Skip to main content

Prenatal diagnosis of non-janiceps type of cephalopagus conjoined twins: a case report

Abstract

Background

Conjoined twin pregnancy is a very rare variety of twin pregnancy which results from the failure of complete separation of a zygote after 13 days, ‘cephalopagus’ being the rarest variety of such twin pregnancies. Two forms of cephalopagus conjoined twins have been described in the literature: Janiceps (two faces are on the either side of the head) and non-janiceps (with one head and a single face); non-janiceps type being even rarer. The features that may hint towards the diagnosis on ultrasound include inseparable fetal bodies, unvarying relative positioning of the two fetuses, both heads persistently at the same level to each other, bi-breech or bicephalic presentations and a single umbilical cord with more than three vessels. 3-D ultrasound and Fetal MRI may help in confirmation of this rare entity.

Case presentation

A 19-year-old primigravida, presented at 12 weeks of gestation for antenatal ultrasound. Ultrasonography showed evidence of a conjoined twin with a single head and single face, fused thoracic cavities with single heart, two lungs, fused upper abdomen with shared stomach and liver, separate pelvic cavities with two different urinary bladders and two pairs of upper and lower limbs. Fetal MRI corroborated these findings. The pregnancy was terminated vaginally, and cephalopagus fetus was delivered. The parents were appropriately counselled for future pregnancies.

Conclusions

A very rare case of non-Janiceps variety of cephalopagus conjoined twin gestation which was detected at 12 weeks of gestation by antenatal ultrasound and confirmed on fetal MRI. Early antenatal diagnosis is extremely important for appropriate and timely management as the prognosis is very poor in such twins. Antenatal ultrasound and fetal MRI prove very beneficial in this aspect as well as for diagnosis of other associated fetal abnormalities.

Background

Conjoined twins are a form of monozygotic monochorionic twins and occur when the embryonic plate fails to completely separate between 13 and 17 days. The exact prevalence of conjoined twins is not known. However, it varies between 1:50,000 and 1:200,000 total births [1]. It is more common in the black population and common in female fetuses [1], 1]. Conjoined twins have been classified according to the site of fusion (cranium, face, thorax, abdomen, sacrum, pelvis or back) as further detailed in Table 1 [3].

Table 1 Classification of conjoined twins according to the site of fusion

Cephalopagus twinning is the rarest type of conjoined twinning accounting for about 1 per million births [4] and has a very poor prognosis. Because of extensively shared organs, surgical separation of such twins after delivery have been rarely successful. Hence, early antenatal detection using ultrasound and fetal MRI as a complementary, non invasive modality of investigation for appropriate and timely management followed by parental counselling is necessary.

If diagnosed prior to 24 weeks, vaginal delivery is preferred. Post 24 weeks of gestation, caesarean section is preferred to avoid any birth trauma. Delivery is always preferred in a tertiary care centre for want of immediate paediatric and paediatric surgical support. Surgical separation is not done in cephalopagus twins as the success rate is negligible [5,6,7,8]. Parents need to be counselled for further pregnancies.

Case presentation

A 19-year-old female, primigravida, presented at 12 weeks of gestation for antenatal ultrasound. She had a non consanguineous marriage and had no co-morbidities. She had conceived naturally. There was no history of twinning in family. She reported for the first obstetric ultrasound to our centre. USG showed evidence of a conjoined twin with a single head with single face (a pair of eyes, one mouth, one nose), single heart within single thoracic cavity, two lungs, fused upper abdomen with shared stomach and liver, two vertebral columns, separate pelvises with two different bladders and two pairs of upper and lower limbs. The findings were better appreciated on oblique/parasagittal views than true axial sections. 3-D Ultrasound was not carried out due to technical limitations. However, the patient was taken up for fetal MRI study. Fetal MRI revealed a single head with two optic globes, two cerebral hemispheres, two spinal canals were seen to enter the base of skull, the presence of a single heart, a pair of lungs, shared liver, two urinary bladders and two pairs of upper and lower limbs were confirmed (Figs. 1,2,3).

Fig. 1
figure 1

A USG showed a conjoined twin with a single head (red arrow); B: single face with a pair of eyes (blue arrow) and one nose (red arrow)

Fig. 2
figure 2

A: Fetal MRI coronal T2WI confirmed findings of a single head with two optic globes, two cerebral hemispheres, two spinal canals seen to enter the base of skull, a single heart, a pair of lungs & shared liver(blue arrows) B: Fetus showed two urinary bladders and 2 pairs of upper and lower limbs.(blue arrows)

Fig. 3
figure 3

A single head and face were seen with two eyes, two ears, single nose, and mouth. No cleft-palate/-lip was seen (A–B). No obvious other facial structures/skin tags were identified on the other side of the head

A cephalopagus fetus was delivered vaginally.

The parents were appropriately counselled for future pregnancies.

Discussion

Conjoined twins are all monozygotic monochorionic twins and occur due to incomplete separation of the embryonic plate between 13 and 17 days [1]. Embryologically, these fusions can be ventral or dorsal. Various classifications are available of the conjoined twins. However, a commonly used classification is as described in Table 1 [2], 2].

Cephalopagus are among the least common types of ventral fusion variety of conjoined twins with an incidence of about 1 in a million births. These twins have fused head, thoracic cavity and upper part of abdominal cavity. Two forms of cephalopagus conjoined twins have been described in the literature: Janiceps which have two faces are on the either side of the head and non-Janiceps with one head and a single face; non-janiceps type being even rarer [4]. Usually, these twins die in utero or immediately after birth. The type that we encountered was a non-janiceps type of cephalopagus twins.

Among the organs, these twins usually have a conjoined heart and liver. The lower abdomen, pelvis and limbs are however not fused. High level of suspicion is required to diagnose such cases on an ultrasound. One can diagnose a conjoined twin pregnancy as early as at 12 weeks of gestation. Possibility of conjoined twin should be suspected in any monochorionic monoamniotic pregnancy (single placenta with no separating amniotic membrane) [5],5]. The findings on ultrasound that would help in diagnosing conjoined twins include inseparable fetal bodies, unvarying relative positioning of the two fetuses, both heads persistently at the same level to each other, bi-breech or bicephalic presentations and a single umbilical cord with more than three vessels [7],7]. Almost 50% of cases of conjoined twins are complicated with polyhydramnios [9]. 3-D ultrasound can help in determining the extent of fusion of conjoined twins and thus help in proper classification, which would further help in appropriate management.

Fetal MRI can help as a complimentary mode of investigation to the ultrasound as it can give reproducible fetal anatomy with better and detailed delineation of the associated congenital fetal abnormalities. MRI provides better tissue contrast and has no known deleterious effects on the fetus. The newer faster MRI sequences like HASTE or SSFE sequences provide images with good resolution, better T2-weighted contrast and lesser degradation of images due to fetal movement [10, 11]. Also, the larger field of view of MRI provides better delineation of anatomical abnormalities and relationship between normal structures.

Diagnosis of conjoined twins can be missed in case of a bicephalic fetal presentation where one of the fetal heads is engaged and another one is floating. Also in case of severe fusion, conjoined twin pregnancy may be misdiagnosed as a singleton pregnancy. In a few cases of dichorionic diamniotic twins, the separating twin membrane is not easily visible giving rise to a false suspicion/diagnosis of a conjoined twin.

Conclusions

Prior to the era of ultrasound, conjoined twins were rarely diagnosed antenatally. These usually presented with dystocia and such fetuses had to be delivered by fetal destructive manoeuvres associated with high incidence of birth injuries. Many radiological signs were described which have now become of historical importance [12, 13]. Now with the advent of 3-D ultrasound techniques and faster MRI sequences, early prenatal diagnosis and appropriate classification of conjoined twins has become easier for optimal and timely obstetric as well as post natal management.

Availability of data and material

The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

USG:

Ultrasonography

3-D:

Three dimensional

MRI:

Magnetic resonance imaging

References

  1. Hanson J (1975) Incidence of conjoined twinning. Lancet 306:1257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Mutchinick OM, Luna-Muñoz L, Amar E, Bakker MK, Clementi M, Cocchi G et al (2011) Conjoined twins: a worldwide collaborative epidemiological study of the international clearinghouse for birth defects surveillance and research. Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet 157:274–287

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Spencer R (1996) Anatomic description of conjoined twins: a plea for standardized terminology. J Pediatr Surg 31:941–944

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Kapoor R, Bansal A, Aggarwal A, Aggarwal AK, Taneja RB (2015) Prenatal diagnosis of cephalophagus conjoined twins by ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging. J Fetal Med 2:45–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Kingston CA, McHugh K, Kumaradevan J, Kiely EM, Spitz L (2001) Imaging in the preoperative assessment of conjoined twins. Radiographics 21:1187–1208

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Rishi PM, Swati F, Ram SB, Hadihally BS, Rajarathnam A, De Cunha P, Rao SV (2017) Conjoined twins—role of imaging and recent advances. J Ultrason 17(71):259–266 (PMID: 29375901)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Eris Yalcin S, Akkurt MO, Yavuz A, Yalcin Y, Sezik M (2017) Prenatal sonographic diagnosis of cephalopagus conjoined twins at 14 weeks of pregnancy. J Clin Ultrasound. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcu.22550. (PMID: 29064095)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Rode H, Fieggen AG, Brown RA, Cywes S, Davies MRQ, Hewitson JP et al (2006) Four decades of conjoined twins at red cross children’s hospital–lessons learned. S Afr Med J 96(9 Pt 2):931–940 (PMID: 17077920)

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Barth RA, Filly RA, Goldberg JD, Moore P, Silverman NH (1990) Conjoined twins: prenatal diagnosis and assessment of associated malformations. Radiology 177:201–207

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Shakudo M, Inoue Y, Mochizuki K, Manabe T, Mura K, Matsu R et al (2001) Fast MR imaging and ultrafast MR imaging of fetal central nervous system abnormalities. Osaka City Med J 47:127–135

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Casele HL, Meyer JR (2000) Ultrafast magnetic resonance imaging of cephalopagus conjoined twins. Obstet Gynecol 95:1015–1017

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Fitzgerald EJ, Toi A, Cochlin DL (1985) Conjoined twins. Antenatal ultrasound diagnosis and a review of the literature. Br J Radiol 58:1053–1056

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Borden S 4th, Rider RF, Pollard JJ, Hendren WH (1974) Radiology of conjoined twins. Intrauterine diagnosis and postnatal evaluation. Am J Roentgenol Radium Ther Nucl Med 120:424–430

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not Applicable.

Funding

No funding was obtained for this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

NS, NR and PR were involved in manuscript formation and analysis. AB helped in manuscript analysis. NS, NR and PR helped in data collection. AB contributed to data collection. All authors have read and approved the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Amit Bajpai.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Approval and consent from Institutional Ethical Committee, Armed Forces Medical College has been taken for research purpose. Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication of this case report and accompanying images.

Consent for publication

Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication of this case report and accompanying images.

Competing interests

There are no competing interests declared by the authors.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Srinath, N., Rajgarhia, N., Regmi, P. et al. Prenatal diagnosis of non-janiceps type of cephalopagus conjoined twins: a case report. Egypt J Radiol Nucl Med 54, 63 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s43055-023-01008-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s43055-023-01008-x

Keywords