Skip to main content
Egyptian Journal of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine
Egyptian Journal of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine Cover Image
Download PDF

The diagnostic value of PET/CT imaging with the 68Ga-labeled PSMA-ligand in the follow up assessment of prostate cancer after therapy

Egyptian Journal of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine volume 51, Article number: 136 (2020) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

The aim of this study is to investigate the role of PET/CT imaging with the 68Ga-labeled PSMA-ligand in the follow up assessment of post-operative and post-therapeutic cases of prostate cancer. All data were collected and analyzed retrospectively, enrolling 30 patients (their age range from 53 to 80 years with a mean age 67.8). The patients had been referred to a private imaging center for their assessment by 68Ga-labeled PSMA-ligand PET/CT.

Results

By 68Ga-labeled PSMA-ligand PET/CT, prostatic recurrent/residual neoplastic lesion was depicted in 23 (76.6%) patients, nodal metastases was present in 7 (23.3%) patients, and distant metastasis was present in 11 (36.6%) patients. The clinical and/or PSA level and/or radiological follow-up and/or the histopathological assessment for the patients served as a reference in the present study.The 68Ga-labeled PSMA-ligand PET/CT had sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and an overall accuracy (96.5%, 100%, 100%, 50%, and 96.6%) respectively.

Conclusion

68Ga-labeled PSMA-ligand PET/CT is a very helpful tool for detection of prostatic cancer residual/recurrent lesions and restaging which can help in performing treatment plans and improve the clinical outcome and survival of the patients.

Background

Prostate cancer is the most common neoplasm in men worldwide and an increasing number of cases has been noted in recent years [1]. Tumor recurrence/residual after prostatectomy, radiotherapy, or other local treatment modalities represents a great obstacle in the management of prostatic cancer. Usually, post-therapeutic recurrence, after prostatectomy or external beam radiation therapy, can be diagnosed by prostate-specific antigen (PSA) values of ≥ 0.2 ng/mL in two succesive tests and this is called biochemical recurrence [2].

Early diagnosis of recurrent prostatic neoplastic lesions gives better chance for early treatment and better prognosis. Also, if the recurrent tumor is localized, it can be managed by surgery or external radiation therapy and systemic therapy and its side effects can be avoided or delayed. So, an accurate diagnostic modality with high sensitivity and specificity is needed to be able to do this approach [3].

Morphologic imaging methods, like transrectal ultrasound or CT, show limitations and their sensitivity ranges between 25 and 54% for the detection of local recurrence, and these parameters are moderately improved using functional MR imaging techniques [4, 5].Also, the CT or MR shows sensitivity about 30–80% for diagnosis of lymph node metastases [6].

Most prostate cancers use non-glucose metabolic pathways such as fatty acid metabolism or fructose metabolism.So FDG, which is the most widely used PET tracer in oncologic imaging, is of limited use in prostate cancer [7, 8].

Various PET tracers have been used to improve the detection of recurrent prostate cancer and mainly 11C- and 11F-labeled choline tracers have been used in the past [7–9]. However, the detection rate of these tracers is only 40–60%, especially in patients with PSA values below 3 ng/mL [5, 9, 10].

Therefore, PET/CT imaging with the 68Ga-labeled PSMA-ligand, as new and improved imaging method for prostate cancer, has recently received increased attention [11,12,13,14,15]. PSMA is a cell surface protein that is significantly overexpressed in prostatic cells. Other tissues, like salivary gland, proximal small intestine, and kidney, express PSMA but to a lesser extent compared to prostatic cells [16, 17]. It therefore provides a promising target for prostate cancer specific imaging and therapy [18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25].

Methods

All data were collected and analyzed in a retrospective pattern; enrolling 30 patients who had 68Ga-labeled PSMA-ligand PET-CT examination in the period from September 2018 till February 2020; they were cases of treated prostatic malignancy. All patients were referred to a private imaging center for their assessment by 68Ga-labeled PSMA-ligand PET/CT and for the evaluation of their treatment response. Patients gave informed consent prior to the PET/CT scan. The study was approved by the local research ethical committee.

Inclusion criteria

Cases of prostatic cancer who had curative surgical resection (prostatectomy), chemotherapy, radiotherapy, hormonal therapy, or any combination of them.

Exclusion criteria

The patients who had prostatic malignancy but had not received any treatment were excluded.

Physical and biological background of PSMA

PSMA is a large transmembrane glycoprotein with a small intracellular and transmembrane component and a large extracellular component. PSMA expression is 100–1000 times more in prostate cancer than other tissues, even benign prostate cells, and PSMA expression increases with increasing tumor stage and grade and in castration-resistant prostate cancers. The name PSMA is conflicting, because PSMA expression is not specific to prostate cells or prostate cancer. PSMA expression has been reported in unrelated benign and malignant conditions in a number of case reports [26].

68Ga-labeled PSMA-ligand targets the extracellular domain of PSMA with strong binding affinity and is internalized into the endosomal recycling system, with rapid blood clearance and low background activity, characteristics that lead to high-quality images with high tumor-to-background ratios. Yet, 5% of prostatic cancers do not show significant 68Ga-labeled PSMA-ligand uptake [27].

Physiologic uptake of 68Ga-labeled PSMA-ligand is seen in:

  1. (a)

    The lacrimal and salivary glands, liver, spleen, kidneys, and intestine [21].

  2. (b)

    Celiac ganglia, which are located in front of the crura in a para-aortic location and should not be misinterpreted as metastatic lymph nodes [28].

  3. (c)

    Cervicothoracic ganglion, which lies anterior to the transverse process of the seventh cervical vertebra, inferior to the subclavian artery and superior to the neck of the first rib [29].

  4. (d)

    Bone marrow 68Ga-PSMA activity is less than 18F-FDG activity, a finding that potentially allows better detection of bone metastases with 68Ga-PSMA ligands [27].

  5. (e)

    Unbound 68Ga-PSMA tracer is excreted by the kidneys into the ureters and urinary bladder [27].

  • Focal physiologic ureteric activity can limit the assessment of small adjacent pelvic or retroperitoneal nodes [27].

  • Physiologic urinary bladder activity may mask the prostate bed, particularly if the SUV threshold has not been adequately adjusted [27].

  • Physiologic urethral activity of 68Ga-PSMA—especially after treatment with high-intensity focused ultrasound or transurethral resection of the prostate—can mask or mimic disease recurrence [27].

Imaging technique

  • No preparation is required before 68Ga-labeled PSMA-legand injection.

  • 68Ga has a half-life of 68 min.

  • A dose of 2 MBq/kg of 68Ga-PSMA was injected intravenously and then the patients were relaxed for 1 h that was considered as the uptake period.

  • The PET/CT system using a multi-detector (sixteen detectors) CT machine (GE, Discovery IQ, USA) was used for the patients’ examination.

  • For the sake of attenuation correction and image fusion, non-contrast enhanced CT images were taken.

  • Then PET scan was done and the examination levels were extending from the vertex to the knee levels.

  • The total acquisition time for the integrated PET/CT scan was 20–30 min.

Data analysis and interpretation

A special workstation using special software (Advantage Windows VS4; GE Healthcare, Wisconsin, USA) was used for the reconstruction of PET image data sets using the CT data for attenuation correction and image fusion to obtain co-registered multiplanar PET-CT images.

Two conjoint radiologists (5 years of experience in the PET/CT imaging) revised the CT, PET, and the fused PET/CT images using visual assessment (considering the background activity as a standard reference for the same patient) and semi-quantitative assessment (by measuring the standardized uptake value (SUV) which was automatically calculated by special software).

The clinical and/or PSA level and/or radiological follow-up and/or the histopathological assessment for the patients served as a reference in the present study.

Interpretation of the PET/CT findings

The prostatic operative bed soft tissue masses or irregular soft tissue thickening were considered as positive for residual/recurrent neoplastic lesions if their tracer uptake was higher than the background activity.

If the patient did not have operation, the prostatic tracer uptake was considered as positive for residual/recurrent neoplastic lesions if its tracer uptake was higher than the background activity. A quantitative SUV cut-off value for prostatic cancer lesions does not exist [30].

Any lymph node with tracer activity more than the background activity was considered metastatic even if it was subcentemetric.

The pulmonary nodules that had a size of 5 mm or more were considered as positive for malignancy if their tracer uptake was exceeding the background activity; nevertheless, a metastatic disease could not be completely ruled out if the pulmonary nodules were less than 5 mm in their size.

If the bone marrow exhibited an obvious focal tracer avidity, we looked in CT to exclude benign bony lesions that may show increased 68Ga-PSMA uptake like Paget disease or healing fractures; otherwise, it was considered as positive for infiltration.

Statistical methods

Data management and analysis were performed using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) vs. 23. Numerical data were summarized using means, standard deviations, and ranges, as appropriate. Categorical data were summarized as numbers and percentages. The data were collected, analyzed, and tabulated. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and the accuracy of the PET/CT in the diagnosis of recurrent prostatic cancer were calculated using the standard definitions [31].

Results

This study included 30 patients; age ranged from 53 to 80 years (mean 67.86) (Table 1).

Table 1 Demonstrating the range of age in years
Full size table

All patients were treated by one or more of the following treatment methods: operative intervention, chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and hormonal therapy (Table 2).

Table 2 Treatment methods for the patients in the study with demonstration of their number (No.) and percent (%)
Full size table

Residual/recurrent malignancy was categorized as operative bed/prostatic recurrence/residual lesions, metastatic lymph nodes, and distant metastatic lesions (Table 3 and Figs. 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5).

Table 3 Patterns of tumor recurrence/residual including lymph nodes and distant metastases by 68Ga-labelled PSMA-ligand PET/CT study with their number (No.) and percent (%)
Full size table
Fig. 1
figure1

Axial non-contrast CT and PET-CT images for a 62-year-old male patient with history of prostate cancer for which he had chemotherapy and radiotherapy. Images a and b (baseline study) showed focal prostatic 68Ga-PSMA activity with SUVmax = 9.2 denoting residual neoplastic lesion that showed activity regression in images c and d (follow up study) showing SUVmax = 3.4 (red arrows). Images e and f (baseline study) showed metastatic low-grade 68Ga-PSMA activity by subcentimetric right external iliac lymph node with SUVmax = 3.5 and showed activity regression in images g and h (follow up study) with SUVmax = 1.7 (blue arrows). Images i and j (baseline study) showed small right femoral neck sclerotic lesion with minimal 68Ga-PSMA activity that was considered insignificant, yet it showed activity progression in images k and l (follow up study) with SUVmax = 9.6 (green arrows)

Full size image
Fig. 2
figure2

Axial non-contrast CT and PET-CT images for a 72-year-old male patient with history of prostate cancer for which he had operation, chemotherapy, and hormonal therapy. Images a and b (baseline study) showed no 68Ga-PSMA activity at the operative bed with no significant changes in images c and d (follow up study) (red arrows). Images e and f (baseline study) showed 68Ga-PSMA activity by enlarged metastatic right hilar lymph node measuring 14 mm with SUVmax = 11.7 and showed activity regression in images g and h (follow up study) with SUVmax = 7.3 (blue arrows)

Full size image
Fig. 3
figure3

Axial non-contrast CT and PET-CT images for a 79-year-old male patient with history of prostate cancer for which he had radiotherapy and hormonal therapy. Images a and b showed 68Ga-PSMA activity by small prostatic lesion with SUVmax = 2.5 (red arrows) suggesting small residual neoplastic lesion. Images c–f showed 68Ga-PSMA activity by multiple small bilateral external and common iliac LNs; the most active shows SUVmax = 15.4 (blue arrows). The PET-CT revealed metastatic deposits in the iliac lymph nodes despite their subcentimetric size in CT. Images g and h showed multiple sclerotic osseous lesions involving the right iliac bone and sacrum with no 68Ga-PSMA activity (green arrows) denoting inactive metastatic lesions

Full size image
Fig. 4
figure4

Axial non-contrast CT and PET-CT images for a 60-year-old male patient with history of prostate cancer for which he had chemotherapy and radiotherapy. Images a and b showed prostatic lesion with 68Ga-PSMA activity with SUVmax = 17.5 with posterior extra-prostatic extension and obliteration of the recto-prostatic space (red arrows), denoting residual neoplastic lesion. Images c and d showed 68Ga-PSMA activity by metastatic left external iliac lymph node with SUVmax = 10.6 (blue arrows). Images a–d showed 68Ga-PSMA activity by metastatic sclerotic osseous lesions involving the pelvic bones (green arrows)

Full size image
Fig. 5
figure5

Axial non-contrast CT and PET-CT images for a 61-year-old male patient with history of prostate cancer for which he had radiotherapy and hormonal therapy. Images a and b showed focal prostatic 68Ga-PSMA activity with SUVmax = 4.7 (red arrows) denoting residual neoplastic lesion. Images a–d showed marked 68Ga-PSMA activity by metastatic left iliac nodal mass lesion encroaching on the left obturator and sacro-sciatic foramina with SUVmax = 50.1 (blue arrows). Images e and f showed marked 68Ga-PSMA activity by metastatic osseous lesions involving the right inferior pubic ramus and both proximal femora, the most active shows SUVmax = 45.4 (green arrows) with no gross corresponding CT findings

Full size image

Using the clinical and/or PSA level and/or radiological follow-up and/or the histopathological assessment for the patients as a reference, the 68Ga-labeled PSMA-ligand PET/CT (for the tumor recurrence/residual) had sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and an overall accuracy (96.5%, 100%, 100%, 50%, and 96.6%) respectively (Tables 4 and 5).

Table 4 Tumor recurrence/residual detected by 68Ga-labelled PSMA-ligand PET/CT in reference to the clinical and/or PSA level and/or radiological follow-up and/or the histopathological assessment for the patients, with the number (No.), percent (%) of the patients
Full size table
Table 5 Accuracy measures for tumoural residual\recurrence as detected by 68Ga-labelled PSMA-ligand PET/CT
Full size table

Discussion

The highly promising method (68Ga-labeled PSMA-ligand PET/CT) proved to have a significant step forward in the diagnosis of recurrent prostatic cancer [20,21,22, 32]. This imaging modality is based on the observation that most adenocarcinomas of the prostate gland express PSMA to which 68Ga-labeled PSMA-ligand is able to bind with very high affinity [33, 34].

In our study, 68Ga-labeled PSMA-ligand PET/CT was positive for tumor recurrence (either operative bed, nodal, or distant metastases) in 28 (96.5%) of patients and negative in 2 (3.5%) of patients; however, Afshar-Oromieh et al. [30] who studied 319 patients with prostatic cancer and underwent treatment found that 68Ga-labeled PSMA-ligand PET/CT imaging showed a positive diagnosis in 264 (82.8%) patients and a negative diagnosis in 55 (17.2%) patients. Also, Matthias et al. [35] who studied 248 patients with prostatic cancer and underwent radical prostatectomy noticed that 68Ga-labeled PSMA-ligand PET/CT imaging was negative in 26 (10.5%) patients and positive in 222 (89.5%) patients, while Mattiolli et al. [36] who studied 125 patients with prostatic cancer and underwent treatment showed that 68Ga-labeled PSMA-ligand PET/CT resulted in a positive diagnosis in 80 (64%) patients and a negative diagnosis in 25 (36%) patients (these differences in the results may be due to small sample size in the present study).

In the current work, 68Ga-labeled PSMA-ligand PET/CT detected the operative bed/prostatic neoplastic residual or recurrence in 23 (76.6%) patients, abdomino-pelvic nodal metastases in 5 (16.6%) patients, mediastinal nodal metastases in 5 (16.6%) patients, lung metastases in 3 (10%) patients, bone metastases in 10 (33.3%) patients, and adrenal metastases in 1 (3.3%) patient denoting that pelvi-abdominal lymph node and bone metastases are the more frequent metastases in prostate cancer. These results agreed with Matthias et al. [35] who noticed that 68Ga-labeled PSMA-ligand PET/CT imaging detected operative bed local recurrence after radical prostatectomy in 87 (35.1%) patients, abdomino-pelvic nodal metastases in 130 (52.4) patients, supra-diaphragmatic nodal metastases in 13 (5.2%) patients, bone metastases in 89 (35.9%) patients, and liver/lung metastases in 13 (5.2%) patients. Also, in a multicentric study done by Mattiolli et al. [36], 68Ga-labeled PSMA-ligand PET/CT detected local recurrence in 38 (30.9%) patients, loco-regional lymph node metastases in 55 (44.4%) patients, extra-pelvic abdominal lymph node metastases in 15 (12.5%) patients, thoracic lymph node metastases in 22 (17.5%) patients, visceral metastases in 17 (13.6%) patients, and bone metastases in 37 (29.6%) patients, and these results are close to our study results.

In our study, our results demonstrated that 68Ga-labeled PSMA-ligand PET/CT had sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and accuracy of 96%, 100%, 100%, 50%, and 96.6 % respectively. These results were close to the results reached by Afshar-Oromieh et al. [30] who studied 319 patients with prostatic cancer and underwent treatment and had 68Ga-labeled PSMA-ligand PET/CT examination and the PET-CT results were correlated with the histopathological examination in 42 patients and found patient-based sensitivity about 88.1% and lesion-based sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV about 76.6%, 100%, 100%, and 91.4% in detecting recurrent disease in these patients. Also, Fitzpatrick et al. [37] did survey for 24 studies investigating the accuracy of 68Ga-labeled PSMA-ligand PET/CT in detecting recurrent prostate cancer lesions and found that PET/CT was associated with sensitivity and specificity values of 33–93% and > 99% respectively and these results agreed with our study. Also, our results agreed with Fourquet et al. [38] who studied the impact of 68Ga-labeled PSMA-ligand PET/CT in restaging 30 patients with castration-resistant non-metastatic prostate cancer and found that the overall sensitivity and specificity of 68Ga-labeled PSMA-ligand PET/CT in detecting residual disease were 87% and 100% respectively.

This study had some limitations like the retrospective nature, small number of patients due to limited availability of the 68Ga PSMA radiotracer, and expensive cost of the scan. Further studies with larger sample of patients will give us more information about the role of this tracer in detecting recurrent prostate cancer. Also, we recommend comparative studies between 68Ga-labeled PSMA-ligand PET/CT and 99Tc bone scan for skeletal imaging in prostate cancer.

Conclusion

Our study showed 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT is a very helpful tool for detection of prostatic cancer recurrence and restaging which can help in performing treatment plans and improve the clinical outcome and survival of the patients.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

PET/CT:

Positron emission tomography/computed tomography

68Ga:

68 Gallium

PSMA:

Prostatic-specific membrane antigen

PSA:

Prostate-specific antigen

FDG:

Fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose

SUV:

Standardized uptake value

References

  1. 1.

    Siegel R, Ma J, Zou Z, Jemal A (2014) Cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin 64:9–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Aus G, Abbou CC, Bolla M, Heidenreich A, Schmid HP, Van Poppel H et al (2005) EAU guidelines on prostate cancer. Eur Urol 48:546–551

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Kosuri S, Akhtar NH, Smith M, Osborne JR, Tagawa ST (2012) Review of salvage therapy for biochemically recurrent prostate cancer: the role of imaging and rationale for systemic salvage targeted anti-prostate specific membrane antigen radioimmunotherapy. Adv Urol 2012:921674

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Bott SRJ (2004) Management of recurrent disease after radical prostatectomy. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis 7:211–216

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Beer AJ, Eiber M, Souvatzoglou M et al (2011) Radionuclide and hybrid imaging of recurrent prostate cancer. Lancet Oncol 12:181–191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Oyen RH, Van Poppel HP, Ameye FE et al (1994) Lymph node staging of localized prostatic carcinoma with CT and CT-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy: prospective study of 285 patients. Radiology 190:315–322

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Liu Y, Zuckier LS, Ghesani NV (2010) Dominant uptake of fatty acid over glucose by prostate cells: a potential new diagnostic and therapeutic approach. Anticancer Res 30(2):369–374

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Reinicke K, Sotomayor P, Cisterna P, Delgado C, Nualart F, Godoy A (2012) Cellular distribution of Glut-1 and Glut-5 in benign and malignant human prostate tissue. J Cell Biochem 113(2):553–562

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Castellucci P, Picchio M (2013) 11C-choline PET/CT and PSA kinetics. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 40(suppl 1):S36–S40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Krause BJ, Souvatzoglou M, Tuncel M et al (2008) The detection rate of [11C] choline-PET/CT depends on the serum PSA-value in patients with biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 35:18–23

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Hillier SM, Maresca KP, Femia FJ, Marquis JC, Foss CA, Nguyen N et al (2009) Preclinical evaluation of novel glutamate-urea-lysine analogues that target prostate-specific membrane antigen as molecular imaging pharmaceuticals for prostate cancer. Cancer Res 69:6932–6940

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Eder M, Schäfer M, Bauder-Wüst U, Hull WE, Wängler C, Mier W et al (2012) 68Ga-complex lipophilicity and the targeting property of a urea based PSMA inhibitor for PET imaging. Bioconjug Chem 23:688–697

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Schäfer M, Bauder-Wüst U, Leotta K, Zoller F, Mier W, Haberkorn U et al (2012) A dimerized urea-based inhibitor of the prostate-specific membrane antigen for 68Ga-PET imaging of prostate cancer. EJNMMI Res 2:23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Bander NH (2006) Technology insight: monoclonal antibody imaging of prostate cancer. Nat Clin Pract Urol 3:216–225

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Liu H, Moy P, Kim S, Xia Y, Rajasekaran A, Navarro V et al (1997) Monoclonal antibodies to the extracellular domain of prostate specific membrane antigen also react with tumor vascular endothelium. Cancer Res 57:3629–3634

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Sweat SD, Pacelli A, Murphy GP, Bostwick DG (1998) Prostate-specific membrane antigen expression is greatest in prostate adenocarcinoma and lymph node metastases. Urology 52:637–640

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Mannweiler S, Amersdorfer P, Trajanoski S, Terrett JA, King D, Mehes G (2009) Heterogeneity of prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) expression in prostate carcinoma with distant metastasis. Pathol Oncol Res 15:167–172

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Chen Y, Pullambhatla M, Foss CA, Byun Y, Nimmagadda S, Senthamizhchelvan S et al (2011) 2-(3-{1-Carboxy-5-[(6-[18F]fluoro-pyridine-3-carbonyl)-amino]-pentyl}-ureido)-pen tanedioic acid,[18F]DCFPyL, a PSMA-based PET imaging agent for prostate cancer. Clin Cancer Res 17:7645–7653

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Eder M, Eisenhut M, Babich J, Haberkorn U (2013) PSMA as a target for radiolabelled small molecules. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 40:819–823

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Afshar-Oromieh A, Haberkorn U, Schlemmer HP, Fenchel M, Eder M, Eisenhut M et al (2014) Comparison of PET/CT and PET/MRI hybrid systems using a (68)Ga-labelled PSMA ligand for the diagnosis of recurrent prostate cancer: initial experience. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 41:887–897

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Afshar-Oromieh A, Malcher A, Eder M, Eisenhut M, Linhart HG, Hadaschik BA et al (2013) PET imaging with a [68Ga]gallium-labelled PSMA ligand for the diagnosis of prostate cancer: biodistribution in humans and first evaluation of tumour lesions. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 40:486–495

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Afshar-OromiehA ZCM, MalcherA EM, Eisenhut M, Linhart HG et al (2014) Comparison of PET imaging with a (68)Ga -labelled PSMA ligand and (18)F-choline-based PET/CT for the diagnosis of recurrent prostate cancer. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 41:11–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Zechmann CM, Afshar-Oromieh A, Armor T, Stubbs JB, Mier W, Hadaschik B et al (2014) Radiation dosimetry and first therapy results with a (124)I/(131)I-labeled small molecule (MIP-1095) targeting PSMA for prostate cancer therapy. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 41:1280–1292

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Lapi SE, Wahnishe H, Pham D, Wu LY, Nedrow-Byers JR, Liu T et al (2009) Assessment of an 18F-labeled phosphoramidate peptidomimetic as a new prostate-specific membrane antigen targeted imaging agent for prostate cancer. J Nucl Med 50:2042–2048

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Holland JP, Divilov V, Bander NH, Smith-Jones PM, Larson SM, Lewis JS (2010) 89Zr-DFO-J591 for immunoPET of prostate-specific membrane antigen expression in vivo. J Nucl Med 51:1293–1300

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Demirci E, Sahin OE, Ocak M, Akovali B, Nematyazar J, Kabasakal L (2016) Normal distribution pattern and physiological variants of 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT imaging. Nucl Med Commun 37(11):1169–1179

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Wallitt KL, Khan SR, Dubash S, Tam HH, Khan S, Barwick TD (2017) Clinical PET Imaging in Prostate Cancer. Radiographics 37:1512–1536

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Krohn T, Verburg FA, Pufe T et al (2015) [68Ga] PSMA-HBED uptake mimicking lymph node metastasis in coeliac ganglia: an important pitfall in clinical practice. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 42(2):210–214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Beheshti M, Rezaee A, Langsteger W (2017) 68Ga-PSMA-HBED uptake on cervicothoracic (stellate) ganglia, a common pitfall on PET/CT. Clin Nucl Med 42(3):195–196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Afshar-Oromieh A, Avtzi E, Giesel FL, Holland-Letz T, Linhart HG, Eder M, Eisenhut M, Boxler S, Hadaschik BA, Kratochwil C, Weichert W, Kopka K, Debus J, Haberkorn U (2015) The diagnostic value of PET/CT imaging with the 68Ga-labelled PSMA ligand HBED-CC in the diagnosis of recurrent prostate cancer. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 42:197–209

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Galen RS (1980) Predictive values and efficiency of laboratory testing. Pediat J Clin North Am 27:861–869

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Roethke MC, Kuru TH, Afshar-Oromieh A, Schlemmer HP, Hadaschik BA, Fenchel M (2013) Hybrid positron emission tomography-magnetic resonance imaging with gallium 68 prostate-specific membrane antigen tracer: a next step for imaging of recurrent prostate cancer-preliminary results. Eur Urol 64:862–864

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Ross JS, Sheehan CE, Fisher HA, Kaufman RP Jr, Kaur P, Gray K et al (2003) Correlation of primary tumor prostate-specific membrane antigen expression with disease recurrence in prostate cancer. Clin Cancer Res 9:6357–6362

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Silver DA, Pellicer I, Fair WR, Heston WD, Cordon-Cardo C (1997) Prostate-specific membrane antigen expression in normal and malignant human tissues. Clin Cancer Res 3:81–85

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Eiber M, Maurer T, Souvatzoglou M, Beer AJ, Ruffani A, Haller B, Graner F-P, Kübler H, Haberhorn U, Eisenhut M, Hans-JürgenWester, Gschwend JE, Schwaiger M (2015) Evaluation of hybrid 68Ga-PSMA ligand PET/CT in 248 patients with biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy. J Nucl Med 56:668–674

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Mattiolli AB, Santos A, Vicente A, Queiroz M, Bastos D, Herchenhorn D, Srougi M, Peixoto FA, Morikawa L, da Silva JLF, Etchebehere E (2018) Impact of 68GA-PSMA PET /CT on treatment of patients with recurrent / metastatic high risk prostate cancer – a multicenter study. Int Braz J Urol 44:892–899

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Fitzpatrick L, Lynch O, Marignol L (2017) 68Ga-PSMA-PET/CT has a role in detecting prostate cancer lesions in patients with recurrent disease. Anticancer Res 37:2753–2760

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Aloÿse Fourquet, Cyrielle Aveline, Olivier Cussenot, Gilles Créhange, Françoise Montravers,Jean-Noël Talbot , Mathieu Gauthé (2020) 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT in restaging castration-resistant nonmetastatic prostate cancer: detection rate, impact on patients’ disease management and adequacy of impact 10:2104.

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

No funding was received for this work from any organization.

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Radiology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt

    Talaat Ahmed Abd El Hameed Hassan

  2. Radiology Department, National Cancer Institute, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt

    Mohammed Samy Elazab

Authors
  1. Talaat Ahmed Abd El Hameed Hassan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Mohammed Samy Elazab
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

All authors had actively contributed to the work. TAH contributed to the idea of study and data collection, obtained the radiological data in this study, shared in the design and coordination of the study, revised the obtained results, contributed to image revision, and did drafting the manuscript. MSE revised the obtained results and data and final editing. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Talaat Ahmed Abd El Hameed Hassan.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The protocol was reviewed and approved by the local ethics committee of the radiology department, Kasr Aliny hospital, Cairo University. The reference number was not applicable. All patients had given their written consents to participate in this work.

Consent for publication

All patients had given their written consent for publication of this work.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hassan, T.A.A.E.H., Elazab, M.S. The diagnostic value of PET/CT imaging with the 68Ga-labeled PSMA-ligand in the follow up assessment of prostate cancer after therapy. Egypt J Radiol Nucl Med 51, 136 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s43055-020-00259-2

Download citation

Keywords

  • Prostatic cancer
  • PSMA
  • PET/CT
  • 68-Ga