity.
-
Full thickness tear of the gluteal tendons: retracted tendon ends with or without fluid gap.
-
Bursal fluid within the trochanteric bursa: fluid is lying superficial to gluteal medius tendon.
-
Bursal fluid within the subgluteal bursae: fluid is lying deep to either gluteal medius or minimus tendons.
MRI scan analysis for the above-described signs was done using Philips-EWS workstation by two radiologists (W.M and A.A) with experience of 10Ā years in this field (Figs. 1, 2, 3).
Statistical analysis
All data were stored on a spreadsheet (Excel 2020, Microsoft, USA) and analysis was performed using SPSS software package (v. 20, Chicago, IL). Statistical analysis was expressed in terms of mean, standard deviation (SD), minimum, and maximum. The statistical significance of differences in sex and GTPS signs on MRI was calculated using the chi-square test.
The inter-reader agreement about MR signs of GTPS was analyzed by the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) using the Pearson correlation test.
Results
MRI scans were done on 75 hip joints of 65 patients (10 patients with bilateral hips); 45 on the right hip and 30 on the left hip, of those patients 55 were females (85%) and 10 were males (15%). Their ages ranged from 34 to 74 years with mean age of 52 years (SDĀ±8.2) (Table 1).
The right hip was involved in 40 hips (53%) and the left hip was involved in 35 hips (47%). Bilateral involvement occurred in 10 hips (8%). Trochanteric (sub-gluteal maximus) bursal fluid was the most common finding found in 55 hips (73%), followed by gluteal tendinosis (64%) and partial thickness gluteal tendon tear (29%). Full thickness tear of the gluteal tendons occurred in 10 hips (13%) (Table 2).
The relation between the female sex and GTPS MR findings of 1. Gluteal tendinosis, 2. partial thickness tear and 3. Greater trochanteric bursal fluid was statistically significant (P < 0.05).
Whereas the relation between male sex and those findings was statistically insignificant (P > 0.05).
The relation between gluteal tendinosis and greater trochanteric bursal fluid was statistically significant (P < 0.05) with sensitivity and specificity of 85% and 78 % respectively, whereas the relation between gluteal tendons tears either partial or full and the presence of greater trochanteric bursal fluid was statistically significant (P < 0.05) with sensitivity and specificity of 95% and 84 % respectively.
The inter-reader agreement of ICC was 0.7 reflecting strong correlation.
Discussion
GTPS refers to lateral hip pain that is related to disorders of the located anatomical bursae and/or any of the gluteus minimus or gluteus medius tendons, that occurs more in old females [8]. In this study females were more commonly involved (85%) that was matching by the study conducted by McMahon SE et al [8] and Tortolani PJ [9] et al. as they showed that GTPS is more common in females. The mean age of GTPS in this study was 54Ā years that was of near value for the study done by Haliloglu N et al. that showed a mean age of 56 years [10].
Trochanteric bursal fluid was the most common finding in this study (73%), this was matching with the study conducted by by Haliloglu N et al. that showed that trochanteric bursal fluid was present in 70% of patients [10]. Cvitanic et al. concluded that fluid signal superior to the greater trochanter was more frequent in hips showing abductor pathology associated with high sensitivity (73%) and specificity (95%). [11].
Tears of the gluteal tendons whether partial or complete was common in this study (42%), such finding was matching with Miyasaki MR et al. study where tears of the gluteus medius tendon was the most common. [12].
Conclusion
GTPS is a frequent hip disorder that is confused sometimes with other clinical conditions of the hips or spine, MRI should be utilized in a simple systemized approach by MSK radiologist in order not to miss a finding that may influence the surgical outcome of the patient.
Availability of data and materials
All the data that this work depended on to reach the conclusion are available and to be delivered when requested.
Abbreviations
- GTPS:
-
Greater trochanteric pain syndrome
- PDFS:
-
Proton density fat suppression
References
Klauser AS, Martinoli C, Tagliafico A, Bellmann-Weiler R, Feuchtner GM, Wick M, Jaschke WR (2013) Greater trochanteric pain syndrome. In: Seminars in musculoskeletal radiology 2013 Feb (Vol. 17, No. 01, pp. 043ā048). Thieme Medical Publishers.
Kong A, Van der Vliet A, Zadow S (2007) MRI and US of gluteal tendinopathy in greater trochanteric pain syndrome. Eur Radiol 17(7):1772ā1783
Strauss EJ, Nho SJ, Kelly BT (2010) Greater trochanteric pain syndrome. Sports Med Arthrosc Rev 18(2):113ā119
Dunn T, Heller C, McCarthy SW, Dos Remedios C (2003) Anatomical study of the ātrochanteric bursa.ā Clin Anat 16(3):233ā240
Dwek J, Pfirrmann C, Stanley A, Pathria M, Chung CB (2005) MR imaging of the hip abductors: normal anatomy and commonly encountered pathology at the greater trochanter. Magn Resonan Imaging Clin 13(4):691ā704
Chowdhury R, Naaseri S, Lee J, Rajeswaran G (2014) Imaging and management of greater trochanteric pain syndrome. Postgraduate Med J. 90(1068):576
Voos JE, Shindle MK, Pruett A, Asnis PD, Kelly BT (2009) Endoscopic repair of gluteus medius tendon tears of the hip. Am J Sports Med 37(4):743ā747
McMahon SE, Smith TO, Hing CB (2012) A systematic review of imaging modalities in the diagnosis of greater trochanteric pain syndrome. Musculoskeletal Care 10(4):232ā239
Tortolani PJ, Carbone JJ, Quartararo LG (2002) Greater trochanteric pain syndrome in patients referred to orthopedic spine specialists. Spine J 2(4):251ā254
Haliloglu N, Inceoglu D, Sahin G (2010) Assessment of peritrochanteric high T2 signal depending on the age and gender of the patients. Eur J Radiol 75(1):64ā66
Cvitanic O, Henzie G, Skezas N, Lyons J, Minter J (2004) MRI diagnosis of tears of the hip abductor tendons (gluteus medius and gluteus minimus). Am J Roentgenol 182(1):137ā143
Miyasaki MR, Marcioli MAR, Cunha APRRD, Polesello GC, Marini MG, Fernandes KBP, Macedo CSG (2021) Greater trochanteric pain syndrome in women: Analysis of magnetic resonance, sagittal alignment, muscular strength and endurance of the hip and trunk. Int J Rheum Dis 24(7):941ā947
Acknowledgements
Not applicable.
Funding
No funding was received for this work.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
WM devised the project and the main conceptual ideas. WA and AA reviewed and analysed the image data. WM analysed the data. AA did the final revision and conclusion. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Approval of this retrospective research was obtained from the Alexandria medical school board review.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Amin, W.M., Abdelkerim, A.A. Greater trochanteric pain syndrome: a simplified MRI approach. Egypt J Radiol Nucl Med 53, 82 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s43055-022-00754-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s43055-022-00754-8