Skip to main content
Egyptian Journal of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine
Download PDF

99mTc-DMSA renal cortical scanning: a comparison of planar, SPECT, and SPECT/CT imaging for the detection of renal cortical scarring

Egyptian Journal of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine volume 54, Article number: 218 (2023) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

The best way to assess renal cortical scarring is planar scintigraphy with 99mTc-dimercaptosuccinic acid (DMSA), while the value of single-photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography (SPECT/CT) is not well validated. The aim of the present study was to assess the value of planar, SPECT, and SPECT/CT scanning using 99mTc-DMSA in detecting renal cortical scarring.

Methods

Patients with clinically suspected renal cortical scar were included in this prospective cohort. 99mTc-DMSA Planar images were obtained approximately 3–4 h after intravenous injection (IV) of 185 MBq of the tracer. SPECT/CT scans were obtained immediately after the planar ones. An expert nuclear medicine doctor who was unaware of the patient's clinical history or any previous imaging results analyzed the images. Each kidney was given a score of 0 for no obvious defects, 1 for equivocal lesions, 2 for a single defect, 3 for several defects, and 4 for non-visualized/non-functioning kidney (in CT images). The results of each method were then compared to each other.

Results

One hundred eighty-six kidneys from ninety-three individuals were eligible for assessment. Planar scans detected 21 kidneys with equivocal lesions, 5 with single and 7 with multiple defects. SPECT scans detected 17 kidneys with single and 40 with multiple defects, while SPECT/CT scans revealed 5 with single and 11 with multiple defects. Only 5 of the 17 kidneys with single defects diagnosed by SPECT imaging had a scar in the SPECT/CT scans, whereas the remaining 12 had a solitary cortical cyst in the CT images. Only 11 of 40 kidneys with multiple defects on SPECT were shown to have a scar in the corresponding SPECT/CT images, whereas the rest matched to either hydro-nephrotic changes or multiple cortical cysts. Four kidneys with multiple defects on the SPECT/CT images were normal in the planar readings, were ascribed to an increase in renal background activity and a reduction in renal function.

Conclusions

In cases with suspected renal cortical scar, 99mTc-DMSA SPECT/CT scanning outperformed both planar and SPECT imaging by reducing the number of false-positive SPECT readings and false-negative planar readings.

Background

Renal scarring is a well-known, severe renal condition that can lead to life-threatening complications such as chronic renal failure and hypertension. Typically, a biopsy is performed to ascertain the cause of renal scarring; however, this invasive technique is not advisable [1, 2]. Severe pyelonephritis is the primary cause of renal scarring in childhood [3].

Renal scarring can be detected using various diagnostic techniques, such as urography, ultrasound, computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and radionuclide scintigraphy [4]. CT has a similar sensitivity and specificity to cortical scanning; but comes with a larger risk of contrast reaction and higher radiation exposure. MRI is a promising non-ionizing way, yet it is costly[5].

Renal cortical scintigraphy is used to detect cortical abnormalities associated with acute and chronic pyelonephritis. Cortical scintigraphy can detect twice as many abnormalities as ultrasound and four times as many as intravenous urography[6].

Traditionally, a Tc-99 m DMSA renal scintigraphy has been performed as a planar image. However, because planar imaging is a projection image, the photon-deficient area located behind the normal renal parenchyma may be obscured. In addition, planar scans have inadequate resolution and can miss tiny kidney abnormalities. SPECT scanning may detect relatively small photon-deficient regions with three-dimensional information and a rather homogenous background. Thus, renal SPECT imaging is a useful diagnostic technique. Recent investigations have demonstrated that Tc-99 m DMSA renal SPECT imaging offers no diagnostic advantage over planar imaging for detecting cortical abnormalities in children and adults, despite SPECT imaging has demonstrated superiority over planar imaging in a variety of clinical scenarios[7, 8].

The aim of the present study was to evaluate the value of planar, SPECT, and SPECT/CT imaging using 99mTc-DMSA in detecting renal cortical scar.

Methods

Patients

Following approval by our Institutional Review Board for this prospective study, we obtained informed consent from all study's participants (parents in case of children). The study was conducted during the period from 16 August 2020 till 16 August 2022.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients with history of pyelonephritis and clinically suspected cortical scar.

Exclusion criteria

  • Patients with significant pyelonephritic changes in the US.

  • Patients who cannot lie down comfortably without movement during the imaging period.

  • Pregnant females.

Timing of the scan: Functional changes associated with acute renal infection cannot be easily distinguished from scarring, so a delay of 3 to 6 months between the last episode of UTI and DMSA scan is acceptable[9].

Imaging protocol

  • Preparation of the patient for scintigraphy: No special patient preparation is required.

  • Planar acquisition: Planar imaging of the abdomen was taken 2 to 4 h after intravenous injection (IV) of 185 MBq of the tracer [10] (The pediatric dose was modified according to recent guidelines; 1.85 MBq /kg with a minimum dose of 18.5 MBq)[11, 12]. Using a Siemens Symbia T dual-head gamma camera fitted with a low energy all-purpose (LEAP) collimator and a 20% energy window set to 140 keV. Patients were scanned while lying on their backs and every effort was made to keep them from moving. Matrix: 256 × 256 pixels with magnification set to obtain a preferred pixel size of 2–4 mm. At least 200,000 total counts per view were obtained. Views include an anterior, posterior, 45° anterior oblique, and 45° posterior oblique.

  • SPECT/SPECT/CT acquisitions: SPECT imaging of the abdomen is performed immediately following planar imaging using the same camera and patient's position. Total of 32 frames, each frame lasting for 25 s and utilizing a 128 × 128 matrix size in a non-circular 360-degree arc. Every care was taken to avoid movement. Following the acquisition of the SPECT, a low-dose, non-contrast CT was obtained for attenuation correction and anatomical localization. The CT parameters used were; tube voltage of 130 kV, 80 mA tube current, and 5 mm slice thickness. In children, the ALARA (As Low As Reasonably Achievable) principle was followed, aiming to minimize radiation exposure to the lowest level necessary for accurate diagnosis (tube voltage of 80 kV, 20 mA tube current)[13]. The entire SPECT/CT acquisition took about 20–25 min. SPECT, CT, and fused images produced in the three conventional projections (axial, coronal, and sagittal) should be co-registered to facilitate reliable comparison between the image sets for optimal display.

  • After imaging: The patient was advised to empty his bladder frequently during the day of imaging, to reduce radiation dose to the urinary system.

Image interpretation

A nuclear medicine consultant (10 years of experience after residency training) blindly interpreted the images.

Planar images: were reviewed visually for the presence or absence of both kidneys in their normal anatomical site and size. Tracer accumulation in each kidney was graded in score points where; score 0 (normal) uniform tracer distribution with no defects, score 1; equivocal defect, score 2; single defect, score 3; multiple defects and score 4; non-visualized/non-functioning (in CT images).

SPECT and SPECT/CT scans were scored in the same way as in planar images.

Statistical tests

SPSS; 26.0 software (IBM Corp, Armonk, NY, USA) was used for data interpretation. The quantitative data were summed and reported as means ± standard deviations, while the qualitative data were expressed as frequencies and percentages. The Cohen Kappa test was used to measure the degree of agreements between the imaging methods where the degree of agreement was considered almost perfect (Kappa value: 0.81–1), substantial (Kappa value: 0.61–0.80), moderate (Kappa value: 0.41–0.60), fair (Kappa value: 0.20–0.40), slight (Kappa value: 0.00–0.20) and poor (Kappa value: < 0.00). P-Value < 0.05 was considered significant.

Results

Patients

This study recruited a total of 186 kidneys from 93 patients (55 men and 38 females, mean age: 31.9 ± 18.5, age range: 2–79 years), 24/93 patients were less than 18 years. The mean total GFR was 80.6 ± 24.7 ml/min (15–125 ml/min). The CT characteristics of each kidney are illustrated in Table 1.

Table 1 Kidney features as shown on CT
Full size table

Image analysis

On kidney-based analysis, planar images revealed 145 normal kidneys (Fig. 1), 8 non-visualized kidneys, 21kidneys with equivocal lesions, 5 with single and 7 with multiple defects. Regarding SPECT images it showed 121 normal kidneys, 8 non-visualized kidneys, no equivocal lesions, 17 kidneys with single and 40 with multiple defects, however SPECT/CT images detected 162 normal kidneys, 8 non-functioning kidneys, no equivocal lesions, 5 kidneys with single and 11 with multiple defects. Most cases with cortical defects (81.25%) had lesions in the upper or lower pole of the kidney, yet only 3 lesions were found in the middle lobe.

Fig. 1
figure 1

A 18-year-old, female patient, presented with right loin pain. A 99mTc-DMSA planar image (posterior view) demonstrating uniform tracer uptake over both kidneys. B Coronal SPECT and C the corresponding fused SPECT/CT image shows uniform tracer distribution with no detectable defects in both kidneys

Full size image

Planar and SPECT scans agreed on the reading of 132 kidneys (115 normal kidneys, 2 with single defect, 7 with multiple defects and 8 non functioning kidneys) and disagreed in the reading of 54 ones with a fair degree of agreement (Kappa value of 0.40 and P < 0.01). Planar and SPECT/CT images agreed on the readings of 151 kidneys (138 normal kidneys, one with single defect, 4 with multiple defects and 8 non functioning kidneys), they disagreed on the readings of 35 ones with a moderate degree of agreement (Kappa value of 0.41 and P < 0.01). SPECT and SPECT/CT images agreed in the reading of 141 kidneys (120 normal kidneys, 3 with single defects, 10 with multiple defects and 8 non functioning kidneys), and disagreed in the readings of 45 ones with a moderate degree of agreement (Kappa value of 0.42 and P < 0.01) (Tables 2, 3 and 4).

Table 2 Agreement between Planar and SPECT readings
Full size table
Table 3 Agreement between Planar and SPECT/CT readings
Full size table
Table 4 Agreement between SPECT and SPECT/CT readings:
Full size table

On SPECT scans; six out of the 21 kidneys with equivocal readings on the planar imaging were confirmed to be normal, 7/21 had a single defect, and 8/21 had multiple defects, whereas 19/21 were confirmed to be normal, 1/21 had a single defect, and 1/21 had multiple defects on SPECT/CT scans.

Only five of the 17 kidneys with single defects identified by SPECT scanning had a scar in the SPECT/CT scans, while the 12 remaining kidneys matched a single cortical cyst in the CT images (Figs. 2, 3 and 4). 11 out of 40 kidneys with multiple positive defects in the SPECT imaging were confirmed to have a scar in SPECT/CT scans. The remaining kidneys corresponded to either hydro-nephrotic changes or multiple cortical cysts. Four kidneys with multiple defects in the SPECT/CT scans were normal in planar imaging, which were ascribed to reduced renal function and increased extra-renal background activity.

Fig. 2
figure 2

A 25-year-old, male patient, presented with left loin pain. A 99mTc-DMSA planar image (posterior view) demonstrating equivocal defect at the lower outer aspect of the left kidney (red arrow), B axial SPECT image revealed multiple left cortical defects (blue arrows), C the corresponding fused SPECT/CT and D the CT images shows that these defects are corresponding to multiple simple cortical cysts (yellow arrows)

Full size image
Fig. 3
figure 3

A 43-year-old, male patient, presented with right loin pain. A 99mTc-DMSA planar image (posterior view) demonstrating defect at the upper outer aspect of the right kidney (red arrow), B axial SPECT image revealed right cortical defects (blue arrow), C the corresponding fused SPECT/CT and D the CT images shows that the defect is corresponding to simple cortical cyst (yellow arrows)

Full size image
Fig. 4
figure 4

A 50-year-old, female patient, presented with left loin pain. A 99mTc-DMSA planar image (posterior view) demonstrating defect at the lower pole of the right kidney (red arrow) and hardly visualized left one, B axial SPECT image revealed right lower cortical defect (blue arrow) and non functioning left kidney, C the corresponding fused SPECT/CT and D the CT images shows that the defect is corresponding to small exophytic right cortical cyst (yellow arrows) as well as hydronephrotic left kidney

Full size image

Discussion

Urinary tract infection is regarded as one of the most common bacterial infections in children, acute pyelonephritis may lead to renal scarring which may cause later renal sequel, such as hypertension and renal insufficiency [14].

99mTc- DMSA scan is currently the gold standard for detecting renal parenchymal abnormalities, particularly scarring in pyelonephritis [15]. Various acquisition techniques, such as planar parallel-hole collimator imaging, planar high-resolution parallel-hole collimator imaging, pinhole collimator imaging, SPECT, and pinhole SPECT, have been utilized [16].

Planar imaging is the most widely used approach; however, it is limited to two-dimensional data. SPECT is employed in certain centers as it is thought to be more sensitive and add some specificity. However the 3D aspect of SPECT alone suffers from a lack of precision and accuracy in diagnosis due to lack of accurate anatomical information, the use of hybrid imaging techniques with SPECT-CT may help in diagnostic accuracy and ultimately patient management[17].

In the present study, we assessed the value of 99mTc- DMSA renal cortical planar, SPECT and SPECT/CT imaging in detecting renal cortical scarring.

In concordance with ours, several studies found a higher percentage of cortical defects to be located at the upper and lower zones of both kidneys and attributed this predominant polar distribution of renal cortical scarring to be related to the reflux of sterile or infected urine into compound or refluxing papillae situated at the renal poles [18,19,20,21].

In meta-analysis comparing DMSA SPECT to planar imaging revealed that the former had small number of true-positive results at the expense of larger percentage of false-positive with the overall test performance is not demonstrably superior to planar DMSA, similarly we found a high number (41) of false-positive lesions [22].

In line with our results, Everaert et al. reported that SPECT detected more defects than planar imaging, although there was no statistical significance [23].

Several studies have evaluated the value of Tc-99 m DMSA renal triple-detector SPECT compared to planar imaging and revealed promising results for SPECT and that high-resolution SPECT scanning increase the ability to detect cortical defects and depict the asymmetry of renal cortical thickness, the discrepancy in results may be attributed to the better image resolution provided by the triple-detector SPECT with ultra-high-resolution collimators; however, this triple-detector system is currently not widely available[24, 25].

Shah et al., stated that the utilization of SPECT/CT with DMSA can help to identify the etiology of the photopenic defect, for example, due to fetal lobulation, scarring, cyst or renal tumors[26]. Einarsdóttir et al., concluded that SPECT/CT may boost reader confidence further by defining renal structures and enhancing specificity by offering diagnostic hints to lesions that are not scarring [27], in line with the previously mentioned studies we found that SPECT CT accurately ruled out scaring in 41 kidneys where the defects corresponded to a solitary renal cortical cyst, hydro-nephrotic changes or multiple cortical cysts,.

Tc-99 m DMSA uptake in the thin cortex of hydronephrotic kidney was susceptible to partial volume effects in SPECT that it appears as reduced uptake regions resembling renal scar. In such case, regional uptake defects shown by DMSA scintigraphy may include renal scars as well as some false positives and other problems like fetal lobulation and splenic impression[18]; according to that, we interpreted our results, where only 5/17 kidneys with single lesions and 11/40 with multiple lesions had been proved to have scars in the SPECT/CT scans while the remaining lesions corresponded to a solitary renal cortical cyst, either hydro-nephrotic changes or multiple cortical cysts, so SPECT CT accurately ruled out scaring in 41 kidneys.

SPECT CT successfully diagnose scarring (multiple defects) in four kidneys with normal planar imaging, and this was ascribed to reduced renal function and increased renal background activity; these figures come in agreement with those of Farghaly et al.[28].

Limitations and recommendations

The small sample size and the heterogeneous age of the study population were the current limitations of our study. On the contrary, the advantage of our study was the use of SPECT/CT imaging, which helped reduce false results of SPECT and planar imaging. We recommend further prospective study with a larger sample size to validate our results; additionally, we recommend using SPECT/CT in cases with equivocal readings in planar images and patients with decreased renal function and subsequently raised background activity.

Conclusion

In cases with suspected renal cortical scar, 99mTc-DMSA SPECT/CT scanning outperformed both planar and SPECT scanning by reducing the number of false-positive SPECT readings and false-negative planar readings.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author reasonable on request.

Abbreviations

99mTc-:

Technetium 99 m

DMSA:

Dimercaptosuccinic acid

SPECT:

Single-photon emission computed tomography

SPECT/CT:

Single-photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography

IV:

Intravenous

MBq:

Mega Beqrel

LEAP:

Low energy all-purpose

References

  1. Park YS (2012) Renal scar formation after urinary tract infection in children. Korean J Pediatr 55(10):367

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Bandari B, Sindgikar SP, Kumar SS, Vijaya MS, Shankar R (2019) Renal scarring following urinary tract infections in children. Sudanese J Paediatr 19(1):25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Olson PD, McLellan LK, Liu A, Briden KE, Tiemann KM, Daugherty AL, et al. Correction: Renal scar formation and kidney function following antibiotic-treated murine pyelonephritis. Disease Models & Mechanisms. 2018;11(9).

  4. Napolitano M, Ravelli A. Urinary tract infections in infants and children. Imaging and intervention in urinary tract infections and urosepsis: Springer; 2018. p. 231–46.

  5. Sriman R, Venkatesh K, Mathew C, Pankaj M, Shankar R (2020) Validity of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of acute pyelonephritis in comparison with contrast-enhanced computed tomography. Pol J Radiol 85:e137

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Thiyaneshwaran S, Rajendran K, Kamaleshwaran K. Comparison of Renal Ultrasonography and Technetium 99-M Dimercaptosuccinic acid Renal Cortical Scintigraphy in Identifying Renal Parenchymal Defects in Febrile Urinary Tract Infection In Children Less than Five Years Age.

  7. Vali R, Armstrong IS, Bar-Sever Z, Biassoni L, Borgwardt L, Brown J, et al. SNMMI procedure standard/EANM practice guideline on pediatric [99mTc] Tc-DMSA renal cortical scintigraphy: an update. Clinical and Translational Imaging. 2022:1–12.

  8. Kim GE, Park JH, Kim JS, Won KS, Kim HW (2019) Comparison of Tc-99m DMSA renal planar scan and SPECT for detection of cortical defects in infants with suspected acute pyelonephritis. Indian J Pediatr 86(9):797–802

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Vessal S, Balasubramaniam S, Bera SK, Williams NR (2004) Timing of DMSA studies post-UTI. Nucl Med Commun 25(4):419

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Blaufox MD, De Palma D, Taylor A, Szabo Z, Prigent A, Samal M et al (2018) The SNMMI and EANM practice guideline for renal scintigraphy in adults. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 45:2218–2228

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Lassmann M, Biassoni L, Monsieurs M, Franzius C, Jacobs F (2007) The new EANM paediatric dosage card. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 34(5):796–798

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Li Y, O’Reilly S, Plyku D, Treves ST, Fahey F, Du Y et al (2019) Current pediatric administered activity guidelines for 99mTc-DMSA SPECT based on patient weight do not provide the same task-based image quality. Med Phys 46(11):4847–4856

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Nagayama Y, Oda S, Nakaura T, Tsuji A, Urata J, Furusawa M et al (2018) Radiation dose reduction at pediatric CT: use of low tube voltage and iterative reconstruction. Radiographics 38(5):1421–1440

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Jääskeläinen J, Renko M, Kuitunen I. Corticosteroids to prevent renal scarring in children with pyelonephritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Nephrol. 2023:1–10.

  15. Sarikaya I, Albatineh AN, Sarikaya A (2020) 99mTc-dimercaptosuccinic acid scan versus MRI in pyelonephritis: a meta-analysis. Nucl Med Commun 41(11):1143–1152

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Brenner M, Bonta D, Eslamy H, Ziessman HA (2009) Comparison of 99mTc-DMSA dual-head SPECT versus high-resolution parallel-hole planar imaging for the detection of renal cortical defects. Am J Roentgenol 193(2):333–337

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. El-Bejou SM, Bouhali O, Nortje LJ, Almeida AI, Shabani A, Djekidel M. Hybrid Imaging with SPECT-CT and SPECT-MR in Renal Scintigraphy. Soc Nuclear Med; 2020.

  18. Itoh K, Yamashita T, Tsukamoto E, Nonomura K, Furudate M, Koyanagi T (1995) Qualitative and quantitative evaluation of renal parenchymal damage by99mTc-DMSA planar and SPECT scintigraphy. Ann Nucl Med 9(1):23–28

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Kullendorff C, Evander E, editors. Distribution of renal parenchymal damage on 99m-Tc DMSA scintigraphy in vesico-ureteric reflux. Annales Chirurgiae et Gynaecologiae; 1990.

  20. Ransley P, Risdon R (1975) Renal papillary morphology and intrarenal reflux in the young pig. Urol Res 3(3):105–109

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Ransley P, Risdon R (1975) Renal papillary morphology in infants and young children. Urol Res 3(3):111–113

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Craig JC, Wheeler DM, Irwig L, Howman-Giles RB (2000) How accurate is dimercaptosuccinic acid scintigraphy for the diagnosis of acute pyelonephritis? A meta-analysis of experimental studies. J Nucl Med 41(6):986–993

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Everaert H, Flamen P, Franken P, Peeters P, Bossuyt A, Piepsz A (1996) 99Tcm-DMSA renal scintigraphy for acute pyelonephritis in adults: planar and/or SPET imaging? Nucl Med Commun 17(10):884–889

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Tarkington MA, Fildes RD, Levin K, Ziessman H, Harkness B, Gibbons MD (1990) High resolution single photon emission computerized tomography (SPECT) 99mtechnetium-dimercapto-succinic acid renal imaging: a state of the art technique. J Urol 144(2):598–600

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Applegate KE, Connolly LP, Davis RT, Zurakowski D, Treves S (1997) A prospective comparison of high-resolution planar, pinhole, and triple-detector SPECT for the detection of renal cortical defects. Clin Nucl Med 22(10):673–678

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Shah S, Ferreira B, Parthipun A, editors. Does software fusion with CT aid diagnosis of photopenic defects on DMSA SPECT?–A Pictorial Case Review2019: European Congress of Radiology-ECR 2019.

  27. Einarsdóttir HS, Berg RMG, Borgwardt L (2020) Interrater reliability of 99mTc-DMSA scintigraphy performed as planar scan vs. SPECT/low dose CT for diagnosing renal scarring in children. Diagnostics 10(12):1101

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Farghaly HRS, Sayed MHM (2015) Technetium-99m dimercaptosuccinic acid scan in evaluation of renal cortical scarring: Is it mandatory to do single photon emission computerized tomography? Indian Journal of Nuclear Medicine: IJNM: The Official Journal of the Society of Nuclear Medicine. India 30(1):26

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

The authors state clearly that they did not receive any fund, grant or financial support during the preparation and implementation of this research work from any official, non-official or commercial organization.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Clinical Oncology and Nuclear Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Assiut University, Assiut, Egypt

    Nsreen R. A. Mohamadien, Mohamed A. Mekkaway & Waleed A. Diab

  2. Department of Radiotherapy and Nuclear Medicine, South Egypt Cancer Institute, Assiut University, Assiut, Egypt

    Marwa S. Mohamed

  3. Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiodiagnosis, Faculty of Medicine, Assiut University Hospital, Assiut, Egypt

    Wageeh A. Ali

Authors
  1. Nsreen R. A. Mohamadien
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Marwa S. Mohamed
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Mohamed A. Mekkaway
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Wageeh A. Ali
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Waleed A. Diab
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

All authors contributed to study concepts and design; WAA, NRAM, WAD, MAM. MMA, MSM contributed to case recruitments, imaging data interpretation and analysis. All authors contributed to literature research, manuscript drafting, revision and editing. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wageeh A. Ali.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study has been approved by the Ethical Committee of the Faculty of Medicine, Assiut University, assigned the approval IRB number: 17101168. An informed written consent was obtained from all the participants in the study. Confidentiality and data anonymity were maintained during all steps of the study.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors of this study state clearly that there is no actual or potential competing of interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mohamadien, N.R.A., Mohamed, M.S., Mekkaway, M.A. et al. 99mTc-DMSA renal cortical scanning: a comparison of planar, SPECT, and SPECT/CT imaging for the detection of renal cortical scarring. Egypt J Radiol Nucl Med 54, 218 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s43055-023-01156-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s43055-023-01156-0

Keywords